Visual Instruction Bottleneck Tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13946v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 03:05:33 GMT
• Title: Visual Instruction Bottleneck Tuning
• Authors: Changdae Oh, Jiatong Li, Shawn Im, Sharon Li,
• Abstract summary: multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer performance degradation when encountering unfamiliar queries under distribution shifts.<n>We take an alternative approach to enhance the generalization and robustness of MLLMs from a representation learning perspective.<n>Inspired by information bottleneck (IB) principle, we derive a variational lower bound of the IB for MLLMs and devise a practical implementation, Visual Instruction Bottleneck Tuning (Vittle)
• Score: 11.675789515164269
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite widespread adoption, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer performance degradation when encountering unfamiliar queries under distribution shifts. Existing methods to improve MLLM generalization typically require either more instruction data or larger advanced model architectures, both of which incur non-trivial human labor or computational costs. In this work, we take an alternative approach to enhance the generalization and robustness of MLLMs under distribution shifts, from a representation learning perspective. Inspired by information bottleneck (IB) principle, we derive a variational lower bound of the IB for MLLMs and devise a practical implementation, Visual Instruction Bottleneck Tuning (Vittle). We then provide a theoretical justification of Vittle by revealing its connection to an information-theoretic robustness metric of MLLM. Empirical validation of multiple MLLMs on open-ended and closed-form question answering and object hallucination detection tasks over 45 datasets, including 30 shift scenarios, demonstrates that Vittle consistently improves the MLLM's robustness under shifts by pursuing the learning of a minimal sufficient representation.

Related papers

• Generative Giants, Retrieval Weaklings: Why do Multimodal Large Language Models Fail at Multimodal Retrieval? [8.45007357012084]
  We investigate the underlying mechanisms that hinder MLLMs from serving as effective retrievers.<n>Our analysis reveals that the representation space of MLLMs is overwhelmingly dominated by textual semantics.<n>We find that the specific feature components that contribute most to the similarity computations for MLLMs are in fact distractors that actively degrade retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T07:36:20Z)
• WeMMU: Enhanced Bridging of Vision-Language Models and Diffusion Models via Noisy Query Tokens [69.97021957331326]
  We propose Noisy Query Tokens, which learn a distributed representation space between the VLM and Diffusion Model via end-to-end optimization.<n>We also introduce a VAE branch with linear projection to recover fine-grained image details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T09:02:20Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Visual Token Redundancy for Discrete Diffusion-based Multimodal Large Language Models [85.30893355216486]
  We study how visual token redundancy evolves with different dMLLM architectures and tasks.<n>Our study reveals that visual redundancy emerges only in from-scratch dMLLMs while handling long-answer tasks.<n>Layer-skipping is promising for accelerating AR-to-diffusion dMLLMs, whereas progressive or late-step pruning is more effective for from-scratch dMLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T04:13:36Z)
• Unlocking the Forgery Detection Potential of Vanilla MLLMs: A Novel Training-Free Pipeline [5.740204096484276]
  We propose Foresee, a training-free MLLM-based pipeline tailored for image forgery analysis.<n>Foresee employs a type-prior-driven strategy and utilizes a Flexible Feature Detector module to handle copy-move manipulations.<n>Our approach simultaneously achieves superior localization accuracy and provides more comprehensive textual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T14:49:57Z)
• Think Then Embed: Generative Context Improves Multimodal Embedding [51.76690812535934]
  We propose a Think-Then-Embed (TTE) framework for Universal Multimodal Embeddings (UME), composed of a reasoner and an embedder.<n>By leveraging a powerful MLLM reasoner, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on the MMEB-V2 benchmark, surpassing proprietary models trained on massive in-house datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:53:56Z)
• Reasoning-Aligned Perception Decoupling for Scalable Multi-modal Reasoning [95.44766931218896]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) still lag behind text-based reasoning.<n>We introduce Perception-Reasoning Decoupling, which modularizes the MLLM's reasoning component and makes it easily replaceable.<n>We propose a novel reinforcement learning algorithm called Visual Perception Optimization (VPO) to align the MLLM's perceptual output with the final reasoning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T02:28:07Z)
• Textual Steering Vectors Can Improve Visual Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models [42.449334670206824]
  Text-derived steering consistently enhances multimodal accuracy across diverse MLLM architectures and visual tasks.<n>Mean shift boosts spatial relationship accuracy on CV-Bench by up to +7.3% and counting accuracy by up to +3.3%.<n>Results highlight textual steering vectors as a powerful, efficient mechanism for enhancing grounding in MLLMs with minimal additional data collection and computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T08:23:08Z)
• Enhancing LLM Robustness to Perturbed Instructions: An Empirical Study [8.827173113748701]
  We study character- and word-level edits of task-specific instructions, which substantially degrade downstream performance.<n>We find that, on average, self-denoising achieves substantially higher performance gains than alternative strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T16:17:56Z)
• Orchestrate Multimodal Data with Batch Post-Balancing to Accelerate Multimodal Large Language Model Training [12.911726316306755]
  We introduce OrchMLLM, a framework designed to mitigate the inefficiencies in MLLM training caused by Modality Composition Incoherence.<n> Batch Post-Balancing Dispatcher and MLLM Global Orchestrator are used to eliminate mini-batch imbalances in sequential data.<n>OrchMLLM achieves a Model FLOPs Utilization (MFU) of $41.6%$ when training an 84B MLLM with three modalities on $2560$ H100 GPU, outperforming Megatron-LM by up to $3.1times$ in throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T08:24:23Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• LFTR: Learning-Free Token Reduction for Multimodal Large Language Models [3.368594680297987]
  We introduce a learning-free token reduction (LFTR) method designed for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>By capitalizing on the redundancy in visual representations, our approach effectively reduces tokens while preserving the general inference performance of MLLMs.<n>Our results show that LFTR achieves up to a $16times$ reduction of visual tokens while maintaining or even enhancing performance on mainstream vision question-answering benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T02:52:32Z)
• Analyzing Finetuning Representation Shift for Multimodal LLMs Steering [56.710375516257876]
  We propose to map hidden states to interpretable visual and textual concepts.<n>This enables us to more efficiently compare certain semantic dynamics, such as the shift from an original and fine-tuned model.<n>We also demonstrate the use of shift vectors to capture these concepts changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T13:37:13Z)
• AgentPS: Agentic Process Supervision for Content Moderation with Multimodal LLMs [9.35901507816989]
  We introduce AgentPS, a framework that integrates Agentic Process Supervision into large language models.<n>We show that AgentPS achieves substantial improvements over baseline MLLMs on public benchmarks and proprietary datasets.<n>These results establish AgentPS as a scalable and effective solution for complex multimodal classification in large-scale industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T04:58:00Z)
• Accelerating Multimodal Large Language Models via Dynamic Visual-Token Exit and the Empirical Findings [66.04061083611863]
  Excessive use of visual tokens in existing Multimoal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often exhibits obvious redundancy and brings in prohibitively expensive computation.<n>We propose a simple yet effective method to improve the efficiency of MLLMs, termed dynamic visual-token exit (DyVTE)<n>DyVTE uses lightweight hyper-networks to perceive the text token status and decide the removal of all visual tokens after a certain layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T11:24:23Z)
• Learn from Downstream and Be Yourself in Multimodal Large Language Model Fine-Tuning [104.27224674122313]
  Fine-tuning MLLM has become a common practice to improve performance on specific downstream tasks. To balance the trade-off between generalization and specialization, we propose measuring the parameter importance for both pre-trained and fine-tuning distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T01:16:37Z)
• LLaVA-KD: A Framework of Distilling Multimodal Large Language Models [70.19607283302712]
  We propose a novel framework to transfer knowledge from l-MLLM to s-MLLM. Specifically, we introduce Multimodal Distillation (MDist) to minimize the divergence between the visual-textual output distributions of l-MLLM and s-MLLM. We also propose a three-stage training scheme to fully exploit the potential of s-MLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:41:28Z)
• RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks. Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs. In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models [73.86954509967416]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks. This paper presents the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T09:22:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.