ICYM2I: The illusion of multimodal informativeness under missingness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16953v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:34:38 GMT
• Title: ICYM2I: The illusion of multimodal informativeness under missingness
• Abstract summary: We introduce ICYM2I, a framework for the evaluation of predictive performance and information gain under missingness.<n>We demonstrate the importance of the proposed adjustment to estimate information gain under missingness on synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world medical datasets.
• Score: 3.975003897287838
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal learning is of continued interest in artificial intelligence-based applications, motivated by the potential information gain from combining different types of data. However, modalities collected and curated during development may differ from the modalities available at deployment due to multiple factors including cost, hardware failure, or -- as we argue in this work -- the perceived informativeness of a given modality. Na{\"i}ve estimation of the information gain associated with including an additional modality without accounting for missingness may result in improper estimates of that modality's value in downstream tasks. Our work formalizes the problem of missingness in multimodal learning and demonstrates the biases resulting from ignoring this process. To address this issue, we introduce ICYM2I (In Case You Multimodal Missed It), a framework for the evaluation of predictive performance and information gain under missingness through inverse probability weighting-based correction. We demonstrate the importance of the proposed adjustment to estimate information gain under missingness on synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world medical datasets.

Related papers

• Delving Aleatoric Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation via Vision Foundation Models [56.29123284262618]
  This work proposes leveraging the universal representation capabilities of visual foundation models to estimate inherent data uncertainty.<n>We analyze the feature diversity of the model's decoded representations and quantify their singular value energy to define the semantic perception scale for each class.<n>Based on this foundation, we design two uncertainty-driven application strategies: (1) the aleatoric uncertainty-aware data filtering mechanism to eliminate potentially noisy samples and enhance model learning quality; and (2) the dynamic uncertainty-aware optimization strategy that adaptively adjusts class-specific loss weights during training based on the semantic perception scale, combined with a label denoising mechanism to improve training stability
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T03:59:54Z)
• When Active Learning Fails, Uncalibrated Out of Distribution Uncertainty Quantification Might Be the Problem [2.3348738689737503]
  Uncertainty estimation and calibration methods are evaluated for active learning campaigns in materials discovery.<n>Uncertainty calibration methods were found to variably generalize from in-domain data to out-of-domain data.<n>The impact of poor-quality uncertainty persists for random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting models trained on the same data for the same tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T20:17:46Z)
• The Multimodal Paradox: How Added and Missing Modalities Shape Bias and Performance in Multimodal AI [0.0]
  Multimodal learning has proven superior to unimodal counterparts in high-stakes decision-making.<n>While performance gains remain the gold standard for evaluating multimodal systems, concerns around bias and robustness are frequently overlooked.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T20:42:44Z)
• Are you SURE? Enhancing Multimodal Pretraining with Missing Modalities through Uncertainty Estimation [12.459901557580052]
  We present SURE, a novel framework that extends the capabilities of pretrained multimodal models by introducing latent space reconstruction and uncertainty estimation.<n>We show that SURE consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, ensuring robust predictions even in the presence of incomplete data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T05:07:20Z)
• Reducing Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty through Multi-modal Data Acquisition [5.468547489755107]
  This paper introduces an innovative data acquisition framework where uncertainty disentanglement leads to actionable decisions.<n>The main hypothesis is that aleatoric uncertainty decreases as the number of modalities increases.<n>We provide proof-of-concept implementations on two multi-modal datasets to showcase our data acquisition framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T11:05:59Z)
• Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models [12.841405829775852]
  We introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify bias inVidQA benchmarks and datasets.<n>We also propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance.<n>Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T23:32:42Z)
• Borrowing Treasures from Neighbors: In-Context Learning for Multimodal Learning with Missing Modalities and Data Scarcity [9.811378971225727]
  This paper extends the current research into missing modalities to the low-data regime. It is often expensive to get full-modality data and sufficient annotated training samples. We propose to use retrieval-augmented in-context learning to address these two crucial issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T14:19:48Z)
• Exploring Missing Modality in Multimodal Egocentric Datasets [89.76463983679058]
  We introduce a novel concept -Missing Modality Token (MMT)-to maintain performance even when modalities are absent. Our method mitigates the performance loss, reducing it from its original $sim 30%$ drop to only $sim 10%$ when half of the test set is modal-incomplete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T11:55:42Z)
• Learning Unseen Modality Interaction [54.23533023883659]
  Multimodal learning assumes all modality combinations of interest are available during training to learn cross-modal correspondences. We pose the problem of unseen modality interaction and introduce a first solution. It exploits a module that projects the multidimensional features of different modalities into a common space with rich information preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T10:53:10Z)
• Correlation Information Bottleneck: Towards Adapting Pretrained Multimodal Models for Robust Visual Question Answering [63.87200781247364]
  Correlation Information Bottleneck (CIB) seeks a tradeoff between compression and redundancy in representations. We derive a tight theoretical upper bound for the mutual information between multimodal inputs and representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T22:04:10Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Bi-Bimodal Modality Fusion for Correlation-Controlled Multimodal Sentiment Analysis [96.46952672172021]
  Bi-Bimodal Fusion Network (BBFN) is a novel end-to-end network that performs fusion on pairwise modality representations. Model takes two bimodal pairs as input due to known information imbalance among modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T23:33:42Z)
• BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion [52.184885680729224]
  We study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. We introduce a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:14:18Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalization [107.0464488046289]
  This paper investigates the problem of learning robust, generalizable prediction models from a combination of datasets. Part of the challenge of learning robust models lies in the influence of unobserved confounders. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T08:18:06Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.