Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPO

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19770v1
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:54:02 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPO
• Authors: Ruizhe Shi, Minhak Song, Runlong Zhou, Zihan Zhang, Maryam Fazel, Simon S. Du,
• Abstract summary: We decompose the performance gap between reinforcement learning from human feedback and direct preference optimization under a representation gap.<n>We show that RLHF, DPO, or online DPO can outperform one another depending on the type of model mis-specifications.
• Score: 51.22869332661607
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a fine-grained theoretical analysis of the performance gap between reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO) under a representation gap. Our study decomposes this gap into two sources: an explicit representation gap under exact optimization and an implicit representation gap under finite samples. In the exact optimization setting, we characterize how the relative capacities of the reward and policy model classes influence the final policy qualities. We show that RLHF, DPO, or online DPO can outperform one another depending on the type of model mis-specifications. Notably, online DPO can outperform both RLHF and standard DPO when the reward and policy model classes are isomorphic and both mis-specified. In the approximate optimization setting, we provide a concrete construction where the ground-truth reward is implicitly sparse and show that RLHF requires significantly fewer samples than DPO to recover an effective reward model -- highlighting a statistical advantage of two-stage learning. Together, these results provide a comprehensive understanding of the performance gap between RLHF and DPO under various settings, and offer practical insights into when each method is preferred.

Related papers

• Towards Self-Improvement of Diffusion Models via Group Preference Optimization [10.6096255671291]
  Group Preference Optimization (GPO) is an effective self-improvement method that enhances performance without requiring external data.<n>GPO improves the accurate counting and text rendering capabilities of the Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium by 20 percentage points.<n>As a plug-and-play method, no extra overhead is introduced during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T10:04:57Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Iterative DPO: A Comprehensive Empirical Investigation [29.579349371114702]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a cost-effective alternative to reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs)<n>We show that a single round of DPO with coarse filtering significantly enhances mathematical reasoning performance.<n>With simple verifiable rewards, our model achieves RL-level performance with significantly lower computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T06:28:25Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities.<n>Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments.<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• A Simple and Effective Reinforcement Learning Method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Fine-tuning [61.403275660120606]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has emerged as a powerful approach for aligning diffusion models with black-box objectives.<n>We propose leave-one-out PPO (LOOP), a novel RL for diffusion fine-tuning method.<n>Our results demonstrate that LOOP effectively improves diffusion models on various black-box objectives, and achieves a better balance between computational efficiency and performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T13:43:53Z)
• MPPO: Multi Pair-wise Preference Optimization for LLMs with Arbitrary Negative Samples [22.521746860874305]
  This study introduces the MPPO algorithm, which leverages the average likelihood of model responses to fit the reward function.<n>Through a comparison of Point-wise, Pair-wise, and List-wise implementations, we found that the Pair-wise approach achieves the best performance.<n> Experimental results demonstrate MPPO's outstanding performance across various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T14:18:58Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Models [63.71853401569461]
  We propose D2PO, discriminator-guided DPO, for the online setting where preferences are being collected throughout learning. As we collect gold preferences, we use these not only to train our policy, but to train a discriminative response evaluation model to silver-label even more synthetic data for policy training. We show conditions under which silver labeling is most helpful: it is most effective when training the policy with DPO, outperforming traditional PPO, and benefits from maintaining a separate discriminator from the policy model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:44:41Z)
• DPO: A Differential and Pointwise Control Approach to Reinforcement Learning [3.2857981869020327]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) in continuous state-action spaces remains challenging in scientific computing.<n>We introduce Differential Reinforcement Learning (Differential RL), a novel framework that reformulates RL from a continuous-time control perspective.<n>We develop Differential Policy Optimization (DPO), a pointwise, stage-wise algorithm that refines local movement operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T03:11:12Z)
• Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences [24.645259298082436]
  We take a step towards a deeper understanding of learning from human preferences by systematically comparing the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) with the recently proposed paradigm of direct preference optimization (DPO) We derive minimax statistical bounds on the suboptimality gap induced by both RLHF and DPO. We extend our analysis to the approximate optimization setting and derive exponentially decaying convergence rates for both RLHF and DPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T09:13:14Z)
• Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
  We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences. We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin. We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.