Discriminative Ordering Through Ensemble Consensus

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04464v1
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 14:35:39 GMT
• Title: Discriminative Ordering Through Ensemble Consensus
• Authors: Louis Ohl, Fredrik Lindsten,
• Abstract summary: We take inspiration from consensus clustering and assume that a set of clustering models is able to uncover hidden structures in the data.<n>We propose a discriminative ordering through ensemble clustering based on the distance between the connectivity of a clustering model and the consensus matrix.
• Score: 12.714723443928298
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating the performance of clustering models is a challenging task where the outcome depends on the definition of what constitutes a cluster. Due to this design, current existing metrics rarely handle multiple clustering models with diverse cluster definitions, nor do they comply with the integration of constraints when available. In this work, we take inspiration from consensus clustering and assume that a set of clustering models is able to uncover hidden structures in the data. We propose to construct a discriminative ordering through ensemble clustering based on the distance between the connectivity of a clustering model and the consensus matrix. We first validate the proposed method with synthetic scenarios, highlighting that the proposed score ranks the models that best match the consensus first. We then show that this simple ranking score significantly outperforms other scoring methods when comparing sets of different clustering algorithms that are not restricted to a fixed number of clusters and is compatible with clustering constraints.

Related papers

• Towards Explainable Clustering: A Constrained Declarative based Approach [0.294944680995069]
  We aim at finding a clustering that has high quality in terms of classic clustering criteria and that is explainable. A good global explanation of a clustering should give the characteristics of each cluster taking into account their abilities to describe its objects. We propose a novel interpretable constrained method called ECS for declarative computation with Explainabilty-driven Selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T21:00:06Z)
• Reinforcement Graph Clustering with Unknown Cluster Number [91.4861135742095]
  We propose a new deep graph clustering method termed Reinforcement Graph Clustering. In our proposed method, cluster number determination and unsupervised representation learning are unified into a uniform framework. In order to conduct feedback actions, the clustering-oriented reward function is proposed to enhance the cohesion of the same clusters and separate the different clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T18:12:28Z)
• Revisiting Instance-Optimal Cluster Recovery in the Labeled Stochastic Block Model [69.15976031704687]
  We propose IAC (Instance-Adaptive Clustering), the first algorithm whose performance matches the instance-specific lower bounds both in expectation and with high probability.<n>IAC maintains an overall computational complexity of $ mathcalO(n, textpolylog(n) $, making it scalable and practical for large-scale problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T08:46:06Z)
• A parallelizable model-based approach for marginal and multivariate clustering [0.0]
  This paper develops a clustering method that takes advantage of the sturdiness of model-based clustering. We tackle this issue by specifying a finite mixture model per margin that allows each margin to have a different number of clusters. The proposed approach is computationally appealing as well as more tractable for moderate to high dimensions than a full' (joint) model-based clustering approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T23:54:41Z)
• clusterBMA: Bayesian model averaging for clustering [1.2021605201770345]
  We introduce clusterBMA, a method that enables weighted model averaging across results from unsupervised clustering algorithms. We use clustering internal validation criteria to develop an approximation of the posterior model probability, used for weighting the results from each model. In addition to outperforming other ensemble clustering methods on simulated data, clusterBMA offers unique features including probabilistic allocation to averaged clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T04:55:20Z)
• Personalized Federated Learning via Convex Clustering [72.15857783681658]
  We propose a family of algorithms for personalized federated learning with locally convex user costs. The proposed framework is based on a generalization of convex clustering in which the differences between different users' models are penalized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T19:25:31Z)
• Selecting the number of clusters, clustering models, and algorithms. A unifying approach based on the quadratic discriminant score [0.5330240017302619]
  We propose a selection rule that allows choosing among many clustering solutions. The proposed method has the distinctive advantage that it can compare partitions that cannot be compared with other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T15:38:58Z)
• Clustering to the Fewest Clusters Under Intra-Cluster Dissimilarity Constraints [0.0]
  equiwide clustering relies neither on density nor on a predefined number of expected classes, but on a dissimilarity threshold. We review and evaluate suitable clustering algorithms to identify trade-offs between the various practical solutions for this clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T12:02:18Z)
• You Never Cluster Alone [150.94921340034688]
  We extend the mainstream contrastive learning paradigm to a cluster-level scheme, where all the data subjected to the same cluster contribute to a unified representation. We define a set of categorical variables as clustering assignment confidence, which links the instance-level learning track with the cluster-level one. By reparametrizing the assignment variables, TCC is trained end-to-end, requiring no alternating steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T14:59:59Z)
• Graph Contrastive Clustering [131.67881457114316]
  We propose a novel graph contrastive learning framework, which is then applied to the clustering task and we come up with the Graph Constrastive Clustering(GCC) method. Specifically, on the one hand, the graph Laplacian based contrastive loss is proposed to learn more discriminative and clustering-friendly features. On the other hand, a novel graph-based contrastive learning strategy is proposed to learn more compact clustering assignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T15:32:49Z)
• Clustering Ensemble Meets Low-rank Tensor Approximation [50.21581880045667]
  This paper explores the problem of clustering ensemble, which aims to combine multiple base clusterings to produce better performance than that of the individual one. We propose a novel low-rank tensor approximation-based method to solve the problem from a global perspective. Experimental results over 7 benchmark data sets show that the proposed model achieves a breakthrough in clustering performance, compared with 12 state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T13:01:37Z)
• Scalable Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering [65.66407726145619]
  Existing scalable hierarchical clustering methods sacrifice quality for speed. We present a scalable, agglomerative method for hierarchical clustering that does not sacrifice quality and scales to billions of data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.