MPO: Multilingual Safety Alignment via Reward Gap Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16869v1
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 16:24:51 GMT
- Title: MPO: Multilingual Safety Alignment via Reward Gap Optimization
- Authors: Weixiang Zhao, Yulin Hu, Yang Deng, Tongtong Wu, Wenxuan Zhang, Jiahe Guo, An Zhang, Yanyan Zhao, Bing Qin, Tat-Seng Chua, Ting Liu,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly central to AI applications worldwide.<n>Existing preference learning methods for safety alignment, such as RLHF and DPO, are primarily monolingual and struggle with noisy multilingual data.<n>We introduce Multilingual reward gaP Optimization (MPO), a novel approach that leverages the well-aligned safety capabilities of the dominant language (English) to improve safety alignment across multiple languages.
- Score: 88.76638442683391
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly central to AI applications worldwide, necessitating robust multilingual safety alignment to ensure secure deployment across diverse linguistic contexts. Existing preference learning methods for safety alignment, such as RLHF and DPO, are primarily monolingual and struggle with noisy multilingual data. To address these limitations, we introduce Multilingual reward gaP Optimization (MPO), a novel approach that leverages the well-aligned safety capabilities of the dominant language (English) to improve safety alignment across multiple languages. MPO directly minimizes the reward gap difference between the dominant language and target languages, effectively transferring safety capabilities while preserving the original strengths of the dominant language. Extensive experiments on three LLMs, LLaMA-3.1, Gemma-2 and Qwen2.5, validate MPO's efficacy in multilingual safety alignment without degrading general multilingual utility.
Related papers
- Multilingual Collaborative Defense for Large Language Models [33.14454771097587]
One notable vulnerability is the ability to bypass safeguards by translating harmful queries into rare or underrepresented languages.<n>Despite the growing concern, there has been limited research addressing the safeguarding of LLMs in multilingual scenarios.<n>We propose Multilingual Collaborative Defense (MCD), a novel learning method that optimize a continuous, soft safety prompt automatically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T04:47:16Z) - MrGuard: A Multilingual Reasoning Guardrail for Universal LLM Safety [56.79292318645454]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to adversarial attacks such as jailbreaking.<n>This vulnerability is exacerbated in multilingual settings, where multilingual safety-aligned data is often limited.<n>We introduce a multilingual guardrail with reasoning for prompt classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T17:15:06Z) - X-Guard: Multilingual Guard Agent for Content Moderation [8.233872344445675]
X-Guard is a transparent multilingual safety agent designed to provide content moderation across diverse linguistic contexts.<n>Our approach includes curating and enhancing multiple open-source safety datasets with explicit evaluation rationales.<n>Our empirical evaluations demonstrate X-Guard's effectiveness in detecting unsafe content across multiple languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T01:58:06Z) - LLMs Lost in Translation: M-ALERT uncovers Cross-Linguistic Safety Inconsistencies [63.10843814055688]
M-ALERT is a benchmark that evaluates the safety of Large Language Models in five languages.<n>M-ALERT includes 15k high-quality prompts per language, totaling 75k, with category-wise annotations.<n>Our experiments on 39 state-of-the-art LLMs highlight the importance of language-specific safety analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T16:46:54Z) - Lens: Rethinking Multilingual Enhancement for Large Language Models [70.85065197789639]
Lens is a novel approach to enhance multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
It operates by manipulating the hidden representations within the language-agnostic and language-specific subspaces from top layers of LLMs.
It achieves superior results with much fewer computational resources compared to existing post-training approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T08:51:30Z) - Multilingual Blending: LLM Safety Alignment Evaluation with Language Mixture [6.17896401271963]
We introduce Multilingual Blending, a mixed-language query-response scheme designed to evaluate the safety alignment of various large language models.
We investigate language patterns such as language availability, morphology, and language family that could impact the effectiveness of Multilingual Blending.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T03:26:15Z) - Safe Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Natural Language Constraints [49.01100552946231]
The role of natural language constraints in Safe Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is crucial, yet often overlooked.
We propose a novel approach named Safe Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Natural Language constraints (SMALL)
Our method leverages fine-tuned language models to interpret and process free-form textual constraints, converting them into semantic embeddings.
These embeddings are then integrated into the multi-agent policy learning process, enabling agents to learn policies that minimize constraint violations while optimizing rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T12:57:35Z) - All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models [96.47607891042523]
We build the first multilingual safety benchmark for large language models (LLMs)
XSafety covers 14 kinds of commonly used safety issues across 10 languages that span several language families.
We propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T05:23:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.