Extracting Probabilistic Knowledge from Large Language Models for Bayesian Network Parameterization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15918v1
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 18:15:05 GMT
• Title: Extracting Probabilistic Knowledge from Large Language Models for Bayesian Network Parameterization
• Authors: Aliakbar Nafar, Kristen Brent Venable, Zijun Cui, Parisa Kordjamshidi,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential as factual knowledge bases.<n>This paper investigates using probabilistic knowledge in LLMs to derive probability estimates for statements concerning events.
• Score: 22.286144400569007
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential as factual knowledge bases; however, their capability to generate probabilistic knowledge about real-world events remains understudied. This paper investigates using probabilistic knowledge inherent in LLMs to derive probability estimates for statements concerning events and their interrelationships captured via a Bayesian Network (BN). Using LLMs in this context allows for the parameterization of BNs, enabling probabilistic modeling within specific domains. Experiments on eighty publicly available Bayesian Networks, from healthcare to finance, demonstrate that querying LLMs about the conditional probabilities of events provides meaningful results when compared to baselines, including random and uniform distributions, as well as approaches based on next-token generation probabilities. We explore how these LLM-derived distributions can serve as expert priors to refine distributions extracted from minimal data, significantly reducing systematic biases. Overall, this work introduces a promising strategy for automatically constructing Bayesian Networks by combining probabilistic knowledge extracted from LLMs with small amounts of real-world data. Additionally, we evaluate several prompting strategies for eliciting probabilistic knowledge from LLMs and establish the first comprehensive baseline for assessing LLM performance in extracting probabilistic knowledge.

Related papers

• Exploring the Potential for Large Language Models to Demonstrate Rational Probabilistic Beliefs [12.489784979345654]
  We show that current versions of large language models (LLMs) lack the ability to provide rational and coherent representations of probabilistic beliefs.<n>We apply well-established techniques for uncertainty quantification to measure the ability of LLM's to adhere to fundamental properties of probabilistic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T11:50:30Z)
• Bayesian Teaching Enables Probabilistic Reasoning in Large Language Models [50.16340812031201]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) do not update their beliefs as expected from the Bayesian framework.<n>We teach the LLMs to reason in a Bayesian manner by training them to mimic the predictions of an optimal Bayesian model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T20:13:04Z)
• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context.<n>We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters.<n>We propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• Amortized Bayesian Multilevel Models [9.831471158899644]
  Multilevel models (MLMs) are a central building block of the Bayesian workflow.<n>MLMs pose significant computational challenges, often rendering their estimation and evaluation intractable within reasonable time constraints.<n>Recent advances in simulation-based inference offer promising solutions for addressing complex probabilistic models using deep generative networks.<n>We explore a family of neural network architectures that leverage the probabilistic factorization of multilevel models to facilitate efficient neural network training and subsequent near-instant posterior inference on unseen datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T17:11:04Z)
• LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language [35.84181171987974]
  Our goal is to build a regression model that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions at arbitrary locations.<n>We start by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from Large Language Models.<n>We demonstrate the ability to usefully incorporate text into numerical predictions, improving predictive performance and giving quantitative structure that reflects qualitative descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T15:13:12Z)
• BIRD: A Trustworthy Bayesian Inference Framework for Large Language Models [52.46248487458641]
  Predictive models often need to work with incomplete information in real-world tasks.<n>Current large language models (LLMs) are insufficient for accurate estimations.<n>We propose BIRD, a novel probabilistic inference framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T20:17:23Z)
• Do LLMs Play Dice? Exploring Probability Distribution Sampling in Large Language Models for Behavioral Simulation [73.58618024960968]
  An increasing number of studies are employing large language models (LLMs) as agents to emulate the sequential decision-making processes of humans.<n>This arouses curiosity regarding the capacity of LLM agents to comprehend probability distributions.<n>Our analysis indicates that LLM agents can understand probabilities, but they struggle with probability sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T16:59:28Z)
• Beyond Probabilities: Unveiling the Misalignment in Evaluating Large Language Models [24.445829787297658]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various applications. This study aims to scrutinize the validity of such probability-based evaluation methods within the context of using LLMs for Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) Our empirical investigation reveals that the prevalent probability-based evaluation method inadequately aligns with generation-based prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T15:58:37Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.