Evaluating the Performance of Nigerian Lecturers using Multilayer Perceptron

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17143v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 07:23:14 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Performance of Nigerian Lecturers using Multilayer Perceptron
• Authors: I. E. Ezeibe, S. O. Okide, D. C. Asogwa,
• Abstract summary: The system was designed using a web-based platform, created a secure database, and by using a custom dataset.<n>The model's performance was evaluated using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE)<n>The model also demonstrated an estimated accuracy rate of approximately 96%, validated its effectiveness in predicting lecturer performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating the performance of a lecturer has been essential for enhancing teaching quality, improving student learning outcomes, and strengthening the institution's reputation. The absence of such a system brings about lecturer performance evaluation which was neither comprehensive nor holistic. This system was designed using a web-based platform, created a secure database, and by using a custom dataset, captured some performance metrics which included student evaluation scores, Research Publications, Years of Experience, and Administrative Duties. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithm was utilized due to its ability to process complex data patterns and generates accurate predictions in a lecturer's performance based on historical data. This research focused on designing multiple performance metrics beyond the standard ones, incorporating student participation, and integrating analytical tools to deliver a comprehensive and holistic evaluation of lecturers' performance and was developed using Object-Oriented Analysis and Design (OOAD) methodology. Lecturers' performance is evaluated by the model, and the evaluation accuracy is about 91% compared with actual performance. Finally, by evaluating the performance of the MLP model, it is concluded that MLP enhanced lecturer performance evaluation by providing accurate predictions, reducing bias, and supporting data-driven decisions, ultimately improving the fairness and efficiency of the evaluation process. The MLP model's performance was evaluated using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), achieved a test loss (MSE) of 256.99 and a MAE of 13.76, and reflected a high level of prediction accuracy. The model also demonstrated an estimated accuracy rate of approximately 96%, validated its effectiveness in predicting lecturer performance.

Related papers

• Explainable AI and Machine Learning for Exam-based Student Evaluation: Causal and Predictive Analysis of Socio-academic and Economic Factors [1.2163458046014015]
  Academic performance depends on a multivariable nexus of socio-academic and financial factors.<n>This study investigates these influences to develop effective strategies for optimizing students' CGPA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T17:09:49Z)
• Evaluation of Machine Learning Models in Student Academic Performance Prediction [0.0]
  This research investigates the use of machine learning methods to forecast students' academic performance in a school setting.<n>Students' data with behavioral, academic, and demographic details were used in implementations with standard classical machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T13:33:49Z)
• FORLAPS: An Innovative Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning Approach for Prescriptive Process Monitoring [3.4437362489150254]
  This study introduces an innovative evaluation model, benchmarking its performance against earlier works using nine publicly available datasets.<n>The proposed model, FORLAPS, demonstrated exceptional performance, outperforming existing state-of-the-art approaches in suggesting the most optimal policies or predicting the best next activities within a process trace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T20:31:35Z)
• The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning [62.165534879284735]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) aim to identify and mitigate intermediate errors in the reasoning processes.<n>We develop a consensus filtering mechanism that effectively integrates Monte Carlo (MC) estimation with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We release a new state-of-the-art PRM that outperforms existing open-source alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T13:10:16Z)
• Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
  We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations. Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations. We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z)
• Self-Taught Evaluators [77.92610887220594]
  We present an approach that aims to im-proves without human annotations, using synthetic training data only. Our Self-Taught Evaluator can improve a strong LLM from 75.4 to 88.3 on RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T17:57:02Z)
• A Framework for Efficient Model Evaluation through Stratification, Sampling, and Estimation [17.351089059392674]
  We propose a framework for model evaluation that includes stratification, sampling, and estimation components. We show that stratification via k-means clustering based on accurate predictions of model performance yields efficient estimators. We also find that model-assisted estimators, which leverage predictions of model accuracy on the unlabeled portion of the dataset, are generally more efficient than the traditional estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:49:04Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracy [50.09931172314218]
  We introduce ReasonEval, a new methodology for evaluating the quality of reasoning steps.<n>We show that ReasonEval consistently outperforms baseline methods in the meta-evaluation datasets.<n>We observe that ReasonEval can play a significant role in data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T17:18:04Z)
• Weak Supervision Performance Evaluation via Partial Identification [46.73061437177238]
  Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) enables supervised model training without direct access to ground truth labels. We present a novel method to address this challenge by framing model evaluation as a partial identification problem. Our approach derives reliable bounds on key metrics without requiring labeled data, overcoming core limitations in current weak supervision evaluation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T07:15:11Z)
• Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater [142.24553056600627]
  Large language models(LLMs) have greatly advanced the frontiers of artificial intelligence, attaining remarkable improvement in model capacity. To assess the model performance, a typical approach is to construct evaluation benchmarks for measuring the ability level of LLMs. We discuss the potential risk and impact of inappropriately using evaluation benchmarks and misleadingly interpreting the evaluation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:59:54Z)
• Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans [65.36614996495983]
  We argue that psychometrics, a theory originating in the 20th century for human assessment, could be a powerful solution to the challenges in today's AI evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark [53.663757126289795]
  This paper introduces GAOKAO-Bench, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples. With human evaluation, we obtain the converted total score of LLMs, including GPT-4, ChatGPT and ERNIE-Bot. We also use LLMs to grade the subjective questions, and find that model scores achieve a moderate level of consistency with human scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T14:39:28Z)
• FORML: Learning to Reweight Data for Fairness [2.105564340986074]
  We introduce Fairness Optimized Reweighting via Meta-Learning (FORML) FORML balances fairness constraints and accuracy by jointly optimizing training sample weights and a neural network's parameters. We show that FORML improves equality of opportunity fairness criteria over existing state-of-the-art reweighting methods by approximately 1% on image classification tasks and by approximately 5% on a face prediction task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:36:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.