Exploring Federated Unlearning: Analysis, Comparison, and Insights
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19218v4
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 16:31:31 GMT
- Title: Exploring Federated Unlearning: Analysis, Comparison, and Insights
- Authors: Yang Zhao, Jiaxi Yang, Yiling Tao, Lixu Wang, Xiaoxiao Li, Dusit Niyato, H. Vincent Poor,
- Abstract summary: federated unlearning enables the selective removal of data from models trained in federated systems.<n>This paper examines existing federated unlearning approaches, examining their algorithmic efficiency, impact on model accuracy, and effectiveness in preserving privacy.<n>We propose the OpenFederatedUnlearning framework, a unified benchmark for evaluating federated unlearning methods.
- Score: 101.64910079905566
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The increasing demand for privacy-preserving machine learning has spurred interest in federated unlearning, which enables the selective removal of data from models trained in federated systems. However, developing federated unlearning methods presents challenges, particularly in balancing three often conflicting objectives: privacy, accuracy, and efficiency. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of existing federated unlearning approaches, examining their algorithmic efficiency, impact on model accuracy, and effectiveness in preserving privacy. We discuss key trade-offs among these dimensions and highlight their implications for practical applications across various domains. Additionally, we propose the OpenFederatedUnlearning framework, a unified benchmark for evaluating federated unlearning methods, incorporating classic baselines and diverse performance metrics. Our findings aim to guide practitioners in navigating the complex interplay of these objectives, offering insights to achieve effective and efficient federated unlearning. Finally, we outline directions for future research to further advance the state of federated unlearning techniques.
Related papers
- Benchmarking Federated Machine Unlearning methods for Tabular Data [9.30408906787193]
Machine unlearning enables a model to forget specific data upon request.
This paper presents a pioneering study on benchmarking machine unlearning methods within a federated setting.
We explore unlearning at the feature and instance levels, employing both machine learning, random forest and logistic regression models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T15:53:36Z) - Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models [55.343738234307544]
Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) represent a distributed learning paradigm that fuses general competences of foundation models as well as privacy-preserving capabilities of federated learning.
This paper provides a comprehensive summary of the ten challenging problems inherent in FedFMs, encompassing foundational theory, utilization of private data, continual learning, unlearning, Non-IID and graph data, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive mechanism design, game mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T04:01:15Z) - FEDLAD: Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses [50.921333548391345]
Federated Learning is a privacy preserving decentralized machine learning paradigm.
Recent research has revealed that private ground truth data can be recovered through a gradient technique known as Deep Leakage.
This paper introduces the FEDLAD Framework (Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Deep Leakage attacks and defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T11:42:26Z) - Advances in APPFL: A Comprehensive and Extensible Federated Learning Framework [1.4206132527980742]
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm enabling collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.
We present the recent advances in developing APPFL, a framework and benchmarking suite for federated learning.
We demonstrate the capabilities of APPFL through extensive experiments evaluating various aspects of FL, including communication efficiency, privacy preservation, computational performance, and resource utilization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T22:20:26Z) - Federated Learning driven Large Language Models for Swarm Intelligence: A Survey [2.769238399659845]
Federated learning (FL) offers a compelling framework for training large language models (LLMs)
We focus on machine unlearning, a crucial aspect for complying with privacy regulations like the Right to be Forgotten.
We explore various strategies that enable effective unlearning, such as perturbation techniques, model decomposition, and incremental learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-14T08:40:58Z) - Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models.
It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z) - Vertical Federated Learning for Effectiveness, Security, Applicability: A Survey [67.48187503803847]
Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) is a privacy-preserving distributed learning paradigm.
Recent research has shown promising results addressing various challenges in VFL.
This survey offers a systematic overview of recent developments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T16:05:06Z) - Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Models [34.37509703688661]
The integration of Foundation Models (FMs) with Federated Learning (FL) presents a transformative paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the emerging field of Federated Foundation Models (FedFM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T09:44:58Z) - Federated Learning with New Knowledge: Fundamentals, Advances, and
Futures [69.8830772538421]
This paper systematically defines the main sources of new knowledge in Federated Learning (FL)
We examine the impact of the form and timing of new knowledge arrival on the incorporation process.
We discuss the potential future directions for FL with new knowledge, considering a variety of factors such as scenario setups, efficiency, and security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-03T21:29:31Z) - Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics [2.7456900944642686]
Federated unlearning (FU) algorithms efficiently remove clients' contributions without full model retraining.
This article provides background concepts, empirical evidence, and practical guidelines to design/implement efficient FU schemes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-10T13:26:19Z) - Exploring Machine Learning Models for Federated Learning: A Review of
Approaches, Performance, and Limitations [1.1060425537315088]
Federated learning is a distributed learning framework enhanced to preserve the privacy of individuals' data.
In times of crisis, when real-time decision-making is critical, federated learning allows multiple entities to work collectively without sharing sensitive data.
This paper is a systematic review of the literature on privacy-preserving machine learning in the last few years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-17T19:23:21Z) - A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions [21.90319100485268]
In recent years, the notion of the right to be forgotten" (RTBF) has become a crucial aspect of data privacy for digital trust and AI safety.
Machine unlearning (MU) has gained considerable attention which allows an ML model to selectively eliminate identifiable information.
FU has emerged to confront the challenge of data erasure within federated learning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T13:32:00Z) - When Decentralized Optimization Meets Federated Learning [41.58479981773202]
Federated learning is a new learning paradigm for extracting knowledge from distributed data.
Most existing federated learning approaches concentrate on the centralized setting, which is vulnerable to a single-point failure.
An alternative strategy for addressing this issue is the decentralized communication topology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T03:51:14Z) - Combating Exacerbated Heterogeneity for Robust Models in Federated
Learning [91.88122934924435]
Combination of adversarial training and federated learning can lead to the undesired robustness deterioration.
We propose a novel framework called Slack Federated Adversarial Training (SFAT)
We verify the rationality and effectiveness of SFAT on various benchmarked and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-01T06:16:15Z) - A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on
Security, Robustness, and Privacy [47.89042524852868]
Federated Learning (FL) stands out as a promising solution for diverse real-world scenarios.
However, challenges around data isolation and privacy threaten the trustworthiness of FL systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-21T12:52:12Z) - Towards Federated Long-Tailed Learning [76.50892783088702]
Data privacy and class imbalance are the norm rather than the exception in many machine learning tasks.
Recent attempts have been launched to, on one side, address the problem of learning from pervasive private data, and on the other side, learn from long-tailed data.
This paper focuses on learning with long-tailed (LT) data distributions under the context of the popular privacy-preserved federated learning (FL) framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T02:34:22Z) - A Field Guide to Federated Optimization [161.3779046812383]
Federated learning and analytics are a distributed approach for collaboratively learning models (or statistics) from decentralized data.
This paper provides recommendations and guidelines on formulating, designing, evaluating and analyzing federated optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T18:09:08Z) - Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses [74.62641494122988]
We conduct the first comprehensive survey on this topic.
Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) poisoning attacks and defenses against robustness; 3) inference attacks and defenses against privacy, we provide an accessible review of this important topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T12:11:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.