Reassessing Large Language Model Boolean Query Generation for Systematic Reviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07155v2
• Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 05:57:53 GMT
• Title: Reassessing Large Language Model Boolean Query Generation for Systematic Reviews
• Authors: Shuai Wang, Harrisen Scells, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been developed to assist in the development of complex queries.<n>This work systematically reproduces two studies that overlooked key aspects of the original work.<n>Our results show that query effectiveness varies significantly across models and prompt designs.<n>Our findings highlight the importance of model- and prompt-specific optimisations.
• Score: 33.74979207094165
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Systematic reviews are comprehensive literature reviews that address highly focused research questions and represent the highest form of evidence in medicine. A critical step in this process is the development of complex Boolean queries to retrieve relevant literature. Given the difficulty of manually constructing these queries, recent efforts have explored Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in their formulation. One of the first studies,Wang et al., investigated ChatGPT for this task, followed by Staudinger et al., which evaluated multiple LLMs in a reproducibility study. However, the latter overlooked several key aspects of the original work, including (i) validation of generated queries, (ii) output formatting constraints, and (iii) selection of examples for chain-of-thought (Guided) prompting. As a result, its findings diverged significantly from the original study. In this work, we systematically reproduce both studies while addressing these overlooked factors. Our results show that query effectiveness varies significantly across models and prompt designs, with guided query formulation benefiting from well-chosen seed studies. Overall, prompt design and model selection are key drivers of successful query formulation. Our findings provide a clearer understanding of LLMs' potential in Boolean query generation and highlight the importance of model- and prompt-specific optimisations. The complex nature of systematic reviews adds to challenges in both developing and reproducing methods but also highlights the importance of reproducibility studies in this domain.

Related papers

• Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z)
• Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Chemistry-Centric Case Study [0.9424565541639368]
  We introduce a new benchmark consisting of a curated dataset and a defined evaluation process to assess the compositional reasoning capabilities of large language models within the chemistry domain.<n>Our approach integrates OpenAI reasoning models with named entity recognition (NER) systems to extract chemical entities from recent literature, which are then augmented with external knowledge bases to form a knowledge graph.<n>Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art models face significant challenges in multi-hop compositional reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T04:36:19Z)
• Improving Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Language Models through Dialectic Reasoning Argumentations [65.11348389219887]
  We introduce Dialectic-RAG (DRAG), a modular approach that evaluates retrieved information by comparing, contrasting, and resolving conflicting perspectives.<n>We show the impact of our framework both as an in-context learning strategy and for constructing demonstrations to instruct smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T06:55:15Z)
• Think&Cite: Improving Attributed Text Generation with Self-Guided Tree Search and Progress Reward Modeling [63.98194996746229]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination and producing factually incorrect information.<n>We propose a novel framework, called Think&Cite, and formulate attributed text generation as a multi-step reasoning problem integrated with search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:55:48Z)
• A Reproducibility and Generalizability Study of Large Language Models for Query Generation [14.172158182496295]
  generative AI and large language models (LLMs) promise to revolutionize the systematic literature review process. This paper presents an extensive study of Boolean query generation using LLMs for systematic reviews. Our study investigates the replicability and reliability of results achieved using ChatGPT. We then generalize our results by analyzing and evaluating open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T13:15:03Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance.<n>We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
  Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems. The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness. This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z)
• Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Even High-school Textbook Knowledge Benefits Multimodal Reasoning [49.3242278912771]
  We introduce a novel multimodal RAG framework named RMR (Retrieval Meets Reasoning) The RMR framework employs a bi-modal retrieval module to identify the most relevant question-answer pairs. It significantly boosts the performance of various vision-language models across a spectrum of benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:23:49Z)
• Embedding-Informed Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [37.02290559379761]
  Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) have been remarkably competent in various NLP tasks.<n>Motivated by this, Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ARAG) studies retrieving only when the knowledge asked by the query is absent in the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:21:22Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspection [13.608076739368949]
  We introduce a novel framework that harnesses the potential of large-scale pre-trained language models. Our framework processes the output of a typical few-shot chain-of-thought prompt, assesses the correctness of the response, scrutinizes the answer, and ultimately produces a new solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T06:36:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.