Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19443v1
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 03:00:21 GMT
- Title: Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
- Authors: Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Manoj Karkee,
- Abstract summary: Review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding.<n> Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational interaction.<n>Agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention.
- Score: 0.36868085124383626
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding. While both leverage large language models (LLMs), they differ fundamentally in autonomy, architectural design, and the role of the developer. Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational workflows that support ideation, experimentation, and creative exploration. In contrast, agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention. We propose a detailed taxonomy spanning conceptual foundations, execution models, feedback loops, safety mechanisms, debugging strategies, and real-world tool ecosystems. Through comparative workflow analysis and 20 detailed use cases, we illustrate how vibe systems thrive in early-stage prototyping and education, while agentic systems excel in enterprise-grade automation, codebase refactoring, and CI/CD integration. We further examine emerging trends in hybrid architectures, where natural language interfaces are coupled with autonomous execution pipelines. Finally, we articulate a future roadmap for agentic AI, outlining the infrastructure needed for trustworthy, explainable, and collaborative systems. Our findings suggest that successful AI software engineering will rely not on choosing one paradigm, but on harmonizing their strengths within a unified, human-centered development lifecycle.
Related papers
- Towards Embodied Agentic AI: Review and Classification of LLM- and VLM-Driven Robot Autonomy and Interaction [0.4786416643636131]
Foundation models, including large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have recently enabled novel approaches to robot autonomy and human-robot interfaces.<n>In parallel, vision-language-action models (VLAs) or large behavior models (BLMs) are increasing the dexterity and capabilities of robotic systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T11:48:03Z) - Vibe Coding as a Reconfiguration of Intent Mediation in Software Development: Definition, Implications, and Research Agenda [4.451779041553598]
vibe coding is a software development paradigm where humans and generative AI engage in collaborative flow to co-create software artifacts.<n>We show that vibe coding reconfigures cognitive work by redistributing labor between humans and machines.<n>We identify key opportunities, including democratization, acceleration, and systemic leverage, alongside risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-29T15:44:55Z) - Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z) - Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [79.04813794804377]
Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z) - AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges [0.36868085124383626]
This study critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and challenge analysis.<n>Generative AI is positioned as a precursor, with AI Agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements.<n>Agentic AI systems represent a paradigmatic shift marked by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and orchestrated autonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T16:21:33Z) - Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z) - AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z) - AI Agentic workflows and Enterprise APIs: Adapting API architectures for the age of AI agents [0.0]
Generative AI has catalyzed the emergence of autonomous AI agents, presenting unprecedented challenges for enterprise computing infrastructures.<n>Current enterprise API architectures are predominantly designed for human-driven, predefined interaction patterns, rendering them ill-equipped to support intelligent agents' dynamic, goal-oriented behaviors.<n>This research systematically examines the architectural adaptations for enterprise APIs to support AI agentic effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T05:55:16Z) - How Developers Interact with AI: A Taxonomy of Human-AI Collaboration in Software Engineering [8.65285948382426]
We propose a taxonomy of interaction types between developers and AI tools, identifying eleven distinct interaction types.<n>Building on this taxonomy, we outline a research agenda focused on optimizing AI interactions, improving developer control, and addressing trust and usability challenges in AI-assisted development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T12:53:49Z) - Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges.
We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow.
We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z) - ComfyBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Agents in ComfyUI for Autonomously Designing Collaborative AI Systems [80.69865295743149]
This work attempts to study using LLM-based agents to design collaborative AI systems autonomously.<n>Based on ComfyBench, we develop ComfyAgent, a framework that empowers agents to autonomously design collaborative AI systems by generating.<n>While ComfyAgent achieves a comparable resolve rate to o1-preview and significantly surpasses other agents on ComfyBench, ComfyAgent has resolved only 15% of creative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T17:44:10Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - An Interactive Agent Foundation Model [49.77861810045509]
We propose an Interactive Agent Foundation Model that uses a novel multi-task agent training paradigm for training AI agents.
Our training paradigm unifies diverse pre-training strategies, including visual masked auto-encoders, language modeling, and next-action prediction.
We demonstrate the performance of our framework across three separate domains -- Robotics, Gaming AI, and Healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T18:58:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.