Lawful but Awful: Evolving Legislative Responses to Address Online Misinformation, Disinformation, and Mal-Information in the Age of Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15067v1
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 03:33:13 GMT
• Title: Lawful but Awful: Evolving Legislative Responses to Address Online Misinformation, Disinformation, and Mal-Information in the Age of Generative AI
• Authors: Simon Chesterman,
• Abstract summary: This article analyses changing perceptions about the potential harms caused by misinformation, disinformation, and "mal-information"<n>The turn to legislation began in countries that were less free, in terms of civil liberties, and poorer, as measured by GDP per capita.<n>Despite early reservations, growth in such laws is now steepest in Western states.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: "Fake news" is an old problem. In recent years, however, increasing usage of social media as a source of information, the spread of unverified medical advice during the Covid-19 pandemic, and the rise of generative artificial intelligence have seen a rush of legislative proposals seeking to minimize or mitigate the impact of false information spread online. Drawing on a novel dataset of statutes and other instruments, this article analyses changing perceptions about the potential harms caused by misinformation, disinformation, and "mal-information". The turn to legislation began in countries that were less free, in terms of civil liberties, and poorer, as measured by GDP per capita. Internet penetration does not seem to have been a driving factor. The focus of such laws is most frequently on national security broadly construed, though 2020 saw a spike in laws addressing public health. Unsurprisingly, governments with fewer legal constraints on government action have generally adopted more robust positions in dealing with false information. Despite early reservations, however, growth in such laws is now steepest in Western states. Though there are diverse views on the appropriate response to false information online, the need for legislation of some kind appears now to be global. The question is no longer whether to regulate "lawful but awful" speech online, but how.

Related papers

• Characteristics of Political Misinformation Over the Past Decade [0.0]
  This paper uses natural language processing to find common characteristics of political misinformation over a twelve year period.<n>The results show that misinformation has increased dramatically in recent years and that it has increasingly started to be shared from sources with primary information modalities of text and images.<n>It was discovered that statements expressing misinformation contain more negative sentiment than accurate information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T09:12:39Z)
• Misinformation with Legal Consequences (MisLC): A New Task Towards Harnessing Societal Harm of Misinformation [24.936670177298584]
  We take a novel angle to consolidate the definition of misinformation detection using legal issues as a measurement of societal ramifications. We introduce a new task: Misinformation with Legal Consequence (MisLC), which leverages definitions from a wide range of legal domains. We advocate a two-step dataset curation approach that utilizes crowd-sourced checkworthiness and expert evaluations of misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:00:28Z)
• Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons [74.68176012363253]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data. We conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T16:50:18Z)
• Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset [46.156169284961045]
  We offer an approach to filtering grounded in law, which has directly addressed the tradeoffs in filtering material. First, we gather and make available the Pile of Law, a 256GB dataset of open-source English-language legal and administrative data. Second, we distill the legal norms that governments have developed to constrain the inclusion of toxic or private content into actionable lessons. Third, we show how the Pile of Law offers researchers the opportunity to learn such filtering rules directly from the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T06:25:15Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Domain-Level Detection and Disruption of Disinformation [17.21936233574088]
  We are awash in disinformation consisting of lies, conspiracies, and general nonsense. Although the internet is vast, the peddlers of disinformation appear to be more localized. We propose that search engines and social-media recommendation algorithms can systematically discover and demote the worst disinformation offenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T16:19:08Z)
• SOK: Fake News Outbreak 2021: Can We Stop the Viral Spread? [5.64512235559998]
  Social Networks' omnipresence and ease of use has revolutionized the generation and distribution of information in today's world. Unlike traditional media channels, social networks facilitate faster and wider spread of disinformation and misinformation. Viral spread of false information has serious implications on the behaviors, attitudes and beliefs of the public.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-22T09:26:13Z)
• Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
  We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation. We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines. Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z)
• An Agenda for Disinformation Research [3.083055913556838]
  Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy. The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States. New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T19:32:36Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.