Are Crypto Ecosystems (De)centralizing? A Framework for Longitudinal Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02324v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:45:33 GMT
• Title: Are Crypto Ecosystems (De)centralizing? A Framework for Longitudinal Analysis
• Authors: Harang Ju, Ehsan Valavi, Madhav Kumar, Sinan Aral,
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for measuring the decentralization of crypto ecosystems over time and compare commonly used decentralization metrics.<n>Our analysis revealed that while crypto has largely become more decentralized over time, recent trends show a shift toward centralization in the consensus layer, NFT marketplaces, and developers.<n>Our framework and results inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the design, regulation, and implementation of crypto ecosystems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Blockchain technology relies on decentralization to resist faults and attacks while operating without trusted intermediaries. Although industry experts have touted decentralization as central to their promise and disruptive potential, it is still unclear whether the crypto ecosystems built around blockchains are becoming more or less decentralized over time. As crypto plays an increasing role in facilitating economic transactions and peer-to-peer interactions, measuring their decentralization becomes even more essential. We thus propose a systematic framework for measuring the decentralization of crypto ecosystems over time and compare commonly used decentralization metrics. We applied this framework to seven prominent crypto ecosystems, across five distinct subsystems and across their lifetime for over 15 years. Our analysis revealed that while crypto has largely become more decentralized over time, recent trends show a shift toward centralization in the consensus layer, NFT marketplaces, and developers. Our framework and results inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the design, regulation, and implementation of crypto ecosystems and provide a systematic, replicable foundation for future studies.

Related papers

• When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
  We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z)
• Centralized Trust in Decentralized Systems: Unveiling Hidden Contradictions in Blockchain and Cryptocurrency [0.935356974451955]
  We examine how trust manifests in cryptocurrency ecosystems despite their decentralized architecture.<n>Users actively seek out and create centralized trust anchors, such as established exchanges, prominent community figures, and recognized development teams.<n>We identify how this contradiction arises from users' mental need for accountability and their reluctance to shoulder the full responsibility of self-custody.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T14:38:37Z)
• Enhancing Blockchain Cross Chain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey [39.613235136790244]
  We systematically analyze over 150 high impact sources from academic journals, digital libraries, and grey literature.<n>We offer a classification of interoperability approaches including Atomic Swaps, Sidechains, Light Clients, and so on, which represent the most comprehensive overview to date.<n>Our findings aim to support researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders in harnessing the transformative potential of blockchain interoperability to address current challenges and drive forward a cohesive multi-chain ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T04:24:50Z)
• Decentralization: A Qualitative Survey of Node Operators [0.0]
  We solicit definitions of 'decentralization' and 'decentralization theatre' from blockchain node operators.<n>We find that most operators conceive decentralization as existing broadly on a technical and a governance axis.<n>Our key finding is that decentralization' alone does not affect ledger immutability or systemic robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T15:51:38Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Blockchains for Internet of Things: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [38.29453164670072]
  Not every blockchain system is suitable for specific IoT applications. Public blockchains are not suitable for storing sensitive data. We explore the blockchain's application in three pivotal IoT areas: edge AI, communications, and healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T04:25:57Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization [6.66161432273916]
  We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:13:09Z)
• SoK: Blockchain Governance [13.95507600720467]
  The topic of blockchain governance is a fertile domain for a thorough systematization. We start by distilling a comprehensive array of properties for sound governance systems. While all properties are satisfied, even partially, by at least one system, no system that most of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T18:38:26Z)
• Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1315215140430683]
  Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:58:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.