Content Moderation in TV Search: Balancing Policy Compliance, Relevance, and User Experience

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17207v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 18:32:39 GMT
• Title: Content Moderation in TV Search: Balancing Policy Compliance, Relevance, and User Experience
• Authors: Adeep Hande, Kishorekumar Sundararajan, Sardar Hamidian, Ferhan Ture,
• Abstract summary: We introduce an additional monitoring layer using Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance content moderation.<n>This additional layer flags content if the user did not intend to search for it.<n>This approach serves as a baseline for product quality assurance, with collected feedback used to refine the initial retrieval mechanisms.
• Score: 2.0201819034973933
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Millions of people rely on search functionality to find and explore content on entertainment platforms. Modern search systems use a combination of candidate generation and ranking approaches, with advanced methods leveraging deep learning and LLM-based techniques to retrieve, generate, and categorize search results. Despite these advancements, search algorithms can still surface inappropriate or irrelevant content due to factors like model unpredictability, metadata errors, or overlooked design flaws. Such issues can misalign with product goals and user expectations, potentially harming user trust and business outcomes. In this work, we introduce an additional monitoring layer using Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance content moderation. This additional layer flags content if the user did not intend to search for it. This approach serves as a baseline for product quality assurance, with collected feedback used to refine the initial retrieval mechanisms of the search model, ensuring a safer and more reliable user experience.

Related papers

• NExT-Search: Rebuilding User Feedback Ecosystem for Generative AI Search [108.42163676745085]
  We envision NExT-Search, a next-generation paradigm designed to reintroduce fine-grained, process-level feedback into generative AI search.<n> NExT-Search integrates two complementary modes: User Debug Mode, which allows engaged users to intervene at key stages; and Shadow User Mode, where a personalized user agent simulates user preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T17:59:13Z)
• Qilin: A Multimodal Information Retrieval Dataset with APP-level User Sessions [39.2477761959206]
  The challenge of improving user experiences in complex systems with search and recommendation (S&R) has drawn significant attention from both academia and industry.<n>We present a novel multimodal information retrieval dataset in this paper, namely Qilin.<n>The dataset is collected from Xiaohongshu, a popular social platform with over 300 million monthly active users and an average search penetration rate of over 70%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T14:15:00Z)
• Towards Boosting LLMs-driven Relevance Modeling with Progressive Retrieved Behavior-augmented Prompting [23.61061000692023]
  This study proposes leveraging user interactions recorded in search logs to yield insights into users' implicit search intentions.<n>We propose ProRBP, a novel Progressive Retrieved Behavior-augmented Prompting framework for integrating search scenario-oriented knowledge with Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T11:07:38Z)
• Meta-prompting Optimized Retrieval-augmented Generation [1.3996171129586734]
  Retrieval-augmented generation resorts to content retrieved from external sources in order to leverage the performance of large language models in downstream tasks. We propose a method to refine the retrieved content before it is included in the prompt by resorting to meta-prompting optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:20:12Z)
• A Survey of Generative Search and Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [125.26354486027408]
  generative search (retrieval) and recommendation aims to address the matching problem in a generative manner. Superintelligent generative large language models have sparked a new paradigm in search and recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:58:17Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
  Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online. But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z)
• Large Search Model: Redefining Search Stack in the Era of LLMs [63.503320030117145]
  We introduce a novel conceptual framework called large search model, which redefines the conventional search stack by unifying search tasks with one large language model (LLM) All tasks are formulated as autoregressive text generation problems, allowing for the customization of tasks through the use of natural language prompts. This proposed framework capitalizes on the strong language understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs, offering the potential to enhance search result quality while simultaneously simplifying the existing cumbersome search stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T05:52:09Z)
• User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
  We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search. We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results. More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.