CP-Router: An Uncertainty-Aware Router Between LLM and LRM
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19970v1
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:33:31 GMT
- Title: CP-Router: An Uncertainty-Aware Router Between LLM and LRM
- Authors: Jiayuan Su, Fulin Lin, Zhaopeng Feng, Han Zheng, Teng Wang, Zhenyu Xiao, Xinlong Zhao, Zuozhu Liu, Lu Cheng, Hongwei Wang,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) produce unnecessarily lengthy outputs even for simple queries.<n>We propose CP-, a training-free and model-agnostic routing framework that dynamically selects between an LLM and an LRM.<n>CP- efficiently reduces token usage while maintaining or even improving accuracy compared to using LRM alone.
- Score: 15.980590561603256
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have significantly improved long-chain reasoning capabilities over Large Language Models (LLMs). However, LRMs often produce unnecessarily lengthy outputs even for simple queries, leading to inefficiencies or even accuracy degradation compared to LLMs. To overcome this, we propose CP-Router, a training-free and model-agnostic routing framework that dynamically selects between an LLM and an LRM, demonstrated with multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) prompts. The routing decision is guided by the prediction uncertainty estimates derived via Conformal Prediction (CP), which provides rigorous coverage guarantees. To further refine the uncertainty differentiation across inputs, we introduce Full and Binary Entropy (FBE), a novel entropy-based criterion that adaptively selects the appropriate CP threshold. Experiments across diverse MCQA benchmarks, including mathematics, logical reasoning, and Chinese chemistry, demonstrate that CP-Router efficiently reduces token usage while maintaining or even improving accuracy compared to using LRM alone. We also extend CP-Router to diverse model pairings and open-ended QA, where it continues to demonstrate strong performance, validating its generality and robustness.
Related papers
- Know What You Know: Metacognitive Entropy Calibration for Verifiable RL Reasoning [31.629261193485053]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex real-world tasks.<n>Most existing outcome-only RLVR pipelines rely almost exclusively on a binary correctness signal and largely ignore the model's intrinsic uncertainty.<n>We propose EGPO, a metacognitive entropy calibration framework that explicitly integrates intrinsic uncertainty into RLVR for enhancing LRMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T08:40:06Z) - ORCH: many analyses, one merge-a deterministic multi-agent orchestrator for discrete-choice reasoning with EMA-guided routing [0.6445605125467574]
ORCH is a framework for discrete-choice reasoning that orchestrates heterogeneous language models.<n>It uses fixed rules for task decomposition and answer aggregation, keeping the pipeline predictable, reproducible, and training-free.<n>Experiments on MMLU, MMLU-Pro, and GSM8K show that ORCH consistently outperforms single-model baselines and a majority-vote ensemble.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T08:27:58Z) - RISER: Orchestrating Latent Reasoning Skills for Adaptive Activation Steering [62.63376387138257]
We propose a plug-and-play intervention framework that adaptively steers large language models (LLMs) reasoning in activation space.<n>RISER constructs a library of reusable reasoning vectors and employs a lightweight Router to dynamically compose them for each input.<n>The Router is optimized via reinforcement learning under task-level rewards, activating latent cognitive primitives in an emergent and compositional manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T08:04:33Z) - Reasoning with Confidence: Efficient Verification of LLM Reasoning Steps via Uncertainty Heads [104.9566359759396]
We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on data-driven uncertainty scores.<n>Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their uncertainty and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-09T03:38:29Z) - Linking Process to Outcome: Conditional Reward Modeling for LLM Reasoning [30.302863491794543]
Process Reward Models (PRMs) aim to guide their step-by-step reasoning toward a final answer.<n>Existing PRMs fail to capture inter-step dependencies, or struggle to align process rewards with the final outcome.<n>We propose Conditional Reward Modeling that frames reasoning as a temporal process leading to a correct answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T17:38:45Z) - A Fano-Style Accuracy Upper Bound for LLM Single-Pass Reasoning in Multi-Hop QA [65.38186593873313]
Multi-Hop Question Answering (MHQA) requires integrating dispersed, interdependent evidence through sequential reasoning under noise.<n>We introduce a proof-of-concept multi-call framework for MHQA, InfoQA.<n>We construct a stringent and noise-rich benchmark to validate our theory and framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:11:57Z) - RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memory [57.449129198822476]
RCR is a role-aware context routing framework for multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems.<n>It dynamically selects semantically relevant memory subsets for each agent based on its role and task stage.<n>A lightweight scoring policy guides memory selection, and agent outputs are integrated into a shared memory store.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T21:59:34Z) - Dynamically Adaptive Reasoning via LLM-Guided MCTS for Efficient and Context-Aware KGQA [6.765017336265049]
This paper proposes Dynamically Adaptive MCTS-based Reasoning (DAMR) for Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA)<n>DAMR integrates symbolic search with adaptive path evaluation for efficient and context-aware KGQA.<n>Experiments on multiple KGQA benchmarks show DAMR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T15:38:21Z) - ReasonFlux-PRM: Trajectory-Aware PRMs for Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs [56.32212611983997]
We introduce ReasonFlux-PRM, a novel trajectory-aware PRM to evaluate trajectory-response type of reasoning traces.<n>ReasonFlux-PRM incorporates both step-level and trajectory-level supervision, enabling fine-grained reward assignment aligned with structured chain-of-thought data.<n>Our derived ReasonFlux-PRM-7B yields consistent performance improvements, achieving average gains of 12.1% in supervised fine-tuning, 4.5% in reinforcement learning, and 6.3% in test-time scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T17:59:02Z) - Token Constraint Decoding Improves Robustness on Question Answering for Large Language Models [4.078176555898098]
We introduce and evaluate Token Constraint Decoding (TCD)<n>This simple yet effective inference-time algorithm enforces alignment between token-level predictions to enhance robustness in noisy settings.<n>Our findings establish TCD as a practical, model-agnostic approach for improving reasoning stability under real-world imperfections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T05:33:56Z) - Learning to Route Queries Across Knowledge Bases for Step-wise Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [60.84901522792042]
Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) has shown promise in mitigating hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We propose R1, a novel MRAG framework that learns to decide when and where to retrieve knowledge based on the evolving reasoning state.<n>R1- can adaptively and effectively leverage diverse KBs, reducing unnecessary retrievals and improving both efficiency and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T08:17:57Z) - Prolonged Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Certainty-Based Adaptive Routing for Efficient LLM/MLLM Reasoning [27.498043430208085]
Excessive reliance on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning can impair model performance.<n>We propose Certainty-based Adaptive Reasoning (CAR)<n>CAR switches between short answers and long-form reasoning based on the model perplexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T06:20:17Z) - AdaCoT: Pareto-Optimal Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Triggering via Reinforcement Learning [30.265984245328124]
Chain-of-Thought prompting indiscriminately generates lengthy reasoning steps for all queries.<n>AdaCoT (Adaptive Chain-of-Thought) is a novel framework enabling LLMs to adaptively decide when to invoke CoT.<n>A key technical contribution is Selective Loss Masking (SLM), designed to counteract decision boundary collapse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T08:27:00Z) - How Robust Are Router-LLMs? Analysis of the Fragility of LLM Routing Capabilities [62.474732677086855]
Large language model (LLM) routing has emerged as a crucial strategy for balancing computational costs with performance.<n>We propose the DSC benchmark: Diverse, Simple, and Categorized, an evaluation framework that categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T19:52:30Z) - Confident or Seek Stronger: Exploring Uncertainty-Based On-device LLM Routing From Benchmarking to Generalization [61.02719787737867]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed and democratized on edge devices.<n>One promising solution is uncertainty-based SLM routing, offloading high-stakes queries to stronger LLMs when resulting in low-confidence responses on SLM.<n>We conduct a comprehensive investigation into benchmarking and generalization of uncertainty-driven routing strategies from SLMs to LLMs over 1500+ settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T18:59:11Z) - Enhancing Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Language Models through Direct Q-Function Optimization [49.362750475706235]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) plays a crucial role in aligning large language models with human preferences and improving their ability to perform complex tasks.<n>We introduce Direct Q-function Optimization (DQO), which formulates the response generation process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and utilizes the soft actor-critic (SAC) framework to optimize a Q-function directly parameterized by the language model.<n> Experimental results on two math problem-solving datasets, GSM8K and MATH, demonstrate that DQO outperforms previous methods, establishing it as a promising offline reinforcement learning approach for aligning language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T23:29:20Z) - Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling [9.44858963874474]
Self-Consistency mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning paths.<n>We introduce Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), a novel framework that enhances sampling efficiency and reasoning faithfulness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T05:14:59Z) - Making Large Language Models Better Planners with Reasoning-Decision Alignment [70.5381163219608]
We motivate an end-to-end decision-making model based on multimodality-augmented LLM.
We propose a reasoning-decision alignment constraint between the paired CoTs and planning results.
We dub our proposed large language planners with reasoning-decision alignment as RDA-Driver.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T16:43:47Z) - On Practical Robust Reinforcement Learning: Practical Uncertainty Set
and Double-Agent Algorithm [11.748284119769039]
Robust reinforcement learning (RRL) aims at seeking a robust policy to optimize the worst case performance over an uncertainty set of Markov decision processes (MDPs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T08:52:09Z) - On Continual Model Refinement in Out-of-Distribution Data Streams [64.62569873799096]
Real-world natural language processing (NLP) models need to be continually updated to fix the prediction errors in out-of-distribution (OOD) data streams.
Existing continual learning (CL) problem setups cannot cover such a realistic and complex scenario.
We propose a new CL problem formulation dubbed continual model refinement (CMR)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T11:54:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.