Exploring the Susceptibility to Fraud of Monetary Incentive Mechanisms for Strengthening FOSS Projects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05897v1
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 09:05:38 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Susceptibility to Fraud of Monetary Incentive Mechanisms for Strengthening FOSS Projects
• Authors: Ben Swierzy, Timo Pohl, Marc Ohm, Michael Meier,
• Abstract summary: We find non-commercial incentives to fill an important gap, ensuring longevity and sustainability of projects.<n>We find the Sovereign Tech Fund to be able to achieve a high resilience against fraud attempts, while tea is highly susceptible to fraud.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Free and open source software (FOSS) is ubiquitous on modern IT systems, accelerating the speed of software engineering over the past decades. With its increasing importance and historical reliance on uncompensated contributions, questions have been raised regarding the continuous maintenance of FOSS and its implications from a security perspective. In recent years, different funding programs have emerged to provide external incentives to reinforce community FOSS' sustainability. Past research primarily focused on analyses what type of projects have been funded and for what reasons. However, it has neither been considered whether there is a need for such external incentives, nor whether the incentive mechanisms, especially with the development of decentralized approaches, are susceptible to fraud. In this study, we explore the need for funding through a literature review and compare the susceptibility to fraud of centralized and decentralized incentive programs by performing case studies on the Sovereign Tech Fund (STF) and the tea project. We find non-commercial incentives to fill an important gap, ensuring longevity and sustainability of projects. Furthermore, we find the STF to be able to achieve a high resilience against fraud attempts, while tea is highly susceptible to fraud, as evidenced by revelation of an associated sybil attack on npm. Our results imply that special considerations must be taken into account when utilizing quantitative repository metrics regardless whether spoofing is expected.

Related papers

• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• Incubation and Beyond: A Comparative Analysis of ASF Projects Sustainability Impacts on Software Quality [2.7059033823627923]
  Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) communities' sustainability, meaning to remain operational without signs of weakening or interruptions to its development, is fundamental for the resilience and continuity of society's digital infrastructure.<n>This study seeks to understand how the different aspects of FOSS sustainability impact software quality from a life-cycle perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T07:51:40Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• Deep Learning Approaches for Anti-Money Laundering on Mobile Transactions: Review, Framework, and Directions [51.43521977132062]
  Money laundering is a financial crime that obscures the origin of illicit funds.<n>The proliferation of mobile payment platforms and smart IoT devices has significantly complicated anti-money laundering investigations.<n>This paper conducts a comprehensive review of deep learning solutions and the challenges associated with their use in AML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T05:19:44Z)
• To Think or Not to Think: Exploring the Unthinking Vulnerability in Large Reasoning Models [56.19026073319406]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are designed to solve complex tasks by generating explicit reasoning traces before producing final answers.<n>We reveal a critical vulnerability in LRMs -- termed Unthinking -- wherein the thinking process can be bypassed by manipulating special tokens.<n>In this paper, we investigate this vulnerability from both malicious and beneficial perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T10:45:56Z)
• An Overview of Cyber Security Funding for Open Source Software [3.5880059456896842]
  The paper examines two such funding bodies for OSS and the projects they have funded.<n>The focus of both funding bodies is on software security and cyber security in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T10:48:30Z)
• A Toolkit for Measuring the Impacts of Public Funding on Open Source Software Development [0.0]
  Impacts of public funding on open source software development remain poorly understood. We present a taxonomy of potential social, economic, and technological impacts that can be both positive and negative. With this toolkit, we contribute to the multi-stakeholder conversation about the value and impacts of funding on OSS developers and society at large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T01:13:45Z)
• Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey [59.26328612791924]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a unified framework that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T09:06:44Z)
• Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security [15.219480512237682]
  Most concurrent blockchain systems rely heavily on the Proof-of-Work (PoW) or Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanisms for decentralized consensus and security assurance.<n>PoUW seeks to employ challenges of practical significance as PoW, thereby imbuing energy consumption with tangible value.<n>We introduce the concept of incentive-security that incentivizes rational provers to behave honestly for their best interest, bypassing the existing hardness to design a PoL mechanism with computational efficiency, a provable incentive-security guarantee and controllable difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T13:18:40Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Exploring Federated Unlearning: Analysis, Comparison, and Insights [101.64910079905566]
  federated unlearning enables the selective removal of data from models trained in federated systems.<n>This paper examines existing federated unlearning approaches, examining their algorithmic efficiency, impact on model accuracy, and effectiveness in preserving privacy.<n>We propose the OpenFederatedUnlearning framework, a unified benchmark for evaluating federated unlearning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T01:34:33Z)
• Individual context-free online community health indicators fail to identify open source software sustainability [3.192308005611312]
  We monitored thirty-eight open source projects over the period of a year. None of the projects were abandoned during this period, and only one project entered a planned shutdown. Results were highly heterogeneous, showing little commonality across documentation, mean response times for issues and code contributions, and available funding/staffing resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T14:41:41Z)
• Cross-ethnicity Face Anti-spoofing Recognition Challenge: A Review [79.49390241265337]
  Chalearn Face Anti-spoofing Attack Detection Challenge consists of single-modal (e.g., RGB) and multi-modal (e.g., RGB, Depth, Infrared (IR)) tracks. This paper presents an overview of the challenge, including its design, evaluation protocol and a summary of results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-23T06:43:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.