Prompt-Based LLMs for Position Bias-Aware Reranking in Personalized Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04948v2
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 02:44:15 GMT
• Title: Prompt-Based LLMs for Position Bias-Aware Reranking in Personalized Recommendations
• Authors: Md Aminul Islam, Ahmed Sayeed Faruk,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been adopted for prompt-based recommendation.<n>LLMs face limitations such as limited context window size, inefficient pointwise and pairwise prompting, and difficulty handling listwise ranking.<n>We propose a hybrid framework that combines a traditional recommendation model with an LLM for reranking top-k items using structured prompts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems are essential for delivering personalized content across digital platforms by modeling user preferences and behaviors. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been adopted for prompt-based recommendation due to their ability to generate personalized outputs without task-specific training. However, LLM-based methods face limitations such as limited context window size, inefficient pointwise and pairwise prompting, and difficulty handling listwise ranking due to token constraints. LLMs can also be sensitive to position bias, as they may overemphasize earlier items in the prompt regardless of their true relevance. To address and investigate these issues, we propose a hybrid framework that combines a traditional recommendation model with an LLM for reranking top-k items using structured prompts. We evaluate the effects of user history reordering and instructional prompts for mitigating position bias. Experiments on MovieLens-100K show that randomizing user history improves ranking quality, but LLM-based reranking does not outperform the base model. Explicit instructions to reduce position bias are also ineffective. Our evaluations reveal limitations in LLMs' ability to model ranking context and mitigate bias. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/aminul7506/LLMForReRanking.

Related papers

• Evaluating Position Bias in Large Language Model Recommendations [3.430780143519032]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly explored as general-purpose tools for recommendation tasks.<n>We show that LLM-based recommendation models suffer from position bias, where the order of candidate items in a prompt can disproportionately influence the recommendations produced by LLMs.<n>We introduce a new prompting strategy to mitigate the position bias of LLM recommendation models called Ranking via Iterative SElection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:30:26Z)
• PITA: Preference-Guided Inference-Time Alignment for LLM Post-Training [9.093854840532062]
  PITA is a novel framework that integrates preference feedback directly into the LLM's token generation.<n> PITA learns a small preference-based guidance policy to modify token probabilities at inference time without fine-tuning.<n>We evaluate PITA across diverse tasks, including mathematical reasoning and sentiment classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T21:46:32Z)
• Revisiting Prompt Engineering: A Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM-based Personalized Recommendation [2.3650193864974978]
  Large language models (LLMs) can perform recommendation tasks by taking prompts written in natural language as input.<n>This paper focuses on a single-user setting, where no information from other users is used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T20:26:00Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Recommender Systems: A Benchmark for Personalized Recommendation Assistant with LLMs [38.83854553636802]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the foundational architecture of RecSys.<n>Most existing studies rely on fixed task-specific prompt templates to generate recommendations.<n>This is because commonly used datasets lack high-quality textual user queries that reflect real-world recommendation scenarios.<n>We introduce RecBench+, a new dataset benchmark designed to access LLMs' ability to handle intricate user recommendation needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T13:28:23Z)
• LLM Self-Correction with DeCRIM: Decompose, Critique, and Refine for Enhanced Following of Instructions with Multiple Constraints [86.59857711385833]
  We introduce RealInstruct, the first benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to follow real-world multi-constrained instructions. To address the performance gap between open-source and proprietary models, we propose the Decompose, Critique and Refine (DeCRIM) self-correction pipeline. Our results show that DeCRIM improves Mistral's performance by 7.3% on RealInstruct and 8.0% on IFEval even with weak feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T01:25:10Z)
• From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint Tuning [91.79567270986901]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to prioritize adherence to user prompts over providing veracious responses.<n>Recent works propose to employ supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to mitigate the sycophancy issue.<n>We propose a novel supervised pinpoint tuning (SPT), where the region-of-interest modules are tuned for a given objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T07:01:37Z)
• Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback [58.834937450242975]
  Demonstration ITerated Task Optimization (DITTO) directly aligns language model outputs to a user's demonstrated behaviors.<n>We evaluate DITTO's ability to learn fine-grained style and task alignment across domains such as news articles, emails, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T23:13:56Z)
• LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank [62.02782819559389]
  Policy can learn more effectively from a ranked list of plausible responses given the prompt.<n>We show that LiPO-$lambda$ can outperform DPO variants and SLiC by a clear margin on several preference alignment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T20:08:10Z)
• Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models [74.04950416204551]
  We propose finetuning an instruction-tuned large language model using our novel textitprobabilistic ranking and textitcontextual ranking approaches. Probabilistic ranking enables the instruction-tuned model to inherit the relative rankings of high-quality and low-quality responses from the teacher LLM. On the other hand, learning with contextual ranking allows the model to refine its own response distribution using the contextual understanding ability of stronger LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T09:55:06Z)
• Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Rankers for Recommender Systems [76.02500186203929]
  This work aims to investigate the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to act as the ranking model for recommender systems. We show that LLMs have promising zero-shot ranking abilities but struggle to perceive the order of historical interactions. We demonstrate that these issues can be alleviated using specially designed prompting and bootstrapping strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:57:39Z)
• PALR: Personalization Aware LLMs for Recommendation [7.407353565043918]
  PALR aims to combine user history behaviors (such as clicks, purchases, ratings, etc.) with large language models (LLMs) to generate user preferred items. Our solution outperforms state-of-the-art models on various sequential recommendation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T17:21:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.