Spurious Privacy Leakage in Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20095v2
• Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:21:16 GMT
• Title: Spurious Privacy Leakage in Neural Networks
• Authors: Chenxiang Zhang, Jun Pang, Sjouke Mauw,
• Abstract summary: We introduce emphspurious privacy leakage, a phenomenon in which spurious groups are significantly more vulnerable to privacy attacks than non-spurious groups.<n>We demonstrate that spurious robust methods, designed to reduce spurious bias, fail to mitigate privacy disparity.<n>Our analysis reveals that this occurs because robust methods can reduce reliance on spurious features for prediction, but do not prevent their memorization during training.
• Score: 13.439099770154948
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Neural networks trained on real-world data often exhibit biases while simultaneously being vulnerable to privacy attacks aimed at extracting sensitive information. Despite extensive research on each problem individually, their intersection remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the privacy impact of spurious correlation bias. We introduce \emph{spurious privacy leakage}, a phenomenon in which spurious groups are significantly more vulnerable to privacy attacks than non-spurious groups. We observe that privacy disparity between groups increases in tasks with simpler objectives (e.g. fewer classes) due to spurious features. Counterintuitively, we demonstrate that spurious robust methods, designed to reduce spurious bias, fail to mitigate privacy disparity. Our analysis reveals that this occurs because robust methods can reduce reliance on spurious features for prediction, but do not prevent their memorization during training. Finally, we systematically compare the privacy of different model architectures trained with spurious data, demonstrating that, contrary to previous work, architectural choice can affect privacy evaluation.

Related papers

• Privacy Amplification by Missing Data [4.9024539661445825]
  We analyze missing data as a privacy amplification mechanism within the framework of differential privacy.<n>We show, for the first time, that incomplete data can yield privacy amplification for differentially private algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T10:28:41Z)
• On the MIA Vulnerability Gap Between Private GANs and Diffusion Models [51.53790101362898]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models have emerged as leading approaches for high-quality image synthesis.<n>We present the first unified theoretical and empirical analysis of the privacy risks faced by differentially private generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:18:22Z)
• Enforcing Demographic Coherence: A Harms Aware Framework for Reasoning about Private Data Release [14.939460540040459]
  We introduce demographic coherence, a condition inspired by privacy attacks that we argue is necessary for data privacy.<n>Our framework focuses on confidence rated predictors, which can in turn be distilled from almost any data-informed process.<n>We prove that every differentially private data release is also demographically coherent, and that there are demographically coherent algorithms which are not differentially private.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T20:42:30Z)
• Activity Recognition on Avatar-Anonymized Datasets with Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  Privacy-preserving computer vision is an important emerging problem in machine learning and artificial intelligence.<n>We present anonymization pipeline that replaces sensitive human subjects in video datasets with synthetic avatars within context.<n>We also proposeMaskDP to protect non-anonymized but privacy sensitive background information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• Unveiling Privacy Vulnerabilities: Investigating the Role of Structure in Graph Data [17.11821761700748]
  This study advances the understanding and protection against privacy risks emanating from network structure. We develop a novel graph private attribute inference attack, which acts as a pivotal tool for evaluating the potential for privacy leakage through network structures. Our attack model poses a significant threat to user privacy, and our graph data publishing method successfully achieves the optimal privacy-utility trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T07:40:54Z)
• Secure Aggregation is Not Private Against Membership Inference Attacks [66.59892736942953]
  We investigate the privacy implications of SecAgg in federated learning. We show that SecAgg offers weak privacy against membership inference attacks even in a single training round. Our findings underscore the imperative for additional privacy-enhancing mechanisms, such as noise injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T15:07:58Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees [65.3684804101664]
  We consider partial differential privacy (DP), which allows quantifying the privacy guarantee on a per-attribute basis. In this work, we study several basic data analysis and learning tasks, and design algorithms whose per-attribute privacy parameter is smaller that the best possible privacy parameter for the entire record of a person.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T22:43:50Z)
• On the Privacy Effect of Data Enhancement via the Lens of Memorization [20.63044895680223]
  We propose to investigate privacy from a new perspective called memorization. Through the lens of memorization, we find that previously deployed MIAs produce misleading results as they are less likely to identify samples with higher privacy risks. We demonstrate that the generalization gap and privacy leakage are less correlated than those of the previous results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T13:02:17Z)
• Smooth Anonymity for Sparse Graphs [69.1048938123063]
  differential privacy has emerged as the gold standard of privacy, however, when it comes to sharing sparse datasets. In this work, we consider a variation of $k$-anonymity, which we call smooth-$k$-anonymity, and design simple large-scale algorithms that efficiently provide smooth-$k$-anonymity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T17:09:25Z)
• The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative [76.46529413546725]
  We show an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. It suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:25:56Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queries [74.59376038272661]
  We introduce sampling attack, a novel membership inference technique that unlike other standard membership adversaries is able to work under severe restriction of no access to scores of the victim model. We show that a victim model that only publishes the labels is still susceptible to sampling attacks and the adversary can recover up to 100% of its performance. For defense, we choose differential privacy in the form of gradient perturbation during the training of the victim model as well as output perturbation at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T12:54:54Z)
• Learning With Differential Privacy [3.618133010429131]
  Differential privacy comes to the rescue with a proper promise of protection against leakage. It uses a randomized response technique at the time of collection of the data which promises strong privacy with better utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T02:04:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.