Hot Topics and Common Challenges: an Empirical Study of React Discussions on Stack Overflow
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15624v1
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 13:49:20 GMT
- Title: Hot Topics and Common Challenges: an Empirical Study of React Discussions on Stack Overflow
- Authors: Yusuf Sulistyo Nugroho, Ganno Tribuana Kurniaji, Syful Islam, Mohammed Humayun Kabir, Vanesya Aura Ardity, Md. Kamal Uddin,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates the most frequently discussed keywords, error classification, and user reputation-based errors on Stack Overflow.<n>The results show the top eight most frequently used keywords on React-related questions, namely, code, link, vir, href, connect, azure, windows, and website.<n>Algorithm error is the most frequent issue faced by all groups of users, where mid-reputation users contribute the most, accounting for 55.77%.
- Score: 0.07539652433311492
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: React is a JavaScript library used to build user interfaces for single-page applications. Although recent studies have shown the popularity and advantages of React in web development, the specific challenges users face remain unknown. Thus, this study aims to analyse the React-related questions shared on Stack Overflow. The study utilizes an exploratory data analysis to investigate the most frequently discussed keywords, error classification, and user reputation-based errors, which is the novelty of this work. The results show the top eight most frequently used keywords on React-related questions, namely, code, link, vir, href, connect, azure, windows, and website. The error classification of questions from the sample shows that algorithmic error is the most frequent issue faced by all groups of users, where mid-reputation users contribute the most, accounting for 55.77%. This suggests the need for the community to provide guidance materials in solving algorithm-related problems. We expect that the results of this study will provide valuable insight into future research to support the React community during the early stages of implementation, facilitating their ability to effectively overcome challenges to adoption.
Related papers
- User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal [58.43749783815486]
We study implicit user feedback in two user-LM interaction datasets.<n>We find that the contents of user feedback can improve model performance in short human-designed questions.<n>We also find that the usefulness of user feedback is largely tied to the quality of the user's initial prompt.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T23:33:29Z) - Exploring React Library Related Questions on Stack Overflow: Answered vs. Unanswered [0.09363323206192666]
This study aims to analyze the factors associated with question answerability and difficulty levels of React-related questions on Stack Overflow (SO)<n>To facilitate our study, Exploratory Data Analysis was applied to 534,820 questions, where they are filtered based on 23 React-related tags.<n>The results show that some attributes, such as number of views, code snippet inclusion, number of lines of code, and user reputation, positively affect the likelihood of question answerability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T13:45:40Z) - Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow [0.0]
We have analyzed 25,302 questions related to Mocking on FLOW techniques.<n>We have used Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling.<n>We have analyzed the annual and relative probabilities of each category to understand the evolution of mocking-related discussions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T07:23:49Z) - QAGCF: Graph Collaborative Filtering for Q&A Recommendation [58.21387109664593]
Question and answer (Q&A) platforms usually recommend question-answer pairs to meet users' knowledge acquisition needs.
This makes user behaviors more complex, and presents two challenges for Q&A recommendation.
We introduce Question & Answer Graph Collaborative Filtering (QAGCF), a graph neural network model that creates separate graphs for collaborative and semantic views.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T10:52:37Z) - Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Survey [133.93908165922804]
We provide a systematic review of the techniques used in current conversational recommender systems (CRSs)
We summarize the key challenges of developing CRSs into five directions.
These research directions involve multiple research fields like information retrieval (IR), natural language processing (NLP), and human-computer interaction (HCI)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-23T08:53:15Z) - Features that Predict the Acceptability of Java and JavaScript Answers
on Stack Overflow [5.332217496693262]
We studied the Stack Overflow dataset by analyzing questions and answers for the two most popular tags (Java and JavaScript)
Our findings reveal that the length of code in answers, reputation of users, similarity of the text between questions and answers, and the time lag between questions and answers have the highest predictive power for differentiating accepted and unaccepted answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-08T03:09:38Z) - The Influence of Domain-Based Preprocessing on Subject-Specific
Clustering [55.41644538483948]
The sudden change of moving the majority of teaching online at Universities has caused an increased amount of workload for academics.
One way to deal with this problem is to cluster these questions depending on their topic.
In this paper, we explore the realms of tagging data sets, focusing on identifying code excerpts and providing empirical results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-16T17:47:19Z) - Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via
Alternate Meta-learning [56.771557756836906]
We present a novel method that automatically learns a retrieval model alternately with the programmer from weak supervision.
Our system leads to state-of-the-art performance on a large-scale task for complex question answering over knowledge bases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-29T18:28:16Z) - From Asking to Answering: Getting More Involved on Stack Overflow [3.1160359353275346]
This paper investigates issues on Stack Overflow, a popular question and answer community for computer programming.
We document evidence of a "leaky pipeline", specifically that there are many active users on the platform who never post an answer.
We find a user's individual features, such as their tenure, gender, and geographic location, have a significant relationship with their likelihood to post answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-08T14:41:22Z) - Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question
Answering [92.45607094299181]
We make the first study to explore the correlation between user behavior and passage relevance.
Our approach significantly improves the accuracy of passage ranking without extra human labeled data.
In practice, this work has proved effective to substantially reduce the human labeling cost for the QA service in a global commercial search engine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-13T07:02:08Z) - Automating App Review Response Generation [67.58267006314415]
We propose a novel approach RRGen that automatically generates review responses by learning knowledge relations between reviews and their responses.
Experiments on 58 apps and 309,246 review-response pairs highlight that RRGen outperforms the baselines by at least 67.4% in terms of BLEU-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T05:23:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.