IterKey: Iterative Keyword Generation with LLMs for Enhanced Retrieval Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08450v2
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:11:59 GMT
• Title: IterKey: Iterative Keyword Generation with LLMs for Enhanced Retrieval Augmented Generation
• Authors: Kazuki Hayashi, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Shinya Kouda, Taro Watanabe,
• Abstract summary: IterKey is an iterative keyword generation framework that enhances RAG via sparse retrieval.<n>It achieves 5% to 20% accuracy improvements over BM25-based RAG and simple baselines.
• Score: 24.108631023133704
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a way to complement the in-context knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external documents. However, real-world applications demand not only accuracy but also interpretability. While dense retrieval methods provide high accuracy, they lack interpretability; conversely, sparse retrieval methods offer transparency but often fail to capture the full intent of queries due to their reliance on keyword matching. To address these issues, we introduce IterKey, an LLM-driven iterative keyword generation framework that enhances RAG via sparse retrieval. IterKey consists of three LLM-driven stages: generating keywords for retrieval, generating answers based on retrieved documents, and validating the answers. If validation fails, the process iteratively repeats with refined keywords. Across four QA tasks, experimental results show that IterKey achieves 5% to 20% accuracy improvements over BM25-based RAG and simple baselines. Its performance is comparable to dense retrieval-based RAG and prior iterative query refinement methods using dense models. In summary, IterKey is a novel BM25-based approach leveraging LLMs to iteratively refine RAG, effectively balancing accuracy with interpretability.

Related papers

• AlignCoder: Aligning Retrieval with Target Intent for Repository-Level Code Completion [55.21541958868449]
  We propose AlignCoder, a repository-level code completion framework.<n>Our framework generates an enhanced query that bridges the semantic gap between the initial query and the target code.<n>We employ reinforcement learning to train an AlignRetriever that learns to leverage inference information in the enhanced query for more accurate retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T15:23:14Z)
• Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation [49.87723664806526]
  We present the first systematic comparison of prompting-based and RL-based query augmentation across diverse benchmarks.<n>We introduce a novel hybrid method, On-policy Pseudo-document Query Expansion (OPQE), which learns to generate a pseudo-document that maximizes retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T04:16:28Z)
• Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
  ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Representation Consistency for Accurate and Coherent LLM Answer Aggregation [20.494987341489573]
  representation consistency (RC) is a test-time scaling method for aggregating answers drawn from multiple candidate responses of an large language model.<n>RC enhances answer aggregation by considering the number of occurrences of each answer in the candidate response set.<n>Our method only uses cached activations and lightweight similarity computations and requires no additional model queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T05:07:47Z)
• Optimizing Retrieval Augmented Generation for Object Constraint Language [3.4777703321218225]
  OCL is essential for Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) but manually writing OCL rules is complex and time-consuming.<n>We evaluate the impact of three different retrieval strategies on $OCLBERT generation.<n>We show that while retrieval can enhance generation accuracy, its effectiveness depends on the retrieval method and the number of retrieved chunks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T14:00:10Z)
• LevelRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Multi-hop Logic Planning over Rewriting Augmented Searchers [24.01783076521377]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a crucial method for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Existing RAG methods typically employ query rewriting to clarify the user intent and manage multi-hop logic, while using hybrid retrieval to expand search scope.<n>We introduce a high-level searcher that decomposes complex queries into atomic queries, independent of any retriever-specific optimizations.<n>To harness the strengths of sparse retrievers for precise keyword retrieval, we have developed a new sparse searcher that employs Lucene syntax to enhance retrieval accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T12:09:16Z)
• Learning More Effective Representations for Dense Retrieval through Deliberate Thinking Before Search [65.53881294642451]
  Deliberate Thinking based Dense Retriever (DEBATER)<n>DEBATER enhances recent dense retrievers by enabling them to learn more effective document representations through a step-by-step thinking process.<n> Experimental results show that DEBATER significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:56:34Z)
• Optimizing Query Generation for Enhanced Document Retrieval in RAG [53.10369742545479]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various language tasks but they often generate incorrect information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to mitigate this by using document retrieval for accurate responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:50:32Z)
• SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMs [85.54906813106683]
  We propose a simple yet effective framework to enhance open-domain question answering (ODQA) with large language models (LLMs) SuRe helps LLMs predict more accurate answers for a given question, which are well-supported by the summarized retrieval (SuRe) Experimental results on diverse ODQA benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of SuRe, with improvements of up to 4.6% in exact match (EM) and 4.0% in F1 score over standard prompting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T01:15:54Z)
• Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems. We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies. Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z)
• Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z)
• Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model [58.64141622176841]
  We propose Listwise Reranker with a Large Language Model (LRL), which achieves strong reranking effectiveness without using any task-specific training data. Experiments on three TREC web search datasets demonstrate that LRL not only outperforms zero-shot pointwise methods when reranking first-stage retrieval results, but can also act as a final-stage reranker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T14:45:34Z)
• Large Language Models are Strong Zero-Shot Retriever [89.16756291653371]
  We propose a simple method that applies a large language model (LLM) to large-scale retrieval in zero-shot scenarios. Our method, the Language language model as Retriever (LameR), is built upon no other neural models but an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T14:45:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.