Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-Free Gibbs-like Guidance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21101v1
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 12:27:33 GMT
• Title: Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-Free Gibbs-like Guidance
• Authors: Badr Moufad, Yazid Janati, Alain Durmus, Ahmed Ghorbel, Eric Moulines, Jimmy Olsson,
• Abstract summary: CFG is a technique for improving conditional diffusion models by linearly combining the outputs of conditional and unconditional denoisers.<n>While CFG enhances visual quality and improves alignment with prompts, it often reduces sample diversity.<n>We propose a Gibbs-like sampling procedure to draw samples from the desired tilted distribution.
• Score: 19.83064246586143
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) is a widely used technique for improving conditional diffusion models by linearly combining the outputs of conditional and unconditional denoisers. While CFG enhances visual quality and improves alignment with prompts, it often reduces sample diversity, leading to a challenging trade-off between quality and diversity. To address this issue, we make two key contributions. First, CFG generally does not correspond to a well-defined denoising diffusion model (DDM). In particular, contrary to common intuition, CFG does not yield samples from the target distribution associated with the limiting CFG score as the noise level approaches zero -- where the data distribution is tilted by a power $w \gt 1$ of the conditional distribution. We identify the missing component: a R\'enyi divergence term that acts as a repulsive force and is required to correct CFG and render it consistent with a proper DDM. Our analysis shows that this correction term vanishes in the low-noise limit. Second, motivated by this insight, we propose a Gibbs-like sampling procedure to draw samples from the desired tilted distribution. This method starts with an initial sample from the conditional diffusion model without CFG and iteratively refines it, preserving diversity while progressively enhancing sample quality. We evaluate our approach on both image and text-to-audio generation tasks, demonstrating substantial improvements over CFG across all considered metrics. The code is available at https://github.com/yazidjanati/cfgig

Related papers

• Diffusion Sampling Path Tells More: An Efficient Plug-and-Play Strategy for Sample Filtering [18.543769006014383]
  Diffusion models often exhibit inconsistent sample quality due to variations inherent in their sampling trajectories.<n>We introduce CFG-Rejection, an efficient, plug-and-play strategy that filters low-quality samples at an early stage of the denoising process.<n>We validate the effectiveness of CFG-Rejection in image generation through extensive experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T11:08:24Z)
• Few-Step Diffusion via Score identity Distillation [67.07985339442703]
  Diffusion distillation has emerged as a promising strategy for accelerating text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models.<n>Existing methods rely on real or teacher-synthesized images to perform well when distilling high-resolution T2I diffusion models.<n>We propose two new guidance strategies: Zero-CFG, which disables CFG in the teacher and removes text conditioning in the fake score network, and Anti-CFG, which applies negative CFG in the fake score network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T03:45:16Z)
• Nested Annealed Training Scheme for Generative Adversarial Networks [54.70743279423088]
  This paper focuses on a rigorous mathematical theoretical framework: the composite-functional-gradient GAN (CFG)<n>We reveal the theoretical connection between the CFG model and score-based models.<n>We find that the training objective of the CFG discriminator is equivalent to finding an optimal D(x)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T07:44:09Z)
• Contrastive CFG: Improving CFG in Diffusion Models by Contrasting Positive and Negative Concepts [55.298031232672734]
  As-Free Guidance (CFG) has proven effective in conditional diffusion model sampling for improved condition alignment. We present a novel method to enhance negative CFG guidance using contrastive loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T03:29:27Z)
• Rectified Diffusion Guidance for Conditional Generation [62.00207951161297]
  We revisit the theory behind CFG and rigorously confirm that the improper configuration of the combination coefficients (i.e., the widely used summing-to-one version) brings about expectation shift of the generative distribution. We propose ReCFG with a relaxation on the guidance coefficients such that denoising with ReCFG strictly aligns with the diffusion theory. That way the rectified coefficients can be readily pre-computed via traversing the observed data, leaving the sampling speed barely affected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T13:41:32Z)
• Theory on Score-Mismatched Diffusion Models and Zero-Shot Conditional Samplers [49.97755400231656]
  We present the first performance guarantee with explicit dimensional dependencies for general score-mismatched diffusion samplers.<n>We show that score mismatches result in an distributional bias between the target and sampling distributions, proportional to the accumulated mismatch between the target and training distributions.<n>This result can be directly applied to zero-shot conditional samplers for any conditional model, irrespective of measurement noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:42:12Z)
• Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Models [27.640009920058187]
  We revisit the CFG update rule and introduce modifications to address this issue. We propose down-weighting the parallel component to achieve high-quality generations without oversaturation. We also introduce a new rescaling momentum method for the CFG update rule based on this insight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T12:06:29Z)
• Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Corrector [8.970133799609041]
  CFG is the dominant method of conditional sampling for text-to-image diffusion models. We disprove common misconceptions by showing that CFG interacts differently with DDPM and DDIM. We prove that in the SDE limit, CFG is actually equivalent to combining a DDIM predictor for the conditional distribution together with a Langevin dynamics corrector for a gamma-powered distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T20:00:55Z)
• Adaptive Guidance: Training-free Acceleration of Conditional Diffusion Models [44.58960475893552]
  "Adaptive Guidance" (AG) is an efficient variant of computation-Free Guidance (CFG) AG preserves CFG's image quality while reducing by 25%. " LinearAG" offers even cheaper inference at the cost of deviating from the baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T17:08:48Z)
• Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distribution [67.9215891673174]
  We propose score entropy as a novel loss that naturally extends score matching to discrete spaces. We test our Score Entropy Discrete Diffusion models on standard language modeling tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T17:59:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.