Single-agent or Multi-agent Systems? Why Not Both?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18286v1
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 18:30:24 GMT
• Title: Single-agent or Multi-agent Systems? Why Not Both?
• Abstract summary: Multi-agent systems (MAS) decompose complex tasks and delegate subtasks to different large language model (LLM) agents and tools.<n>We conduct an empirical study comparing MAS and single-agent systems (SAS) across various popular agentic applications.<n>Our design improves accuracy by 1.1-12% while reducing deployment costs by up to 20% across various agentic applications.
• Score: 2.7635437118448554
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) decompose complex tasks and delegate subtasks to different large language model (LLM) agents and tools. Prior studies have reported the superior accuracy performance of MAS across diverse domains, enabled by long-horizon context tracking and error correction through role-specific agents. However, the design and deployment of MAS incur higher complexity and runtime cost compared to single-agent systems (SAS). Meanwhile, frontier LLMs, such as OpenAI-o3 and Gemini-2.5-Pro, have rapidly advanced in long-context reasoning, memory retention, and tool usage, mitigating many limitations that originally motivated MAS designs. In this paper, we conduct an extensive empirical study comparing MAS and SAS across various popular agentic applications. We find that the benefits of MAS over SAS diminish as LLM capabilities improve, and we propose efficient mechanisms to pinpoint the error-prone agent in MAS. Furthermore, the performance discrepancy between MAS and SAS motivates our design of a hybrid agentic paradigm, request cascading between MAS and SAS, to improve both efficiency and capability. Our design improves accuracy by 1.1-12% while reducing deployment costs by up to 20% across various agentic applications.

Related papers

• Single-Agent LLMs Outperform Multi-Agent Systems on Multi-Hop Reasoning Under Equal Thinking Token Budgets [14.028807574426748]
  We present an information-theoretic argument, grounded in the Data Processing Inequality.<n>We find that SAS consistently match or outperform MAS on multi-hop reasoning tasks when reasoning tokens are held constant.<n>Overall, our results suggest that, for multi-hop reasoning tasks, many reported advantages of multi-agent systems are better explained by unaccounted computation and context effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T18:47:48Z)
• AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agent [57.10083973844841]
  AgentArk is a novel framework to distill multi-agent dynamics into the weights of a single model.<n>We investigate three hierarchical distillation strategies across various models, tasks, scaling, and scenarios.<n>By shifting the burden of computation from inference to training, the distilled models preserve the efficiency of one agent while exhibiting strong reasoning and self-correction performance of multiple agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T19:18:28Z)
• Understanding Agent Scaling in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems via Diversity [48.409368133277525]
  We present an information-theoretic framework showing that MAS performance is bounded by the intrinsic task uncertainty, not by agent count.<n>We derive architecture-agnostic bounds demonstrating that improvements depend on how many effective channels the system accesses.<n>Our results provide principled guidelines for building efficient and robust MAS through diversity-aware design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T17:58:10Z)
• MAS-Orchestra: Understanding and Improving Multi-Agent Reasoning Through Holistic Orchestration and Controlled Benchmarks [86.05918381895555]
  We propose MASOrchestra as a training-time framework that formulates MAS orchestration as a function-calling reinforcement learning problem.<n>In MAS-Orchestra, complex, goal-oriented subagents are abstracted as callable functions, enabling global reasoning over system structure.<n>Our analysis reveals that MAS gains depend critically on task structure, verification protocols, and the capabilities of both orchestrator and subagents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T04:57:02Z)
• Orchestrating Intelligence: Confidence-Aware Routing for Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration across Multi-Scale Models [41.494768986191104]
  OI-MAS is a novel multi-agent framework that implements an adaptive model-selection policy across a heterogeneous pool of multi-scale models.<n>We show that OI-MAS consistently outperforms baseline multi-agent systems, improving accuracy by up to 12.88% while reducing cost by up to 79.78%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T11:56:09Z)
• Multi-Agent Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization [67.12841355267678]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on multi-turn tool-integrated planning for knowledge-intensive and complex reasoning tasks.<n>Existing implementations typically rely on a single agent, but they suffer from limited context length and noisy tool responses.<n>No existing methods support effective reinforcement learning post-training of tool-integrated multi-agent frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T10:44:04Z)
• InfiAgent: Self-Evolving Pyramid Agent Framework for Infinite Scenarios [28.65914611521654]
  InfiAgent is a Pyramid-like DAG-based Multi-Agent Framework that can be applied to textbfinfinite scenarios.<n>InfiAgent achieves 9.9% higher performance compared to ADAS (similar auto-generated agent framework)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:44:09Z)
• Multiple Weaks Win Single Strong: Large Language Models Ensemble Weak Reinforcement Learning Agents into a Supreme One [28.264011412168347]
  Model ensemble is a useful approach in reinforcement learning (RL) for training effective agents.<n>We propose LLM-Ens, a novel approach that enhances RL model ensemble with task-specific semantic understandings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T09:35:43Z)
• MAS-ZERO: Designing Multi-Agent Systems with Zero Supervision [76.42361936804313]
  We introduce MAS-ZERO, the first self-evolved, inference-time framework for automatic MAS design.<n> MAS-ZERO employs meta-level design to iteratively generate, evaluate, and refine MAS configurations tailored to each problem instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T00:56:09Z)
• HERA: Hybrid Edge-cloud Resource Allocation for Cost-Efficient AI Agents [9.064429605488026]
  In the realm of AI, large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, central to the operation of AI agents, predominantly operate in the cloud.<n>With local-based small language models (SLMs) becoming more accurate, the necessity of cloud-exclusive processing is being reconsidered.<n>We propose the Adaptive Iteration-level Model Selector (AIMS) to automatically partition AI agent's subtasks between local-based SLM and cloud-based LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T05:36:13Z)
• Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? [91.39266556855513]
  We present MAST (Multi-Agent System Failure taxonomy), the first empirically grounded taxonomy designed to understand MAS failures.<n>We analyze seven popular MAS frameworks across over 200 tasks, involving six expert human annotators.<n>We identify 14 unique failure modes, organized into 3 overarching categories, (i) specification issues, (ii) inter-agent misalignment, and (iii) task verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T19:04:38Z)
• SMoA: Improving Multi-agent Large Language Models with Sparse Mixture-of-Agents [14.08299391695986]
  We propose a sparse mixture-of-agents (SMoA) framework to improve the efficiency and diversity of multi-agent LLMs. SMoA introduces novel Response Selection and Early Stopping mechanisms to sparsify information flows among individual LLM agents. Experiments on reasoning, alignment, and fairness benchmarks demonstrate that SMoA achieves performance comparable to traditional mixture-of-agents approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:33:39Z)
• AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agents [52.13695464678006]
  This study enhances an LLM-based web agent by simply refining its observation and action space.<n>AgentOccam surpasses the previous state-of-the-art and concurrent work by 9.8 (+29.4%) and 5.9 (+15.8%) absolute points respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:50:38Z)
• A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaboration [55.35849138235116]
  We propose automatically selecting a team of agents from candidates to collaborate in a dynamic communication structure toward different tasks and domains. Specifically, we build a framework named Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network ($textDyLAN$) for LLM-powered agent collaboration. We demonstrate that DyLAN outperforms strong baselines in code generation, decision-making, general reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning tasks with moderate computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T16:05:48Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Microprocessor Design Space Exploration [71.95914457415624]
  Microprocessor architects are increasingly resorting to domain-specific customization in the quest for high-performance and energy-efficiency. We propose an alternative formulation that leverages Multi-Agent RL (MARL) to tackle this problem. Our evaluation shows that the MARL formulation consistently outperforms single-agent RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T17:10:24Z)
• ACE: Cooperative Multi-agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-Dependency [65.28061634546577]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from the non-stationarity problem. In this paper, we propose bidirectional action-dependent Q-learning (ACE) ACE outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms on Google Research Football and StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T10:22:55Z)
• Scalable Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Actor-Attention-Critic [54.2180984002807]
  Multi-agent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (MA-AIRL) is a recent approach that applies single-agent AIRL to multi-agent problems. We propose a multi-agent inverse RL algorithm that is more sample-efficient and scalable than previous works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T20:30:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.