Taming Recommendation Bias with Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14310v2
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 10:52:31 GMT
• Title: Taming Recommendation Bias with Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity
• Authors: Shiyin Tan, Dongyuan Li, Renhe Jiang, Zhen Wang, Xingtong Yu, Manabu Okumura,
• Abstract summary: Popularity bias occurs when popular items are recommended far more frequently than they should be.<n>Existing debiasing methods mitigate popularity bias often uniformly across all users.<n>We propose a novel method called CausalEPP (Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity) for taming recommendation bias.
• Score: 21.645389873171908
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Popularity bias occurs when popular items are recommended far more frequently than they should be, negatively impacting both user experience and recommendation accuracy. Existing debiasing methods mitigate popularity bias often uniformly across all users and only partially consider the time evolution of users or items. However, users have different levels of preference for item popularity, and this preference is evolving over time. To address these issues, we propose a novel method called CausalEPP (Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity) for taming recommendation bias, which accounts for the evolving personal popularity of users. Specifically, we first introduce a metric called {Evolving Personal Popularity} to quantify each user's preference for popular items. Then, we design a causal graph that integrates evolving personal popularity into the conformity effect, and apply deconfounded training to mitigate the popularity bias of the causal graph. During inference, we consider the evolution consistency between users and items to achieve a better recommendation. Empirical studies demonstrate that CausalEPP outperforms baseline methods in reducing popularity bias while improving recommendation accuracy.

Related papers

• PBiLoss: Popularity-Aware Regularization to Improve Fairness in Graph-Based Recommender Systems [1.0128808054306186]
  We propose PBiLoss, a regularization-based loss function designed to counteract popularity bias in graph-based recommender models explicitly.<n>We show that PBiLoss significantly improves fairness, as demonstrated by reductions in the Popularity-Rank Correlation for Users (PRU) and Popularity-Rank Correlation for Items (PRI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T08:29:32Z)
• Exploring the Effect of Context-Awareness and Popularity Calibration on Popularity Bias in POI Recommendations [1.389360509566256]
  Point-of-interest (POI) recommender systems help users discover relevant locations, but their effectiveness is often compromised by popularity bias.<n>This paper addresses this challenge by evaluating the effectiveness of context-aware models and calibrated popularity techniques as strategies for mitigating popularity bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T11:56:11Z)
• Enhancing Sequential Music Recommendation with Personalized Popularity Awareness [56.972624411205224]
  This paper introduces a novel approach that incorporates personalized popularity information into sequential recommendation. Experimental results demonstrate that a Personalized Most Popular recommender outperforms existing state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T15:05:12Z)
• A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation [64.44255178199846]
  We study the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations. A big hurdle is the lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. We propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T14:56:56Z)
• Going Beyond Popularity and Positivity Bias: Correcting for Multifactorial Bias in Recommender Systems [74.47680026838128]
  Two typical forms of bias in user interaction data with recommender systems (RSs) are popularity bias and positivity bias. We consider multifactorial selection bias affected by both item and rating value factors. We propose smoothing and alternating gradient descent techniques to reduce variance and improve the robustness of its optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:18:21Z)
• Test Time Embedding Normalization for Popularity Bias Mitigation [6.145760252113906]
  Popularity bias is a widespread problem in the field of recommender systems. We propose 'Test Time Embedding Normalization' as a simple yet effective strategy for mitigating popularity bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T08:57:44Z)
• Ranking with Popularity Bias: User Welfare under Self-Amplification Dynamics [19.59766711993837]
  We propose and theoretically analyze a general mechanism by which item popularity, item quality, and position bias jointly impact user choice. We show that naive popularity-biased recommenders induce linear regret by conflating item quality and popularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T22:38:19Z)
• Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
  Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training. A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data. We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z)
• Reconciling the Quality vs Popularity Dichotomy in Online Cultural Markets [62.146882023375746]
  We propose a model of an idealized online cultural market in which $N$ items, endowed with a hidden quality metric, are recommended to users by a ranking algorithm possibly biased by the current items' popularity. Our goal is to better understand the underlying mechanisms of the well-known fact that popularity bias can prevent higher-quality items from becoming more popular than lower-quality items, producing an undesirable misalignment between quality and popularity rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T14:36:11Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendation [0.0]
  Popularity bias refers to the problem that popular items are recommended frequently while less popular items are recommended rarely or not at all. We analyze the well-known Book-Crossing dataset and define three user groups based on their tendency towards popular items. Our results indicate that most state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms suffer from popularity bias in the book domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T20:21:46Z)
• User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [4.30484058393522]
  Recommendation and ranking systems suffer from popularity bias; the tendency of the algorithm to favor a few popular items while under-representing the majority of other items. In this paper, we show the limitations of the existing metrics to evaluate popularity bias mitigation when we want to assess these algorithms from the users' perspective. We present an effective approach that mitigates popularity bias from the user-centered point of view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T22:12:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.