Selective Code Generation for Functional Guarantees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13553v1
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 06:29:16 GMT
• Title: Selective Code Generation for Functional Guarantees
• Authors: Jaewoo Jeong, Taesoo Kim, Sangdon Park,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) show human-level performance and their specialized descendants, code generation models, play core roles in solving complex tasks.<n> hallucination of code generation models is rarely considered.
• Score: 13.0038589319782
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show human-level performance and their specialized descendants, code generation models, play core roles in solving complex tasks, including mathematical reasoning and software development. On the downside, the hallucination of LLMs mainly hinders their applicability to systems requiring higher safety standards, thus drawing the attention of the AI community. However, the hallucination of code generation models is rarely considered. One critical bottleneck in considering code hallucination is the intricate property of code to identify whether generated code has the intended functionality due to its un-natural form, different to natural languages. Handful of unit tests have been considered to address this issue, but scaling-up its size is extremely expensive. We address this core bottleneck by automatically generating unit tests using dynamic code analysis tools, which leverages the \emph{executable nature} of code. Given generated unit tests from true code for measuring functional correctness of generated code, we propose to learn a \emph{selective code generator}, which abstains from answering for unsure generation, to control the rate of code hallucination among non-abstaining answers in terms of a false discovery rate. This learning algorithm provides a controllability guarantee, providing trustworthiness of code generation. Finally, we propose to use generated unit tests in evaluation as well as in learning for precise code evaluation, calling this evaluation paradigm \emph{FuzzEval}. We demonstrate the efficacy of our selective code generator over open and closed code generators, showing clear benefit of leveraging generated unit tests along with the controllability of code hallucination and reasonable selection efficiency via our selective code generator.

Related papers

• IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
  The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation [20.013757490442064]
  We introduce CodeIF, the first benchmark designed to assess the abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to adhere to task-oriented instructions.<n>CodeIF encompasses a broad range of tasks, including function synthesis, algorithmic instructions, and code explanation.<n>We conduct extensive experiments with LLMs, analyzing their strengths and limitations in meeting the demands of these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T14:19:49Z)
• GenX: Mastering Code and Test Generation with Execution Feedback [7.225594526057816]
  We propose a novel approach that concurrently trains a code generation model and a test generation model.<n>We introduce two strategies for test and code data augmentation and a new scoring function for code and test ranking.<n>The results demonstrate that our models, when iteratively trained with an increasing number of test cases and code solutions, outperform those trained on the original dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T03:18:21Z)
• CodeSift: An LLM-Based Reference-Less Framework for Automatic Code Validation [3.22798929957223]
  Large language models (LLMs) have greatly facilitated code generation, but ensuring the functional correctness of generated code remains a challenge. Traditional validation methods are often time-consuming, error-prone, and impractical for large volumes of code. We introduce CodeSift, a novel framework that leverages LLMs as the first-line filter of code validation without the need for execution, reference code, or human feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T08:32:21Z)
• SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents [10.730852617039451]
  We investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents to formalize user issues into test cases.<n>We propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth bug-fixes, and golden tests.<n>We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases, with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed for test generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:54:37Z)
• Comments as Natural Logic Pivots: Improve Code Generation via Comment Perspective [85.48043537327258]
  We propose MANGO (comMents As Natural loGic pivOts), including a comment contrastive training strategy and a corresponding logical comment decoding strategy. Results indicate that MANGO significantly improves the code pass rate based on the strong baselines. The robustness of the logical comment decoding strategy is notably higher than the Chain-of-thoughts prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T08:30:46Z)
• Test-Driven Development for Code Generation [0.850206009406913]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in generating code snippets directly from problem statements. This paper investigates if and how Test-Driven Development (TDD) can be incorporated into AI-assisted code-generation processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:10:12Z)
• StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
  We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components. CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks. FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization. Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z)
• Code Execution with Pre-trained Language Models [88.04688617516827]
  Most pre-trained models for code intelligence ignore the execution trace and only rely on source code and syntactic structures. We develop a mutation-based data augmentation technique to create a large-scale and realistic Python dataset and task for code execution. We then present CodeExecutor, a Transformer model that leverages code execution pre-training and curriculum learning to enhance its semantic comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T10:00:05Z)
• ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models [90.10436771217243]
  We propose ReCode, a comprehensive robustness evaluation benchmark for code generation models. We customize over 30 transformations specifically for code on docstrings, function and variable names, code syntax, and code format. With human annotators, we verified that over 90% of the perturbed prompts do not alter the semantic meaning of the original prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T14:11:31Z)
• Enhancing Semantic Code Search with Multimodal Contrastive Learning and Soft Data Augmentation [50.14232079160476]
  We propose a new approach with multimodal contrastive learning and soft data augmentation for code search. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on a large-scale dataset with six programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T08:49:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.