Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20161v1
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:05:10 GMT
- Title: Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning
- Authors: Jaehun Jung, Seungju Han, Ximing Lu, Skyler Hallinan, David Acuna, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Mostafa Patwary, Mohammad Shoeybi, Bryan Catanzaro, Yejin Choi,
- Abstract summary: We show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in language models.<n>We introduce G-Vendi, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced gradients.<n>We present Prismatic Synthesis, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data.
- Score: 77.120955854093
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Effective generalization in language models depends critically on the diversity of their training data. Yet existing diversity metrics often fall short of this goal, relying on surface-level heuristics that are decoupled from model behavior. This motivates us to ask: What kind of diversity in training data actually drives generalization in language models -- and how can we measure and amplify it? Through large-scale empirical analyses spanning over 300 training runs, carefully controlled for data scale and quality, we show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in LLM reasoning -- as measured by average model performance on unseen out-of-distribution benchmarks. We introduce G-Vendi, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced gradients. Despite using a small off-the-shelf proxy model for gradients, G-Vendi consistently outperforms alternative measures, achieving strong correlation (Spearman's $\rho \approx 0.9$) with out-of-distribution (OOD) performance on both natural language inference (NLI) and math reasoning tasks. Building on this insight, we present Prismatic Synthesis, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data by targeting underrepresented regions in gradient space. Experimental results show that Prismatic Synthesis consistently improves model performance as we scale synthetic data -- not just on in-distribution test but across unseen, out-of-distribution benchmarks -- significantly outperforming state-of-the-art models that rely on 20 times larger data generator than ours. For example, PrismMath-7B, our model distilled from a 32B LLM, outperforms R1-Distill-Qwen-7B -- the same base model trained on proprietary data generated by 671B R1 -- on 6 out of 7 challenging benchmarks.
Related papers
- Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z) - Synthetic Feature Augmentation Improves Generalization Performance of Language Models [8.463273762997398]
Training and fine-tuning deep learning models on limited and imbalanced datasets poses substantial challenges.<n>We propose augmenting features in the embedding space by generating synthetic samples using a range of techniques.<n>We validate the effectiveness of this approach across multiple open-source text classification benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-11T04:31:18Z) - Hybrid Training Approaches for LLMs: Leveraging Real and Synthetic Data to Enhance Model Performance in Domain-Specific Applications [0.0]
This research explores a hybrid approach to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs)
By leveraging a dataset combining transcribed real interactions with high-quality synthetic sessions, we aimed to overcome the limitations of domain-specific real data.
The study evaluated three models: a base foundational model, a model fine-tuned with real data, and a hybrid fine-tuned model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T18:16:03Z) - Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios.
We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples.
Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z) - Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distribution [67.9215891673174]
We propose score entropy as a novel loss that naturally extends score matching to discrete spaces.
We test our Score Entropy Discrete Diffusion models on standard language modeling tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T17:59:12Z) - Private Synthetic Data Meets Ensemble Learning [15.425653946755025]
When machine learning models are trained on synthetic data and then deployed on real data, there is often a performance drop.
We introduce a new ensemble strategy for training downstream models, with the goal of enhancing their performance when used on real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-15T04:24:42Z) - A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional
Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT.
The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous.
We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z) - How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating
and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion.
Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.