EAMET: Robust Massive Model Editing via Embedding Alignment Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11876v2
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:16:56 GMT
• Title: EAMET: Robust Massive Model Editing via Embedding Alignment Optimization
• Authors: Yanbo Dai, Zhenlan Ji, Zongjie Li, Shuai Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose EAMET (Embedding Alignment Model Editing in Transformers) to address the embedding misalignment among knowledge items.<n>Experiments show that EAMET consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving about 90% editing efficacy when editing 10k facts.
• Score: 12.022506016268112
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model editing techniques are essential for efficiently updating knowledge in large language models (LLMs). However, the effectiveness of existing approaches degrades in massive editing scenarios, particularly when evaluated with practical metrics. Their robustness is also limited in context-rich settings or when editing multiple facts of the same subject simultaneously. We attribute these failures to the embedding misalignment among knowledge items, which undermines editing reliability at scale. To address this, we propose EAMET (Embedding Alignment Model Editing in Transformers), which addresses this issue by aligning the space of key and residual embeddings. Extensive experiments across six LLMs and three datasets demonstrate that EAMET consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving about 90\% editing efficacy when editing 10k facts. Codes and datasets are publicly available at https://ybdai7.github.io/eamet-page/.

Related papers

• EMSEdit: Efficient Multi-Step Meta-Learning-based Model Editing [20.6706431279733]
  EMSEdit is a lightweight alternative to meta-learning-based model editing.<n>We show that EMSEdit consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both sequential and batch editing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T01:54:58Z)
• Model Merging for Knowledge Editing [53.799891745131724]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) require continuous updates to maintain accurate and current knowledge as the world evolves.<n>Existing knowledge editing approaches offer various solutions for knowledge updating, but they often struggle with sequential editing scenarios.<n>This paper proposes a two-stage framework combining robust supervised fine-tuning (R-SFT) with model merging for knowledge editing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T07:42:39Z)
• MEMOIR: Lifelong Model Editing with Minimal Overwrite and Informed Retention for LLMs [82.34547399693966]
  Existing methods for lifelong model editing compromise generalization, interfere with past edits, or fail to scale to long editing sequences.<n>We propose MEMOIR, a novel scalable framework that injects knowledge through a residual memory.<n>MeMOIR confines each edit to a distinct subset of the memory parameters, minimizing interference among edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T16:16:42Z)
• One for All: Update Parameterized Knowledge Across Multiple Models [35.137065486616805]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode vast world knowledge but struggle to stay up-to-date, often leading to errors and hallucinations.<n> Knowledge editing offers an efficient alternative to retraining, enabling targeted modifications by updating specific model parameters.<n>We propose OnceEdit, a novel ensemble-based approach that employs a plug-in model as the editing module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T03:48:54Z)
• InComeS: Integrating Compression and Selection Mechanisms into LLMs for Efficient Model Editing [77.47790551485721]
  In-context learning is a promising editing method by comprehending edit information through context encoding.<n>This method is constrained by the limited context window of large language models.<n>We propose InComeS, a flexible framework that enhances LLMs' ability to process editing contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T09:20:18Z)
• The Mirage of Model Editing: Revisiting Evaluation in the Wild [70.17413507444704]
  We introduce QAEdit, a new benchmark aligned with widely used question answering (QA) datasets, and WILD, a task-agnostic evaluation framework.<n>Our single editing experiments show that current editing methods perform substantially worse than previously reported.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:57:55Z)
• MEMIT-Merge: Addressing MEMIT's Key-Value Conflicts in Same-Subject Batch Editing for LLMs [37.374258713584496]
  We show that MEMIT's editing efficacy significantly deteriorates when processing batches containing multiple edits sharing the same subject.<n>We propose MEMIT-Merge, an enhanced approach that merges value processes for facts sharing the same subject.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T07:42:09Z)
• AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Models [76.28789588247659]
  We propose AnyEdit, a new autoregressive editing paradigm for large language models (LLMs)<n>It decomposes long-form knowledge into sequential chunks and iteratively edits the key token in each chunk, ensuring consistent and accurate outputs.<n>It outperforms strong baselines by 21.5% on benchmarks including UnKEBench, AKEW, and our new EditEverything dataset for long-form diverse-formatted knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T16:18:37Z)
• Joint Localization and Activation Editing for Low-Resource Fine-Tuning [73.64004083269424]
  We propose a joint localization and activation editing (JoLA) method.<n>JoLA learns (1) which heads in the Transformer to edit (2) whether the intervention should be additive, multiplicative, or both and (3) the intervention parameters themselves.<n>We demonstrate that JoLA consistently outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:13:09Z)
• FAME: Towards Factual Multi-Task Model Editing [4.858226284963096]
  Large language models (LLMs) embed extensive knowledge and utilize it to perform exceptionally well across various tasks. We present FAME, an factual, comprehensive, and multi-task dataset, which is designed to enhance the practicality of model editing. We then propose SKEME, a model editing method that uses a novel caching mechanism to ensure synchronization with the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T13:46:06Z)
• Better Call SAUL: Fluent and Consistent Language Model Editing with Generation Regularization [48.07144492109635]
  Large language models need to be updated regularly. Model editing is challenging as it might also affect knowledge that is unrelated to the new data. We propose SAUL, a streamlined model editing method that uses sentence concatenation with augmented random facts for generation regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T12:28:13Z)
• ELDER: Enhancing Lifelong Model Editing with Mixture-of-LoRA [55.697627106315004]
  Large language models (LLMs) require model editing to efficiently update specific knowledge within them and avoid factual errors.<n>Previous approaches manage sequential edits by freezing original parameters and discretely allocating new parameters for each knowledge update.<n>We propose ELDER, a novel approach to create a continuous association between data and adapters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T02:27:00Z)
• The Butterfly Effect of Model Editing: Few Edits Can Trigger Large Language Models Collapse [58.0132400208411]
  Even a single edit can trigger model collapse, manifesting as significant performance degradation in various benchmark tasks. benchmarking Large Language Models after each edit is impractically time-consuming and resource-intensive. We have utilized GPT-3.5 to develop a new dataset, HardEdit, based on hard cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T01:50:38Z)
• SWEA: Updating Factual Knowledge in Large Language Models via Subject Word Embedding Altering [17.20346072074533]
  Recent model editing is a promising technique for efficiently updating a small amount of knowledge of large language models.<n>We propose a detachable and expandable Subject Word Embedding Altering (SWEA) framework, which finds the editing embeddings through token-level matching.<n>We demonstrate the overall state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance of SWEA$oplus$OS on the CounterFact and zsRE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T13:08:45Z)
• Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [51.903537096207]
  This paper embarks on a deep exploration of the problems, methods, and opportunities related to model editing for LLMs. We provide an exhaustive overview of the task definition and challenges associated with model editing, along with an in-depth empirical analysis of the most progressive methods currently at our disposal. Our objective is to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and feasibility of each editing technique, thereby assisting the community in making informed decisions on the selection of the most appropriate method for a specific task or context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T16:00:00Z)
• Memory-Based Model Editing at Scale [102.28475739907498]
  Existing model editors struggle to accurately model an edit's intended scope. We propose Semi-Parametric Editing with a Retrieval-Augmented Counterfactual Model (SERAC) SERAC stores edits in an explicit memory and learns to reason over them to modulate the base model's predictions as needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T23:40:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.