Can AI automatically analyze public opinion? A LLM agents-based agentic pipeline for timely public opinion analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11401v1
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:09:28 GMT
- Title: Can AI automatically analyze public opinion? A LLM agents-based agentic pipeline for timely public opinion analysis
- Abstract summary: This study proposes and implements the first LLM agents based agentic pipeline for multi task public opinion analysis.<n>Unlike traditional methods, it offers an end-to-end, fully automated analytical workflow without requiring domain specific training data.<n>It enables timely, integrated public opinion analysis through a single natural language query.
- Score: 3.1894345568992346
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This study proposes and implements the first LLM agents based agentic pipeline for multi task public opinion analysis. Unlike traditional methods, it offers an end-to-end, fully automated analytical workflow without requiring domain specific training data, manual annotation, or local deployment. The pipeline integrates advanced LLM capabilities into a low-cost, user-friendly framework suitable for resource constrained environments. It enables timely, integrated public opinion analysis through a single natural language query, making it accessible to non-expert users. To validate its effectiveness, the pipeline was applied to a real world case study of the 2025 U.S. China tariff dispute, where it analyzed 1,572 Weibo posts and generated a structured, multi part analytical report. The results demonstrate some relationships between public opinion and governmental decision-making. These contributions represent a novel advancement in applying generative AI to public governance, bridging the gap between technical sophistication and practical usability in public opinion monitoring.
Related papers
- LLM-based Models for Detecting Emerging Topics in Service Feedback [1.5484595752241122]
This paper presents a novel methodology that integrates large language models (LLMs), statistical techniques, and human-AI collaboration to improve multilingual customer feedback analysis.<n>The primary objective is to detect emerging service quality topics that may also reveal potential inequities in service delivery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T04:46:11Z) - Agentic Analysis for Agentic Infrastructure: An LLM-Powered Pipeline for Comparative Governance of DAO and Corporate AI Protocols [5.209373486278134]
We introduce an LLM-powered comparative pipeline for large-scale governance discourse analysis.<n>We validate it on two contrasting standards for agent interoperability: ERC-8004 (permissionless, on-chain) and Google A2A (corporate-led)<n>We find that while governance form influences substantive focus, both regimes exhibit comparable levels of participation inequality and community fragmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-24T16:34:54Z) - AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction [54.10819421625103]
AIPO enables the policy model to proactively consult three functional collaborative agents when encountering reasoning bottlenecks.<n>AIPO consistently improves reasoning performance, generalizes robustly across different policy models and RLVR algorithms, and effectively expands the reasoning capability boundary of the policy model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T19:06:55Z) - LongDA: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Document Data Analysis [55.32211515932351]
LongDA targets real-world settings in which navigating long documentation and complex data is the primary bottleneck.<n>LongTA is a tool-augmented agent framework that enables document access, retrieval, and code execution.<n>Our experiments reveal substantial performance gaps even among state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T23:23:16Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - Leveraging LLMs for Semi-Automatic Corpus Filtration in Systematic Literature Reviews [5.911820207772152]
We propose a pipeline leveraging multiple large language models (LLMs), classifying papers based on descriptive prompts and deciding jointly.<n>The entire process is human-supervised and interactively controlled via our open-source visual analytics web interface, LLMSurver.<n>Results demonstrate that our pipeline significantly reduces manual effort while achieving lower error rates than single human annotators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T13:48:29Z) - Audit, Alignment, and Optimization of LM-Powered Subroutines with Application to Public Comment Processing [2.0417058495510374]
We propose a framework for declaring LM-powered subroutines for use within conventional asynchronous code.<n>We use this framework to develop "CommentNEPA," an application that compiles, organizes, and summarizes a corpus of public commentary submitted in response to a project requiring environmental review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T18:52:09Z) - ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [54.52092001110694]
ThinkGeo is a benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>Inspired by tool-interaction paradigms, ThinkGeo includes human-curated queries spanning a wide range of real-world applications.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z) - Real-Time Sentiment Insights from X Using VADER, DistilBERT, and Web-Scraped Data [0.0]
This paper presents a comprehensive sentiment analysis system tailored for corporate reputation monitoring.<n>It combines Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to accurately interpret public opinion in real time.<n>Our analysis reveals significant disparities in public sentiment across major corporations, with companies like Amazon (81.2) and Samsung (45.8) receiving excellent sentiment scores, while Microsoft (21.7) and Walmart (21.9) exhibit poor sentiment profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T21:33:55Z) - LLM-Generated Heuristics for AI Planning: Do We Even Need Domain-Independence Anymore? [87.71321254733384]
Large language models (LLMs) can generate planning approaches tailored to specific planning problems.<n>LLMs can achieve state-of-the-art performance on some standard IPC domains.<n>We discuss whether these results signify a paradigm shift and how they can complement existing planning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T22:21:12Z) - Transit Pulse: Utilizing Social Media as a Source for Customer Feedback and Information Extraction with Large Language Model [12.6020349733674]
We propose a novel approach to extracting and analyzing transit-related information.
Our method employs Large Language Models (LLM), specifically Llama 3, for a streamlined analysis.
Our results demonstrate the potential of LLMs to transform social media data analysis in the public transit domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T07:08:40Z) - Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs [3.059256166047627]
PAPEL (Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs) is a framework harnessing the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the analysis of privacy policies.
It aims to streamline the extraction, annotation, and summarization of information from these policies, enhancing their accessibility and comprehensibility without requiring additional model training.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of PAPEL with two applications: (i) annotation and (ii) contradiction analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T10:23:31Z) - Large Language Model as a Catalyst: A Paradigm Shift in Base Station Siting Optimization [62.16747639440893]
Large language models (LLMs) and their associated technologies advance, particularly in the realms of prompt engineering and agent engineering.<n>Our proposed framework incorporates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance the system's ability to acquire domain-specific knowledge and generate solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T08:43:32Z) - WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence.<n>WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z) - Sentiment Analysis through LLM Negotiations [58.67939611291001]
A standard paradigm for sentiment analysis is to rely on a singular LLM and makes the decision in a single round.
This paper introduces a multi-LLM negotiation framework for sentiment analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:35:29Z) - A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents [105.2509166861984]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence.<n>This paper delivers a systematic review of the field of LLM-based autonomous agents from a holistic perspective.<n>We present a comprehensive overview of the diverse applications of LLM-based autonomous agents in the fields of social science, natural science, and engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T13:30:37Z) - Paradigm Shift in Sustainability Disclosure Analysis: Empowering
Stakeholders with CHATREPORT, a Language Model-Based Tool [10.653984116770234]
This paper introduces a novel approach to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) with expert knowledge to automate the analysis of corporate sustainability reports.
We christen our tool CHATREPORT, and apply it in a first use case to assess corporate climate risk disclosures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T14:46:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.