Multilingual vs Crosslingual Retrieval of Fact-Checked Claims: A Tale of Two Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22118v1
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 08:47:10 GMT
• Title: Multilingual vs Crosslingual Retrieval of Fact-Checked Claims: A Tale of Two Approaches
• Authors: Alan Ramponi, Marco Rovera, Robert Moro, Sara Tonelli,
• Abstract summary: We examine strategies to improve the multilingual and crosslingual performance.<n>We evaluate approaches on a dataset containing posts and claims in 47 languages.<n>Most importantly, we show that crosslinguality is a setup with its own unique characteristics compared to the multilingual setup.
• Score: 5.850200023135349
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval of previously fact-checked claims is a well-established task, whose automation can assist professional fact-checkers in the initial steps of information verification. Previous works have mostly tackled the task monolingually, i.e., having both the input and the retrieved claims in the same language. However, especially for languages with a limited availability of fact-checks and in case of global narratives, such as pandemics, wars, or international politics, it is crucial to be able to retrieve claims across languages. In this work, we examine strategies to improve the multilingual and crosslingual performance, namely selection of negative examples (in the supervised) and re-ranking (in the unsupervised setting). We evaluate all approaches on a dataset containing posts and claims in 47 languages (283 language combinations). We observe that the best results are obtained by using LLM-based re-ranking, followed by fine-tuning with negative examples sampled using a sentence similarity-based strategy. Most importantly, we show that crosslinguality is a setup with its own unique characteristics compared to the multilingual setup.

Related papers

• Word2winners at SemEval-2025 Task 7: Multilingual and Crosslingual Fact-Checked Claim Retrieval [0.7874708385247352]
  This paper describes our system for SemEval 2025 Task 7: Previously Fact-Checked Claim Retrieval.<n>The task requires retrieving relevant fact-checks for a given input claim from the extensive, multilingual MultiClaim dataset.<n>Our best model achieved an accuracy of 85% on crosslingual data and 92% on monolingual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T02:59:41Z)
• Synergistic Approach for Simultaneous Optimization of Monolingual, Cross-lingual, and Multilingual Information Retrieval [5.446052898856584]
  This paper proposes a novel hybrid batch training strategy to improve zero-shot retrieval performance across monolingual, cross-lingual, and multilingual settings. The approach fine-tunes multilingual language models using a mix of monolingual and cross-lingual question-answer pair batches sampled based on dataset size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T04:30:26Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• Do We Need Language-Specific Fact-Checking Models? The Case of Chinese [15.619421104102516]
  This paper investigates the potential benefits of language-specific fact-checking models, focusing on the case of Chinese. We first demonstrate the limitations of translation-based methods and multilingual large language models, highlighting the need for language-specific systems. We propose a Chinese fact-checking system that can better retrieve evidence from a document by incorporating context information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:26:03Z)
• Efficiently Aligned Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning for Conversational Tasks using Prompt-Tuning [98.60739735409243]
  Cross-lingual transfer of language models trained on high-resource languages like English has been widely studied for many NLP tasks. We introduce XSGD for cross-lingual alignment pretraining, a parallel and large-scale multilingual conversation dataset. To facilitate aligned cross-lingual representations, we develop an efficient prompt-tuning-based method for learning alignment prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-03T18:46:01Z)
• Multilingual Relation Classification via Efficient and Effective Prompting [9.119073318043952]
  We present the first work on prompt-based multilingual relation classification (RC) We introduce an efficient and effective method that constructs prompts from relation triples and involves only minimal translation for the class labels. We evaluate its performance in fully supervised, few-shot and zero-shot scenarios, and analyze its effectiveness across 14 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T08:40:23Z)
• CONCRETE: Improving Cross-lingual Fact-checking with Cross-lingual Retrieval [73.48591773882052]
  Most fact-checking approaches focus on English only due to the data scarcity issue in other languages. We present the first fact-checking framework augmented with crosslingual retrieval. We train the retriever with our proposed Crosslingual Inverse Cloze Task (XICT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T17:36:14Z)
• Bridging Cross-Lingual Gaps During Leveraging the Multilingual Sequence-to-Sequence Pretraining for Text Generation [80.16548523140025]
  We extend the vanilla pretrain-finetune pipeline with extra code-switching restore task to bridge the gap between the pretrain and finetune stages. Our approach could narrow the cross-lingual sentence representation distance and improve low-frequency word translation with trivial computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T16:08:38Z)
• Matching Tweets With Applicable Fact-Checks Across Languages [27.762055254009017]
  We focus on automatically finding existing fact-checks for claims made in social media posts (tweets) We conduct both classification and retrieval experiments, in monolingual (English only), multilingual (Spanish, Portuguese), and cross-lingual (Hindi-English) settings. We present promising results for "match" classification (93% average accuracy) in four language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T23:33:02Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• On the Language Neutrality of Pre-trained Multilingual Representations [70.93503607755055]
  We investigate the language-neutrality of multilingual contextual embeddings directly and with respect to lexical semantics. Our results show that contextual embeddings are more language-neutral and, in general, more informative than aligned static word-type embeddings. We show how to reach state-of-the-art accuracy on language identification and match the performance of statistical methods for word alignment of parallel sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T19:50:32Z)
• XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization [128.37244072182506]
  Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilinguals XTREME is a benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks. We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:09:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.