Racing Against the Clock: Exploring the Impact of Scheduled Deadlines on Technical Debt

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04027v1
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 00:05:01 GMT
• Title: Racing Against the Clock: Exploring the Impact of Scheduled Deadlines on Technical Debt
• Authors: Joshua Aldrich Edbert, Zadia Codabux, Roberto Verdecchia,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the impact of scheduled deadlines on Technical Debt (TD)<n>It analyzes how scheduled deadlines affect code quality, commit activities, and issues in issue-tracking systems.
• Score: 3.391083554509444
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: Technical Debt (TD) describes suboptimal software development practices with long-term consequences, such as defects and vulnerabilities. Deadlines are a leading cause of the emergence of TD in software systems. While multiple aspects of TD have been studied, the empirical research findings on the impact of deadlines are still inconclusive. Aims: This study investigates the impact of scheduled deadlines on TD. It analyzes how scheduled deadlines affect code quality, commit activities, and issues in issue-tracking systems. Method: We analyzed eight Open Source Software (OSS) projects with regular release schedules using SonarQube. We analyzed 12.3k commits and 371 releases across these eight OSS projects. The study combined quantitative metrics with qualitative analyses to comprehensively understand TD accumulation under scheduled deadlines. Results: Our findings indicated that some projects had a clear increase in TD as deadlines approached (with above 50% of releases having increasing TD accumulation as deadlines approached), while others managed to maintain roughly the same amount of TD. Analysis of commit activities and issue tracking revealed that deadline proximity could lead to increased commit frequency and bug-related issue creation. Conclusions: Our study highlights that, in some cases, impending deadlines have a clear impact on TD. The findings pinpoint the need to mitigate last-minute coding rushes and the risks associated with deadline-driven TD accumulation.

Related papers

• When Is Enough Not Enough? Illusory Completion in Search Agents [56.98225130959051]
  We study whether search agents reliably reason across all requirements by tracking, verifying, and maintaining multiple conditions.<n>We find that illusory completion frequently occurs, wherein agents believe tasks are complete despite unresolved or violated constraints, leading to underverified answers.<n>We examine whether explicit constraint-state tracking during execution mitigates these failures via LiveLedger, an inference-time tracker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T13:50:38Z)
• On the Paradoxical Interference between Instruction-Following and Task Solving [50.75960598434753]
  Instruction following aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent by specifying explicit constraints on how tasks should be performed.<n>We reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon: instruction following can paradoxically interfere with LLMs' task-solving capability.<n>We propose a metric, SUSTAINSCORE, to quantify the interference of instruction following with task solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T17:48:56Z)
• UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarios [63.67884284105684]
  We introduce textbfUltraHorizon, a novel benchmark that measures the foundational capabilities essential for complex real-world challenges.<n>Agents are designed in long-horizon discovery tasks where they must iteratively uncover hidden rules.<n>Our experiments reveal that LLM-agents consistently underperform in these settings, whereas human participants achieve higher scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T02:04:00Z)
• Managing Technical Debt in a Multidisciplinary Data Intensive Software Team: an Observational Case Study [12.110862907227203]
  There is an increase in the investment and development of data-intensive (DI) solutions.<n>Without careful management, this growing investment will also grow associated technical debt (TD)<n>This research contributes empirical, practice based insights about multidisciplinary DI team TD management practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T00:53:45Z)
• Towards an Interpretable Analysis for Estimating the Resolution Time of Software Issues [1.4039240369201997]
  We build an issue monitoring system that extracts the actual effort required to fix issues on a per-project basis.<n>Our approach employs topic modeling to capture issue semantics and leverages metadata for interpretable resolution time analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T08:38:59Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• Sketch-of-Thought: Efficient LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Cognitive-Inspired Sketching [60.04718679054704]
  Chain-of-Thought prompting elicits step-by-step problem solving, but often at the cost of excessive verbosity in intermediate outputs.<n>We propose Sketch-of-Thought (SoT), a prompting framework that integrates cognitively inspired reasoning paradigms with linguistic constraints.<n>SoT achieves token reductions of up to 78% with minimal accuracy loss across 15 reasoning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T06:57:17Z)
• Detection of Technical Debt in Java Source Code [12.07607688189035]
  Technical debt (TD) describes the additional costs that emerge when developers opt for a quick and easy solution to a problem.<n>In this study, through the analysis of comments and their source code from 974 Java projects, we curated the first ever dataset of TD identified by code comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T10:12:33Z)
• Systematic literature review on forecasting and prediction of technical debt evolution [0.0]
  Technical debt (TD) refers to the additional costs incurred due to compromises in software quality. This study aims to explore existing knowledge in software engineering to gain insights into approaches proposed in research and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T18:50:37Z)
• Analyzing the concept of technical debt in the context of agile software development: A systematic literature review [3.246212137124741]
  Technical debt (TD) is a metaphor used to communicate the consequences of poor software development practices to non-technical stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to analyze and synthesize the state of the art of TD, and its causes, consequences, and management strategies in the context of agile software development (ASD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T14:07:18Z)
• Self-Admitted Technical Debt Detection Approaches: A Decade Systematic Review [5.670597842524448]
  Technical debt (TD) represents the long-term costs associated with suboptimal design or code decisions in software development. Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) occurs when developers explicitly acknowledge these trade-offs. automated detection of SATD has become an increasingly important research area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T12:01:13Z)
• Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators [121.15880285283116]
  This paper aims to evaluate the reasoning capacities of large language models (LLMs) in solving recent programming problems in Codeforces. We first provide a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's peiceived zero-shot performance on this task, considering various aspects such as problems' release time, difficulties, and types of errors encountered. Surprisingly, theThoughtived performance of GPT-4 has experienced a cliff like decline in problems after September 2021 consistently across all the difficulties and types of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:58:57Z)
• The Broken Windows Theory Applies to Technical Debt [2.864893907775704]
  The term technical debt (TD) describes the aggregation of sub-optimal solutions that impede the evolution and maintenance of a system. Some claim that the broken windows theory (BWT) also applies to software development projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T07:18:03Z)
• Improving Limited Labeled Dialogue State Tracking with Self-Supervision [91.68515201803986]
  Existing dialogue state tracking (DST) models require plenty of labeled data. We present and investigate two self-supervised objectives: preserving latent consistency and modeling conversational behavior. Our proposed self-supervised signals can improve joint goal accuracy by 8.95% when only 1% labeled data is used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T21:57:42Z)
• Clinical Risk Prediction with Temporal Probabilistic Asymmetric Multi-Task Learning [80.66108902283388]
  Multi-task learning methods should be used with caution for safety-critical applications, such as clinical risk prediction. Existing asymmetric multi-task learning methods tackle this negative transfer problem by performing knowledge transfer from tasks with low loss to tasks with high loss. We propose a novel temporal asymmetric multi-task learning model that performs knowledge transfer from certain tasks/timesteps to relevant uncertain tasks, based on feature-level uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T06:01:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.