Game-RL: Synthesizing Multimodal Verifiable Game Data to Boost VLMs' General Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13886v5
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 14:36:59 GMT
- Title: Game-RL: Synthesizing Multimodal Verifiable Game Data to Boost VLMs' General Reasoning
- Authors: Jingqi Tong, Jixin Tang, Hangcheng Li, Yurong Mou, Ming Zhang, Jun Zhao, Yanbo Wen, Fan Song, Jiahao Zhan, Yuyang Lu, Chaoran Tao, Zhiyuan Guo, Jizhou Yu, Tianhao Cheng, Zhiheng Xi, Changhao Jiang, Zhangyue Yin, Yining Zheng, Weifeng Ge, Guanhua Chen, Tao Gui, Xipeng Qiu, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang,
- Abstract summary: Vision-language reinforcement learning (RL) has primarily focused on narrow domains.<n>We find video games inherently provide rich visual elements and mechanics that are easy to verify.<n>To fully use the multimodal and verifiable reward in video games, we propose Game-RL.
- Score: 89.93384726755106
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision-language reinforcement learning (RL) has primarily focused on narrow domains (e.g. geometry or chart reasoning). This leaves broader training scenarios and resources underexplored, limiting the exploration and learning of Vision Language Models (VLMs) through RL. We find video games inherently provide rich visual elements and mechanics that are easy to verify. To fully use the multimodal and verifiable reward in video games, we propose Game-RL, constructing diverse game tasks for RL training to boost VLMs general reasoning ability. To obtain training data, we propose Code2Logic, a novel approach that adapts game code to synthesize game reasoning task data, thus obtaining the GameQA dataset of 30 games and 158 tasks with controllable difficulty gradation. Unexpectedly, RL training solely on GameQA enables multiple VLMs to achieve performance improvements across 7 diverse vision-language benchmarks, demonstrating the value of Game-RL for enhancing VLMs' general reasoning. Furthermore, this suggests that video games may serve as valuable scenarios and resources to boost general reasoning abilities. Our code, dataset and models are available at the GitHub repository.
Related papers
- IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z) - Fly, Fail, Fix: Iterative Game Repair with Reinforcement Learning and Large Multimodal Models [7.989185500830854]
Game design hinges on understanding how static rules and content translate into dynamic player behavior.<n>We present an automated design framework that closes this gap by pairing a reinforcement learning (RL) agent, which playtests the game, with a large multimodal model (LMM)<n>The LMM designer receives a gameplay goal and the current game configuration, analyses the play traces, and edits the configuration to steer future behaviour toward the goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-16T22:45:40Z) - Function-to-Style Guidance of LLMs for Code Translation [59.487054943812836]
We propose F2STrans, a function-to-style guiding paradigm designed to improve the performance of large language models in code translation.<n>Our approach comprises two key stages: (1) Functional learning, which optimize translation correctness using high-quality source-target code pairs.<n>We introduce a novel code translation benchmark that includes up-to-date source code, extensive test cases, and manually annotated ground-truth translations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T08:25:02Z) - Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess [54.5355907369231]
We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can develop strategic reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning (RL) in chess.<n>Our experiments show that our distillation-based dense rewards often outperform sparse binary rewards.<n>We provide SFT and RL ablations on chess reasoning training and find evidence that this limitation stems from a deficit in the pretrained models' internal understanding of chess.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T13:16:34Z) - Play to Generalize: Learning to Reason Through Game Play [18.085614901290427]
We propose a novel post-training method, Visual Game Learning (ViGaL), where MLLMs develop generalizable reasoning skills through playing arcade-like games.<n>Our findings suggest that multimodal reasoning can emerge from gameplay, pointing to a promising strategy of designing surrogate tasks for RL post-training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T17:59:57Z) - Orak: A Foundational Benchmark for Training and Evaluating LLM Agents on Diverse Video Games [29.194229891848853]
Orak is a benchmark designed to train and evaluate Large Language Model (LLM) agents across diverse real-world video games.<n>To support consistent evaluation of LLMs, we introduce a plug-and-play interface based on Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>Orak offers a comprehensive evaluation framework, encompassing general game score leaderboards, LLM battle arenas, and in-depth analyses of visual input state, agentic strategies, and fine-tuning effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T06:40:33Z) - CodeSense: a Real-World Benchmark and Dataset for Code Semantic Reasoning [20.06743818187144]
We propose CodeSense, the first benchmark that makes available a spectrum of fine-grained code reasoning tasks.<n>Our results show a clear performance gap for the models to handle fine-grained reasoning tasks.<n>Our work produced an execution tracing framework and tool set that make it easy to collect ground truth for fine-grained SE reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T23:32:01Z) - G1: Bootstrapping Perception and Reasoning Abilities of Vision-Language Model via Reinforcement Learning [37.18982308118744]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel in many direct multimodal tasks but struggle to translate this prowess into effective decision-making within interactive, visually rich environments like games.<n>We introduce VLM-Gym, a curated reinforcement learning environment featuring diverse visual games with unified interfaces and adjustable, compositional difficulty.<n>We train G0 models using pure RL-driven self-evolution, which demonstrate emergent perception and reasoning patterns.<n>Our resulting G1 models consistently surpass their teacher across all games and outperform leading proprietary models like Claude-3.7-Sonnet-Thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T17:54:39Z) - Specification-Driven Code Translation Powered by Large Language Models: How Far Are We? [8.534857249221844]
We investigate using NL-specification as an intermediate representation for code translation.<n>Our results show that using NL-specification alone does not lead to performance improvements.<n>Besides analyzing the performance of code translation, we also investigate the quality of the translated code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T20:10:21Z) - Crystal: Illuminating LLM Abilities on Language and Code [58.5467653736537]
We propose a pretraining strategy to enhance the integration of natural language and coding capabilities.
The resulting model, Crystal, demonstrates remarkable capabilities in both domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:28:46Z) - Distill Visual Chart Reasoning Ability from LLMs to MLLMs [38.62832112530892]
Solving complex chart Q&A tasks requires advanced visual reasoning abilities in multimodal large language models (MLLMs)
We propose Code-as-Intermediary Translation (CIT), a cost-effective, efficient and easily scalable data synthesis method for distilling visual reasoning abilities from LLMs to MLLMs.
We employ text-based synthesizing techniques to construct chart-plotting code and produce ReachQA, a dataset containing 3k reasoning-intensive charts and 20k Q&A pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T14:50:42Z) - Steering Large Language Models between Code Execution and Textual Reasoning [22.279107036500083]
Textual reasoning has inherent limitations in solving tasks with challenges in math, logics, optimization, and searching.<n>OpenAI GPT Code Interpreter and multi-agent frameworks such as AutoGen have demonstrated remarkable proficiency of integrating code generation and execution.<n>We propose three methods to better steer LLM code/text generation and achieve a notable improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T15:44:47Z) - VersiCode: Towards Version-controllable Code Generation [58.82709231906735]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made tremendous strides in code generation, but existing research fails to account for the dynamic nature of software development.
We propose two novel tasks aimed at bridging this gap: version-specific code completion (VSCC) and version-aware code migration (VACM)
We conduct an extensive evaluation on VersiCode, which reveals that version-controllable code generation is indeed a significant challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T16:15:06Z) - CodeGRAG: Bridging the Gap between Natural Language and Programming Language via Graphical Retrieval Augmented Generation [58.84212778960507]
CodeGRAG builds the graphical view of code blocks based on the control flow and data flow of them to better interpret the programming domain knowledge.<n>CodeGRAG significantly improves the code generation ability of LLMs and can even offer performance gain for cross-lingual code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T02:48:55Z) - How Far Have We Gone in Binary Code Understanding Using Large Language Models [51.527805834378974]
We propose a benchmark to evaluate the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in binary code understanding.
Our evaluations reveal that existing LLMs can understand binary code to a certain extent, thereby improving the efficiency of binary code analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T14:44:08Z) - CodeMind: A Framework to Challenge Large Language Models for Code Reasoning [1.4027589547318842]
We introduce CodeMind, a framework designed to gauge the code reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
CodeMind supports three code reasoning tasks: Independent Execution Reasoning (IER), Dependent Execution Reasoning (DER), and Specification Reasoning (SR)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T02:24:46Z) - Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewards [68.52824755339806]
We investigate the feasibility of using off-the-shelf vision-language models, or VLMs, as sources of rewards for reinforcement learning agents.
We show how rewards for visual achievement of a variety of language goals can be derived from the CLIP family of models, and used to train RL agents that can achieve a variety of language goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-14T18:06:17Z) - SPRING: Studying the Paper and Reasoning to Play Games [102.5587155284795]
We propose a novel approach, SPRING, to read the game's original academic paper and use the knowledge learned to reason and play the game through a large language model (LLM)
In experiments, we study the quality of in-context "reasoning" induced by different forms of prompts under the setting of the Crafter open-world environment.
Our experiments suggest that LLMs, when prompted with consistent chain-of-thought, have great potential in completing sophisticated high-level trajectories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T18:14:35Z) - Reinforcement Learning Friendly Vision-Language Model for Minecraft [31.863271032186038]
We propose a novel cross-modal contrastive learning framework architecture, CLIP4MC.
We aim to learn a reinforcement learning (RL) friendly vision-language model (VLM) that serves as an intrinsic reward function for open-ended tasks.
We demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better performance on RL tasks compared with baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-19T05:20:52Z) - Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Verilog RTL Code
Generation [21.747037230069854]
We characterize the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate useful Verilog.
We construct an evaluation framework comprising test-benches for functional analysis and a flow to test the syntax of Verilog code.
Our findings show that across our problem scenarios, the fine-tuning results in LLMs more capable of producing syntactically correct code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T16:34:39Z) - DeepCrawl: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Turn-based Strategy Games [137.86426963572214]
We introduce DeepCrawl, a fully-playable Roguelike prototype for iOS and Android in which all agents are controlled by policy networks trained using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL)
Our aim is to understand whether recent advances in DRL can be used to develop convincing behavioral models for non-player characters in videogames.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-03T13:53:29Z) - The NetHack Learning Environment [79.06395964379107]
We present the NetHack Learning Environment (NLE), a procedurally generated rogue-like environment for Reinforcement Learning research.
We argue that NetHack is sufficiently complex to drive long-term research on problems such as exploration, planning, skill acquisition, and language-conditioned RL.
We demonstrate empirical success for early stages of the game using a distributed Deep RL baseline and Random Network Distillation exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-24T14:12:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.