Centralized Trust in Decentralized Systems: Unveiling Hidden Contradictions in Blockchain and Cryptocurrency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06661v1
• Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 14:38:37 GMT
• Title: Centralized Trust in Decentralized Systems: Unveiling Hidden Contradictions in Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
• Authors: Faisal Haque Bappy, EunJeong Cheon, Tariqul Islam,
• Abstract summary: We examine how trust manifests in cryptocurrency ecosystems despite their decentralized architecture.<n>Users actively seek out and create centralized trust anchors, such as established exchanges, prominent community figures, and recognized development teams.<n>We identify how this contradiction arises from users' mental need for accountability and their reluctance to shoulder the full responsibility of self-custody.
• Score: 0.935356974451955
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Blockchain technology promises to democratize finance and promote social equity through decentralization, but questions remain about whether current implementations advance or hinder these goals. Through a mixed-methods study combining semi-structured interviews with 13 diverse blockchain stakeholders and analysis of over 3,000 cryptocurrency discussions on Reddit, we examine how trust manifests in cryptocurrency ecosystems despite their decentralized architecture. Our findings uncover that users actively seek out and create centralized trust anchors, such as established exchanges, prominent community figures, and recognized development teams, contradicting blockchain's fundamental promise of trustless interactions. We identify how this contradiction arises from users' mental need for accountability and their reluctance to shoulder the full responsibility of self-custody. The study also reveals how these centralized trust patterns disproportionately impact different user groups, with newer and less technical users showing stronger preferences for centralized intermediaries. This work contributes to our understanding of the inherent tensions between theoretical decentralization and practical implementation in cryptocurrency systems, highlighting the persistent role of centralized trust in supposedly trustless environments.

Related papers

• Are Crypto Ecosystems (De)centralizing? A Framework for Longitudinal Analysis [0.0]
  We propose a framework for measuring the decentralization of crypto ecosystems over time and compare commonly used decentralization metrics.<n>Our analysis revealed that while crypto has largely become more decentralized over time, recent trends show a shift toward centralization in the consensus layer, NFT marketplaces, and developers.<n>Our framework and results inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the design, regulation, and implementation of crypto ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T23:45:33Z)
• Enhancing Blockchain Cross Chain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey [39.613235136790244]
  We systematically analyze over 150 high impact sources from academic journals, digital libraries, and grey literature.<n>We offer a classification of interoperability approaches including Atomic Swaps, Sidechains, Light Clients, and so on, which represent the most comprehensive overview to date.<n>Our findings aim to support researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders in harnessing the transformative potential of blockchain interoperability to address current challenges and drive forward a cohesive multi-chain ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T04:24:50Z)
• Trusted Compute Units: A Framework for Chained Verifiable Computations [41.94295877935867]
  This paper introduces the Trusted Compute Unit (TCU), a unifying framework that enables composable and interoperable computations across heterogeneous technologies.<n>By enabling secure off-chain interactions without incurring on-chain confirmation delays or gas fees, TCUs significantly improve system performance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T09:01:55Z)
• MEV Ecosystem Evolution From Ethereum 1.0 [6.151915040556504]
  In traditional finance, there are possibilities to create values, e.g., arbitrage offers to create value from market inefficiencies or front-running offers to extract value for the participants having privileged roles. Such opportunities are readily available in DeFi ecosystems, where diverse participants engage in financial activities. In this survey, first, we show how lucrative such opportunities can be. Then, we discuss how protocolfollowing participants trying to capture such opportunities threaten to sabotage blockchain's performance. Finally, we review the current state of research trying to restore trustlessness and decentralization to provide all DeFi participants with a fair marketplace
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T14:22:26Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Blockchains for Internet of Things: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [38.29453164670072]
  Not every blockchain system is suitable for specific IoT applications. Public blockchains are not suitable for storing sensitive data. We explore the blockchain's application in three pivotal IoT areas: edge AI, communications, and healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T04:25:57Z)
• Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges [1.9624273277521183]
  The collapse of FTX, a major CEX, provides a unique natural experiment to examine the measurable impacts of trust and its sudden erosion on the cryptocurrency ecosystem.<n>This research investigates the impacts of the FTX collapse on user trust, focusing on token valuation, trading flows, and sentiment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T07:58:05Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Decoding Social Sentiment in DAO: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Governance Communities [1.9624273277521183]
  This paper delves deep into the evolving discourse and sentiment dynamics on the public forums of leading DeFi projects. We show participants in decentralized communities generally express positive sentiments during Discord discussions. There is a potential interaction between discussion intensity and sentiment dynamics; higher discussion volume may contribute to a more stable sentiment from code analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:23:47Z)
• Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless - justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
  Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks. We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities. We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)
• Blockchain in the management of science: conceptual models, promises and challenges [0.0]
  Proponents of blockchain for science present this technology as a tool to make science free from bias, red tape, data fraud, as well as provide innovative means to secure financial backing for new ideas. One issue concerns introducing crypto economy, with its financial incentives, into science, a field that emphasizes disinterested and non-pecuniary pursuit of truth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T19:49:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.