Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08300v2
• Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:42:48 GMT
• Title: Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow
• Authors: Mumtahina Ahmed, Md Nahidul Islam Opu, Chanchal Roy, Sujana Islam Suhi, Shaiful Chowdhury,
• Abstract summary: We have analyzed 25,302 questions related to Mocking on FLOW techniques.<n>We have used Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling.<n>We have analyzed the annual and relative probabilities of each category to understand the evolution of mocking-related discussions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mocking is a common unit testing technique that is used to simplify tests, reduce flakiness, and improve coverage by replacing real dependencies with simplified implementations. Despite its widespread use in Open Source Software projects, there is limited understanding of how and why developers use mocks and the challenges they face. In this collaborative study, we have analyzed 25,302 questions related to Mocking on STACKOVERFLOW to identify the challenges faced by developers. We have used Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling, identified 30 key topics, and grouped the topics into five key categories. Consequently, we analyzed the annual and relative probabilities of each category to understand the evolution of mocking-related discussions. Trend analysis reveals that category like Advanced Programming peaked between 2009 and 2012 but have since declined, while categories such as Mocking Techniques and External Services have remained consistently dominant, highlighting evolving developer priorities and ongoing technical challenges. Our findings also show an inverse relationship between a topic's popularity and its difficulty. Popular topics like Framework Selection tend to have lower difficulty and faster resolution times, while complex topics like HTTP Requests and Responses are more likely to remain unanswered and take longer to resolve. A classification of questions into How, Why, What, and Other revealed that over 70% are How questions, particularly in practical domains like file access and APIs, indicating a strong need for implementation guidance. Why questions are more prevalent in error-handling contexts, reflecting conceptual challenges in debugging, while What questions are rare and mostly tied to theoretical discussions. These insights offer valuable guidance for improving developer support, tooling, and educational content in the context of mocking and unit testing.

Related papers

• Hot Topics and Common Challenges: an Empirical Study of React Discussions on Stack Overflow [0.07539652433311492]
  This study investigates the most frequently discussed keywords, error classification, and user reputation-based errors on Stack Overflow.<n>The results show the top eight most frequently used keywords on React-related questions, namely, code, link, vir, href, connect, azure, windows, and website.<n>Algorithm error is the most frequent issue faced by all groups of users, where mid-reputation users contribute the most, accounting for 55.77%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T13:49:20Z)
• MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI [59.196131618912005]
  Reasoning plays a crucial role in advancing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Existing MLLM benchmarks often fall short in precisely and comprehensively evaluating long-chain reasoning abilities.<n>We introduce MMReason, a new benchmark designed to precisely and comprehensively evaluate MLLM long-chain reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T07:14:38Z)
• Unveiling Ruby: Insights from Stack Overflow and Developer Survey [0.0]
  Ruby is a widely used open-source programming language, valued for its simplicity, especially in web development.<n>This study aims to investigate the key topics, trends, and difficulties faced by Ruby developers by analyzing over 498,000 Ruby-related questions on Stack Overflow (SO)<n>We employ BERTopic modeling and manual analysis to develop a taxonomy of 35 topics, grouped into six main categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T00:52:28Z)
• Why does in-context learning fail sometimes? Evaluating in-context learning on open and closed questions [14.999106867218572]
  We measure the performance of in-context learning as a function of task novelty and difficulty for open and closed questions. We show that counter-intuitively, a context that is more aligned with the topic does not always help more than a less relevant context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:52:30Z)
• Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision [48.60598455782159]
  We present textscPuzzleBen, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T07:39:15Z)
• Qsnail: A Questionnaire Dataset for Sequential Question Generation [76.616068047362]
  We present the first dataset specifically constructed for the questionnaire generation task, which comprises 13,168 human-written questionnaires. We conduct experiments on Qsnail, and the results reveal that retrieval models and traditional generative models do not fully align with the given research topic and intents. Despite enhancements through the chain-of-thought prompt and finetuning, questionnaires generated by language models still fall short of human-written questionnaires.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:14:10Z)
• Open-ended Commonsense Reasoning with Unrestricted Answer Scope [47.14397700770702]
  Open-ended Commonsense Reasoning is defined as solving a commonsense question without providing 1) a short list of answer candidates and 2) a pre-defined answer scope. In this work, we leverage pre-trained language models to iteratively retrieve reasoning paths on the external knowledge base. The reasoning paths can help to identify the most precise answer to the commonsense question.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T02:45:54Z)
• Answering Ambiguous Questions with a Database of Questions, Answers, and Revisions [95.92276099234344]
  We present a new state-of-the-art for answering ambiguous questions that exploits a database of unambiguous questions generated from Wikipedia. Our method improves performance by 15% on recall measures and 10% on measures which evaluate disambiguating questions from predicted outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T20:23:16Z)
• Multifaceted Improvements for Conversational Open-Domain Question Answering [54.913313912927045]
  We propose a framework with Multifaceted Improvements for Conversational open-domain Question Answering (MICQA) Firstly, the proposed KL-divergence based regularization is able to lead to a better question understanding for retrieval and answer reading. Second, the added post-ranker module can push more relevant passages to the top placements and be selected for reader with a two-aspect constrains. Third, the well designed curriculum learning strategy effectively narrows the gap between the golden passage settings of training and inference, and encourages the reader to find true answer without the golden passage assistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T07:54:27Z)
• On the Feasibility of Predicting Questions being Forgotten in Stack Overflow [1.9403536652499676]
  Questions on new technologies, technology features as well as technology versions come up and have to be answered as technology evolves. At the same time, other questions cease in importance over time, finally becoming irrelevant to users. "Forgetting" questions, which have become redundant, is an important step for keeping the Stack Overflow content concise and useful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T15:59:11Z)
• Attention-based model for predicting question relatedness on Stack Overflow [0.0]
  We propose an Attention-based Sentence pair Interaction Model (ASIM) to predict the relatedness between questions on Stack Overflow automatically. ASIM has made significant improvement over the baseline approaches in Precision, Recall, and Micro-F1 evaluation metrics. Our model also performs well in the duplicate question detection task of Ask Ubuntu.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T12:18:03Z)
• Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learning [56.771557756836906]
  We present a novel method that automatically learns a retrieval model alternately with the programmer from weak supervision. Our system leads to state-of-the-art performance on a large-scale task for complex question answering over knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T18:28:16Z)
• Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension [60.21497846332531]
  We introduce INQUISITIVE, a dataset of 19K questions that are elicited while a person is reading through a document. We show that readers engage in a series of pragmatic strategies to seek information. We evaluate question generation models based on GPT-2 and show that our model is able to generate reasonable questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T19:03:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.