The Cognitive Foundations of Economic Exchange: A Modular Framework Grounded in Behavioral Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02945v4
• Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 16:08:09 GMT
• Title: The Cognitive Foundations of Economic Exchange: A Modular Framework Grounded in Behavioral Evidence
• Abstract summary: Evidence from early human societies suggests that reciprocity-not barter-was the foundational economic logic.<n>We introduce a minimal behavioral framework based on cognitive primitives--individual recognition, reciprocal credence, and cost-return sensitivity.<n>This framework offers a unified substrate for modeling trust, coordination, and economic behavior in both human and artificial systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The origins of economic behavior remain unresolved-not only in the social sciences but also in AI, where dominant theories often rely on predefined incentives or institutional assumptions. Contrary to the longstanding myth of barter as the foundation of exchange, converging evidence from early human societies suggests that reciprocity-not barter-was the foundational economic logic, enabling communities to sustain exchange and social cohesion long before formal markets emerged. Yet despite its centrality, reciprocity lacks a simulateable and cognitively grounded account. Here, we introduce a minimal behavioral framework based on three empirically supported cognitive primitives-individual recognition, reciprocal credence, and cost--return sensitivity-that enable agents to participate in and sustain reciprocal exchange, laying the foundation for scalable economic behavior. These mechanisms scaffold the emergence of cooperation, proto-economic exchange, and institutional structure from the bottom up. By bridging insights from primatology, developmental psychology, and economic anthropology, this framework offers a unified substrate for modeling trust, coordination, and economic behavior in both human and artificial systems. For an interactive visualization of the framework, see: https://egil158.github.io/cogfoundations-econ/

Related papers

• A game theory for foundation models shows new paths to rational cooperation through similarity inference [56.53805518668248]
  We show that foundation model agents engaging in optimal planning consistently converge to stable cooperation.<n>By shifting from decoupled to embedded agency, these agents model themselves as part of the universe they inhabit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:24:33Z)
• Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions [80.74432115171285]
  We study how a population of agents self-orchestrate and self-adapt into stronger collective intelligence without centralized control.<n>Inspired by Friedrich Hayek's economic theory of decentralized coordination in markets, we study this question through an agent economy in which agents compete via auctions for the right to act, exchange payments, and accumulate wealth from environmental rewards.<n>We show that, with weak agents, the economy produces emergent multi-step reasoning strategies and outperforms stronger monolithic baselines across five agentic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T20:21:09Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic Classification [56.458581740660236]
  We propose the Prospect-Guided Strategic Framework (Pro-SF) to address the behaviorally realistic strategic classification problem.<n>Pro-SF is a principled framework grounded in prospect theory to model and learn under behaviorally realistic strategic responses.<n> Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets establish Pro-SF as a behaviorally grounded approach to strategic classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T11:04:55Z)
• A Co-Evolutionary Theory of Human-AI Coexistence: Mutualism, Governance, and Dynamics in Complex Societies [0.0]
  This paper proposes conditional mutualism under governance as a framework for human-AI coexistence.<n>We synthesize concepts from computability, machine learning, foundation models, embodied AI, alignment, human-robot interaction, ecological mutualism, coevolution, and polycentric governance.<n>We then formalize coexistence as a multiplex dynamical system across physical, psychological, and social layers, with reciprocal supply-demand coupling, conflict penalties, developmental freedom, and governance regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T05:02:20Z)
• SAVOIR: Learning Social Savoir-Faire via Shapley-based Reward Attribution [82.31558282651811]
  Social intelligence, the ability to navigate complex interpersonal interactions, presents a fundamental challenge for language agents.<n>Existing approaches directly employ language models to distribute episode-level rewards, yielding attributions that are retrospective and lack theoretical grounding.<n>We propose SAVOIR, a novel principled framework grounded in cooperative game theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T02:08:25Z)
• World Models Should Prioritize the Unification of Physical and Social Dynamics [57.91940497010114]
  This paper argues that the systematic, bidirectional unification of physical and social predictive capabilities is the next crucial frontier for world model development.<n>We contend that comprehensive world models must holistically integrate objective physical laws with the subjective, evolving, and context-dependent nature of social dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T07:42:37Z)
• Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning [94.60442643943696]
  We introduce Cognitive Reasoning, a paradigm modeled on human social cognition.<n>CogFlow is a complete framework that instills this capability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:27:29Z)
• DynamiX: Large-Scale Dynamic Social Network Simulator [101.65679342680542]
  DynamiX is a novel large-scale social network simulator dedicated to dynamic social network modeling.<n>For opinion leaders, we propose an information-stream-based link prediction method recommending potential users with similar stances.<n>For ordinary users, we construct an inequality-oriented behavior decision-making module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T12:13:30Z)
• Agent-based modeling and the sociology of money: some suggestions for refining monetary theory using social simulation [0.0]
  The institution of money can be seen as a foundational social mechanism, enabling communities to quantify collectively regulate economic processes.<n>This paper reviews influential views on the nature of money in economics and sociology, contrasting them to the relatively limited findings of recent agent-based models of "the emergence of money"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T15:32:08Z)
• Reciprocity as the Foundational Substrate of Society: How Reciprocal Dynamics Scale into Social Systems [0.0]
  We argue that reciprocity is not merely a local or primitive exchange, but a scalable substrate from which large-scale social structures can emerge.<n>We propose a three-stage framework to model this emergence: reciprocal dynamics at the individual level, norm stabilization through shared expectations, and the construction of durable institutional patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T07:50:01Z)
• Towards Developing Ethical Reasoners: Integrating Probabilistic Reasoning and Decision-Making for Complex AI Systems [4.854297874710511]
  A computational ethics framework is essential for AI and autonomous systems operating in complex, real-world environments.<n>Existing approaches often lack the adaptability needed to integrate ethical principles into dynamic and ambiguous contexts.<n>We outline the necessary ingredients for building a holistic, meta-level framework that combines intermediate representations, probabilistic reasoning, and knowledge representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T17:25:11Z)
• Social Genome: Grounded Social Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Models [61.88413918026431]
  Social reasoning abilities are crucial for AI systems to interpret and respond to multimodal human communication and interaction within social contexts.<n>We introduce SOCIAL GENOME, the first benchmark for fine-grained, grounded social reasoning abilities of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T00:05:40Z)
• TwinMarket: A Scalable Behavioral and Social Simulation for Financial Markets [24.354300029071418]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have gained traction as simulation tools for modeling human behavior.<n>We introduce TwinMarket, a novel multi-agent framework that leverages LLMs to simulate socio-economic systems.<n>Our approach provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between individual decision-making and collective socio-economic patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:39:48Z)
• Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models [46.23852835759767]
  This paper presents a study on conformity in large language models (LLMs) driven collaborative AI systems.<n>We focus on three aspects: the existence of conformity, the factors influencing conformity, and potential mitigation strategies.<n>Our analysis delves into factors influencing conformity, including interaction time and majority size, and examines how the subject agent rationalizes its conforming behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T04:50:03Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [79.96817421756668]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate polarization and its consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• RealBehavior: A Framework for Faithfully Characterizing Foundation Models' Human-like Behavior Mechanisms [45.97077960079147]
  We introduce a framework, RealBehavior, which is designed to characterize the humanoid behaviors of models faithfully. Our findings suggest that a simple application of psychological tools cannot faithfully characterize all human-like behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T12:58:17Z)
• Towards CausalGPT: A Multi-Agent Approach for Faithful Knowledge Reasoning via Promoting Causal Consistency in LLMs [55.66353783572259]
  Causal-Consistency Chain-of-Thought harnesses multi-agent collaboration to bolster the faithfulness and causality of foundation models.<n>Our framework demonstrates significant superiority over state-of-the-art methods through extensive and comprehensive evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T04:59:21Z)
• On Computational Mechanisms for Shared Intentionality, and Speculation on Rationality and Consciousness [0.0]
  A singular attribute of humankind is our ability to undertake novel, cooperative behavior, or teamwork. This requires that we can communicate goals, plans, and ideas between the brains of individuals to create shared intentionality. I derive necessary characteristics of basic mechanisms to enable shared intentionality between prelinguistic computational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T21:31:38Z)
• Rethinking Model Evaluation as Narrowing the Socio-Technical Gap [47.632123167141245]
  We argue that model evaluation practices must take on a critical task to cope with the challenges and responsibilities brought by this homogenization.<n>We urge the community to develop evaluation methods based on real-world contexts and human requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T00:01:43Z)
• On Blockchain We Cooperate: An Evolutionary Game Perspective [0.8566457170664925]
  In this paper, we introduce rationality and game-theoretical solution concepts to study the equilibrium outcomes of consensus protocols. We apply bounded rationality to model agent behavior, and resolve the initial conditions for three different stable equilibria. Our research contributes to the literature across disciplines, including distributed consensus in computer science, game theory in economics on blockchain consensus, evolutionary game theory at the intersection of biology and economics, and cooperative AI with joint insights into computing and social science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-10T19:56:10Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
• A mechanism of Individualistic Indirect Reciprocity with internal and external dynamics [0.0]
  This research proposes a new variant of Nowak and Sigmund model, focused on agents' attitude. Using Agent-Based Model and a Data Science method, we show on simulation results that the discriminatory stance of the agents prevails in most cases. The results also show that when the reputation of others is unknown, with a high obstinacy and high cooperation demand, a heterogeneous society is obtained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T23:28:50Z)
• Deontological Ethics By Monotonicity Shape Constraints [6.117084972237769]
  We show how easy it is for modern machine-learned systems to violate common deontological ethical principles and social norms. We propose that in some cases such ethical principles can be incorporated into a machine-learned model by adding shape constraints that constrain the model to respond only positively to relevant inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T18:27:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.