Can Large Language Models Really Recognize Your Name?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14549v1
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:05:05 GMT
• Title: Can Large Language Models Really Recognize Your Name?
• Authors: Dzung Pham, Peter Kairouz, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Eugene Bagdasarian, Chau Minh Pham, Amir Houmansadr,
• Abstract summary: We show that modern large language models (LLMs) regularly overlook human names even in short text snippets due to ambiguous contexts.<n>We propose AMBENCH, a benchmark dataset of seemingly ambiguous human names.
• Score: 23.4365383606717
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to protect sensitive user data. However, current LLM-based privacy solutions assume that these models can reliably detect personally identifiable information (PII), particularly named entities. In this paper, we challenge that assumption by revealing systematic failures in LLM-based privacy tasks. Specifically, we show that modern LLMs regularly overlook human names even in short text snippets due to ambiguous contexts, which cause the names to be misinterpreted or mishandled. We propose AMBENCH, a benchmark dataset of seemingly ambiguous human names, leveraging the name regularity bias phenomenon, embedded within concise text snippets along with benign prompt injections. Our experiments on modern LLMs tasked to detect PII as well as specialized tools show that recall of ambiguous names drops by 20--40% compared to more recognizable names. Furthermore, ambiguous human names are four times more likely to be ignored in supposedly privacy-preserving summaries generated by LLMs when benign prompt injections are present. These findings highlight the underexplored risks of relying solely on LLMs to safeguard user privacy and underscore the need for a more systematic investigation into their privacy failure modes.

Related papers

• Self-Refining Language Model Anonymizers via Adversarial Distillation [49.17383264812234]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in sensitive domains, where their ability to infer personal data poses emerging privacy risks.<n>We introduce SElf-refining Anonymization with Language model (SEAL), a novel distillation framework for training small language models (SLMs) to perform effective anonymization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T08:21:27Z)
• Anti-adversarial Learning: Desensitizing Prompts for Large Language Models [13.674984661911607]
  We propose PromptObfus, a novel method for desensitizing LLM prompts.<n>The core idea of PromptObfus is "anti-adversarial" learning, which perturbs privacy words in the prompt to obscure sensitive information.<n>We show that PromptObfus effectively prevents privacy inference from remote LLMs while preserving task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T06:19:02Z)
• Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models [52.439289085318634]
  We show how to identify training data known to proprietary large language models (LLMs) by using information-guided probes.<n>Our work builds on a key observation: text passages with high surprisal are good search material for memorization probes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T10:19:15Z)
• WHODUNIT: Evaluation benchmark for culprit detection in mystery stories [3.42528786340268]
  We present a novel data set, WhoDunIt, to assess the deductive reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLM)<n>The dataset challenges LLMs to identify the perpetrator after reading and comprehending the story.<n>We apply a range of character-level name augmentations, including original names, name swaps, and substitutions with well-known real and/or fictional entities from popular discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T18:14:44Z)
• Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasures [63.91918057570824]
  Large language model (LLM) based personal information extraction can be benchmarked.<n>LLM can be misused by attackers to accurately extract various personal information from personal profiles.<n> prompt injection can defend against strong LLM-based attacks, reducing the attack to less effective traditional ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T04:49:30Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Anonymizing text that contains sensitive information is crucial for a wide range of applications.<n>Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of the re-identification ability of large language models.<n>We propose a framework composed of three key components: a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• Large Language Models as Carriers of Hidden Messages [0.0]
  Simple fine-tuning can embed hidden text into large language models (LLMs), which is revealed only when triggered by a specific query.<n>Our work demonstrates that embedding hidden text via fine-tuning, although seemingly secure due to the vast number of potential triggers, is vulnerable to extraction.<n>We introduce an extraction attack called Unconditional Token Forcing (UTF), which iteratively feeds tokens from the LLM's vocabulary to reveal sequences with high token probabilities, indicating hidden text candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T16:49:06Z)
• Get my drift? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activation Deltas [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users.<n>We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set.<n>We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity [22.078095273053506]
  We propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns language models to deal with ambiguous queries. Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries. Our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:59:53Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.