Fairness under Competition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16291v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 06:43:15 GMT
• Title: Fairness under Competition
• Authors: Ronen Gradwohl, Eilam Shapira, Moshe Tennenholtz,
• Abstract summary: We consider the effects of adopting fair classifiers on the overall level of ecosystem fairness.<n>We show that even if competing classifiers are individually fair, the ecosystem's outcome may be unfair.
• Score: 10.003345361182628
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Algorithmic fairness has emerged as a central issue in ML, and it has become standard practice to adjust ML algorithms so that they will satisfy fairness requirements such as Equal Opportunity. In this paper we consider the effects of adopting such fair classifiers on the overall level of ecosystem fairness. Specifically, we introduce the study of fairness with competing firms, and demonstrate the failure of fair classifiers in yielding fair ecosystems. Our results quantify the loss of fairness in systems, under a variety of conditions, based on classifiers' correlation and the level of their data overlap. We show that even if competing classifiers are individually fair, the ecosystem's outcome may be unfair; and that adjusting biased algorithms to improve their individual fairness may lead to an overall decline in ecosystem fairness. In addition to these theoretical results, we also provide supporting experimental evidence. Together, our model and results provide a novel and essential call for action.

Related papers

• FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated Learning [13.575259448363557]
  We propose a controllable group-fairness calibration framework, named FedFACT.<n>FedFACT identifies the Bayes-optimal classifiers under both global and local fairness constraints.<n>Experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that FedFACT consistently outperforms baselines in balancing accuracy and global-local fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T09:39:57Z)
• Towards Fair RAG: On the Impact of Fair Ranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [53.285436927963865]
  This paper is the first systematic evaluation of RAG systems that integrate fairness-aware rankings.<n>We show that incorporating fairness-aware retrieval often maintains or even enhances both ranking quality and generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T23:10:04Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Bias [42.43344286660331]
  We study the effect of varying data biases on the accuracy and fairness of fair classifiers. Our experiments show how to integrate a measure of data bias risk in the existing fairness dashboards for real-world deployments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T13:04:46Z)
• FaiREE: Fair Classification with Finite-Sample and Distribution-Free Guarantee [35.68504233140245]
  FaiREE is a fair classification algorithm that can satisfy group fairness constraints with finite-sample and distribution-free theoretical guarantees.<n>FaiREE is shown to have favorable performance over state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T05:16:20Z)
• Equal Improvability: A New Fairness Notion Considering the Long-term Impact [27.72859815965265]
  We propose a new fairness notion called Equal Improvability (EI) EI equalizes the potential acceptance rate of the rejected samples across different groups. We show that proposed EI-regularized algorithms encourage us to find a fair classifier in terms of EI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T04:59:28Z)
• Measuring Fairness of Text Classifiers via Prediction Sensitivity [63.56554964580627]
  ACCUMULATED PREDICTION SENSITIVITY measures fairness in machine learning models based on the model's prediction sensitivity to perturbations in input features. We show that the metric can be theoretically linked with a specific notion of group fairness (statistical parity) and individual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T15:00:33Z)
• A Fair Empirical Risk Minimization with Generalized Entropy [4.535780433771325]
  We consider a fair empirical risk minimization with a fairness constraint specified by generalized entropy. We theoretically investigate if the fair empirical fair classification problem is learnable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T09:11:45Z)
• Normalise for Fairness: A Simple Normalisation Technique for Fairness in Regression Machine Learning Problems [46.93320580613236]
  We present a simple, yet effective method based on normalisation (FaiReg) for regression problems. We compare it with two standard methods for fairness, namely data balancing and adversarial training. The results show the superior performance of diminishing the effects of unfairness better than data balancing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T12:26:25Z)
• Unfairness Despite Awareness: Group-Fair Classification with Strategic Agents [37.31138342300617]
  We show that strategic agents may possess both the ability and the incentive to manipulate an observed feature vector in order to attain a more favorable outcome. We further demonstrate that both the increased selectiveness of the fair classifier, and consequently the loss of fairness, arises when performing fair learning on domains in which the advantaged group is overrepresented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T02:42:43Z)
• MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
  We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair) We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it. Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z)
• Beyond Individual and Group Fairness [90.4666341812857]
  We present a new data-driven model of fairness that is guided by the unfairness complaints received by the system. Our model supports multiple fairness criteria and takes into account their potential incompatibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T14:14:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.