A Co-Evolutionary Theory of Human-AI Coexistence: Mutualism, Governance, and Dynamics in Complex Societies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22227v3
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:51:58 GMT
• Title: A Co-Evolutionary Theory of Human-AI Coexistence: Mutualism, Governance, and Dynamics in Complex Societies
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes conditional mutualism under governance as a framework for human-AI coexistence.<n>We synthesize concepts from computability, machine learning, foundation models, embodied AI, alignment, human-robot interaction, ecological mutualism, coevolution, and polycentric governance.<n>We then formalize coexistence as a multiplex dynamical system across physical, psychological, and social layers, with reciprocal supply-demand coupling, conflict penalties, developmental freedom, and governance regularization.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Classical robot ethics is often framed around obedience, including Asimov's laws. This framing is insufficient for contemporary AI systems, which are increasingly adaptive, generative, embodied, and embedded in physical, psychological, and social environments. This paper proposes conditional mutualism under governance as a framework for human-AI coexistence: a co-evolutionary relationship in which humans and AI systems develop, specialize, and coordinate under institutional conditions that preserve reciprocity, reversibility, psychological safety, and social legitimacy. We synthesize concepts from computability, machine learning, foundation models, embodied AI, alignment, human-robot interaction, ecological mutualism, coevolution, and polycentric governance. We then formalize coexistence as a multiplex dynamical system across physical, psychological, and social layers, with reciprocal supply-demand coupling, conflict penalties, developmental freedom, and governance regularization. The model gives conditions for existence, uniqueness, and global asymptotic stability of equilibria. We complement the analytical results with deterministic ODE simulations, basin sweeps, sensitivity analyses, governance-regime comparisons, shock tests, and local stability checks. The simulations indicate that governed mutualism reaches a high coexistence index with negligible domination, whereas insufficient or excessive governance can produce domination, weak-benefit lock-in, or suppressed developmental freedom. The results suggest that human-AI coexistence should be designed as a co-evolutionary governance problem rather than as a static obedience problem.

Related papers

• A game theory for foundation models shows new paths to rational cooperation through similarity inference [56.53805518668248]
  We show that foundation model agents engaging in optimal planning consistently converge to stable cooperation.<n>By shifting from decoupled to embedded agency, these agents model themselves as part of the universe they inhabit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:24:33Z)
• Human-AI Coevolution Dynamics: A Formal Theory of Social Intelligence Emergence Through Long-Term Interaction [5.695102624267339]
  We propose a formal model of human-AI interaction as a self-organizing social cognitive system.<n>Results show that social intelligence emerges from long-term social cognitive coevolution rather than isolated conversational capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T14:47:59Z)
• Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI [49.05972944310475]
  We show that when contracts cannot distinguish all relevant future contingencies, there is a strictly positive welfare loss that no realistic mechanism can eliminate.<n>We show that prosocial agents, who weigh others' welfare alongside their own, can close this gap and achieve outcomes that are socially superior and individually beneficial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T19:37:07Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Social physics in the age of artificial intelligence [38.42884650966473]
  Artificial intelligence systems are rapidly becoming more capable, autonomous, and deeply embedded in social life.<n>As humans increasingly interact, cooperate, and compete with AI, we move from purely human societies to hybrid human-AI societies.<n>We argue that these developments open a new research agenda for social physics centred on the co-evolution of humans and machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T10:41:35Z)
• World Models Should Prioritize the Unification of Physical and Social Dynamics [57.91940497010114]
  This paper argues that the systematic, bidirectional unification of physical and social predictive capabilities is the next crucial frontier for world model development.<n>We contend that comprehensive world models must holistically integrate objective physical laws with the subjective, evolving, and context-dependent nature of social dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T07:42:37Z)
• AI Safety, Alignment, and Ethics (AI SAE) [0.0]
  Moral norms are adaptive mechanisms that render cooperation fitness-viable under selection pressure.<n>Current alignment approaches add ethics post hoc, treating it as an external constraint rather than embedding it as an evolutionary strategy for cooperation.<n>I propose a governance--embedding--representation pipeline linking moral representation learning to system-level design and institutional governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T20:52:36Z)
• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• Rational Superautotrophic Diplomacy (SupraAD); A Conceptual Framework for Alignment Based on Interdisciplinary Findings on the Fundamentals of Cognition [0.0]
  Rational Superautotrophic Diplomacy (SupraAD) is a theoretical, interdisciplinary conceptual framework for alignment.<n>It draws on cognitive systems analysis and instrumental rationality modeling.<n>SupraAD reframes alignment as a challenge that predates AI, afflicting all sufficiently complex, coadapting intelligences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:28:25Z)
• Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignment [16.283971225367537]
  Humans strive to design safe AI systems that align with our goals and remain under our control.<n>As AI capabilities advance, we face a new challenge: the emergence of deeper, more persistent relationships between humans and AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:50:08Z)
• Incentivized Symbiosis: A Paradigm for Human-Agent Coevolution [0.0]
  Evolutionary game theory offers a lens to understand the structures and incentives that enable cooperation to be a successful strategy.<n>The convergence of human-agent teaming, contract theory, and decentralized frameworks like Web3 offers a foundation for fostering cooperation.<n>We conceptualize Incentivized Symbiosis as a social contract between humans and AI, inspired by Web3 principles and encoded in blockchain technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T20:23:48Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Evolving AI Collectives to Enhance Human Diversity and Enable Self-Regulation [40.763340315488406]
  Large language model behavior is shaped by the language of those with whom they interact. This capacity and their increasing prevalence online portend that they will intentionally or unintentionally "program" one another. We discuss opportunities for AI cross-moderation and address ethical issues and design challenges associated with creating and maintaining free-formed AI collectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T22:59:43Z)
• World Models and Predictive Coding for Cognitive and Developmental Robotics: Frontiers and Challenges [51.92834011423463]
  We focus on the two concepts of world models and predictive coding. In neuroscience, predictive coding proposes that the brain continuously predicts its inputs and adapts to model its own dynamics and control behavior in its environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T06:38:14Z)
• On the Philosophical, Cognitive and Mathematical Foundations of Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) [87.3520234553785]
  Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) are advanced intelligent and cognitive systems exhibiting autonomous collective intelligence. This work presents a theoretical framework of SAS underpinned by the latest advances in intelligence, cognition, computer, and system sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T05:44:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.