Offensive Security for AI Systems: Concepts, Practices, and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06380v1
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 18:58:56 GMT
• Title: Offensive Security for AI Systems: Concepts, Practices, and Applications
• Authors: Josh Harguess, Chris M. Ward,
• Abstract summary: Traditional defensive measures often fall short against the unique and evolving threats facing AI-driven technologies.<n>This paper emphasizes proactive threat simulation and adversarial testing to uncover vulnerabilities throughout the AI lifecycle.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly adopted across sectors, the need for robust, proactive security strategies is paramount. Traditional defensive measures often fall short against the unique and evolving threats facing AI-driven technologies, making offensive security an essential approach for identifying and mitigating risks. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for offensive security in AI systems, emphasizing proactive threat simulation and adversarial testing to uncover vulnerabilities throughout the AI lifecycle. We examine key offensive security techniques, including weakness and vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, and red teaming, tailored specifically to address AI's unique susceptibilities. By simulating real-world attack scenarios, these methodologies reveal critical insights, informing stronger defensive strategies and advancing resilience against emerging threats. This framework advances offensive AI security from theoretical concepts to practical, actionable methodologies that organizations can implement to strengthen their AI systems against emerging threats.

Related papers

• Securing AI Systems: A Guide to Known Attacks and Impacts [0.0]
  This paper provides an overview of adversarial attacks unique to predictive and generative AI systems.<n>We identify eleven major attack types and explicitly link attack techniques to their impacts.<n>We aim to equip researchers, developers, security practitioners, and policymakers, with foundational knowledge to recognize AI-specific risks and implement effective defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:32:03Z)
• Transforming Cyber Defense: Harnessing Agentic and Frontier AI for Proactive, Ethical Threat Intelligence [0.0]
  This manuscript explores how the convergence of agentic AI and Frontier AI is transforming cybersecurity.<n>We examine the roles of real time monitoring, automated incident response, and perpetual learning in forging a resilient, dynamic defense ecosystem.<n>Our vision is to harmonize technological innovation with unwavering ethical oversight, ensuring that future AI driven security solutions uphold core human values of fairness, transparency, and accountability while effectively countering emerging cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T20:23:35Z)
• AISafetyLab: A Comprehensive Framework for AI Safety Evaluation and Improvement [73.0700818105842]
  We introduce AISafetyLab, a unified framework and toolkit that integrates representative attack, defense, and evaluation methodologies for AI safety.<n> AISafetyLab features an intuitive interface that enables developers to seamlessly apply various techniques.<n>We conduct empirical studies on Vicuna, analyzing different attack and defense strategies to provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T02:11:52Z)
• Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks [22.154001025679896]
  Embodied AI systems, including robots and autonomous vehicles, are increasingly integrated into real-world applications.<n>These vulnerabilities manifest through sensor spoofing, adversarial attacks, and failures in task and motion planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:38:07Z)
• Cyber Shadows: Neutralizing Security Threats with AI and Targeted Policy Measures [0.0]
  Cyber threats pose risks at individual, organizational, and societal levels.<n>This paper proposes a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy that integrates AI-driven solutions with targeted policy interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-03T09:26:50Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Asset-centric Threat Modeling for AI-based Systems [7.696807063718328]
  This paper presents ThreatFinderAI, an approach and tool to model AI-related assets, threats, countermeasures, and quantify residual risks. To evaluate the practicality of the approach, participants were tasked to recreate a threat model developed by cybersecurity experts of an AI-based healthcare platform. Overall, the solution's usability was well-perceived and effectively supports threat identification and risk discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T08:40:01Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
  This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques. It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.