The Impact of International Collaborations with Highly Publishing Countries in Computer Science
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09776v1
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:15:45 GMT
- Title: The Impact of International Collaborations with Highly Publishing Countries in Computer Science
- Authors: Alberto Gomez Espes, Michael Faerber, Adam Jatowt,
- Abstract summary: This paper analyzes international collaborations in Computer Science, focusing on three major players: China, the European Union, and the United States.<n>We examine collaboration patterns, research impact, retraction rates, and the role of the Development Index in shaping research outcomes.
- Score: 15.144785147549713
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper analyzes international collaborations in Computer Science, focusing on three major players: China, the European Union, and the United States. Drawing from a comprehensive literature review, we examine collaboration patterns, research impact, retraction rates, and the role of the Development Index in shaping research outcomes. Our findings show that while China, the EU, and the US lead global research efforts, other regions are narrowing the gap in publication volume. Collaborations involving these key regions tend to have lower retraction rates, reflecting stronger adherence to scientific standards. We also find that countries with a Very High Development Index contribute to research with higher citation rates and fewer retractions. Overall, this study highlights the value of international collaboration and the importance of inclusive, ethical practices in advancing global research in Computer Science.
Related papers
- Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled.
We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z) - ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.<n>ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.<n>We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z) - Evolving landscape of US-China science collaboration: Convergence and
divergence [0.0]
The US and China have significantly fortified their collaboration across diverse scientific disciplines.
Recent reports hint at a potential decline in collaboration between these two giants.
This study delves into the evolving landscape of interaction between the US and China over recent decades.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T14:11:46Z) - Diversity of Expertise is Key to Scientific Impact: a Large-Scale
Analysis in the Field of Computer Science [1.8794304012790348]
We analysed how the diversity of research fields within a research team relates to the number of citations their papers received in the upcoming 5 years.
This suggests that, at least in Computer Science, diversity of expertise is key to scientific impact.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T09:56:44Z) - Assessing Scientific Contributions in Data Sharing Spaces [64.16762375635842]
This paper introduces the SCIENCE-index, a blockchain-based metric measuring a researcher's scientific contributions.
To incentivize researchers to share their data, the SCIENCE-index is augmented to include a data-sharing parameter.
Our model is evaluated by comparing the distribution of its output for geographically diverse researchers to that of the h-index.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-18T19:17:47Z) - A half-century of global collaboration in science and the 'Shrinking
World' [0.0]
This paper provides unique evidence of how international collaboration clusters have formed and evolved over the past 50 years across various scientific publications.
We first examine how the global presence of top-tier countries has changed in 15 natural science disciplines over time, as measured by publication volumes and international collaboration rates.
We then perform a hierarchical clustering to analyse and visualise the international collaboration clusters for each discipline and period.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-08T18:15:23Z) - Research on Domain Information Mining and Theme Evolution of Scientific
Papers [5.747583451398117]
Cross-disciplinary research results have gradually become an emerging frontier research direction.
How to effectively use the huge number of scientific papers to help researchers becomes a challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-18T14:36:17Z) - Internationalizing AI: Evolution and Impact of Distance Factors [6.045548929961739]
International collaboration in the field of AI is not prevalent (only 15.7%)
The United States and China have promoted the international collaboration in the field of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T00:44:53Z) - Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators
for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines.
We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA.
FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z) - Brain Drain and Brain Gain in Russia: Analyzing International Migration
of Researchers by Discipline using Scopus Bibliometric Data 1996-2020 [77.34726150561087]
We analyze all researchers who have published with a Russian affiliation address in Scopus-indexed sources in 1996-2020.
While Russia was a donor country in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it has experienced a relatively balanced circulation of researchers in more recent years.
Overall, researchers emigrating from Russia outnumbered and outperformed researchers immigrating to Russia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T12:47:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.