GitGoodBench: A Novel Benchmark For Evaluating Agentic Performance On Git

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22583v1
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 16:56:11 GMT
• Title: GitGoodBench: A Novel Benchmark For Evaluating Agentic Performance On Git
• Abstract summary: GitGoodBench is a novel benchmark for evaluating AI agent performance on Version Control System (VCS) tasks.<n>Our benchmark covers three core Git scenarios extracted from open-source Python, Java, and Kotlin repositories.<n>We establish baseline performance on the prototyping version of our benchmark using GPT-4o equipped with custom tools, achieving a 21.11% solve rate overall.
• Score: 0.8397730500554048
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Benchmarks for Software Engineering (SE) AI agents, most notably SWE-bench, have catalyzed progress in programming capabilities of AI agents. However, they overlook critical developer workflows such as Version Control System (VCS) operations. To address this issue, we present GitGoodBench, a novel benchmark for evaluating AI agent performance on VCS tasks. GitGoodBench covers three core Git scenarios extracted from permissive open-source Python, Java, and Kotlin repositories. Our benchmark provides three datasets: a comprehensive evaluation suite (900 samples), a rapid prototyping version (120 samples), and a training corpus (17,469 samples). We establish baseline performance on the prototyping version of our benchmark using GPT-4o equipped with custom tools, achieving a 21.11% solve rate overall. We expect GitGoodBench to serve as a crucial stepping stone toward truly comprehensive SE agents that go beyond mere programming.

Related papers

• Agentic Hardware Design as Repository-Level Code Evolution [8.614736536216526]
  HORIZON is a self-evolving agent framework that treats hardware design as repository-level code evolution.<n>We evaluate our approach on ChipBench, RTLLM, Verilog-Eval, and nine CVDP categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T17:21:06Z)
• ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? [59.40748183470308]
  ProgramBench measures the ability of software engineering agents to develop software holisitically.<n>End-to-end behavioral tests are generated via agent-driven fuzzing.<n>Models favor monolithic, single-file implementations that diverge sharply from human-written code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T09:17:02Z)
• RepoMod-Bench: A Benchmark for Code Repository Modernization via Implementation-Agnostic Testing [1.4069797812477614]
  We introduce a benchmarking framework for repository-level code modernization built on an implementation-agnostic evaluation paradigm.<n>RepoMod-Bench is a benchmark of 21 real-world repositories with standardized interfaces, spanning 8 languages.<n>The benchmark contains 1.6M lines of code (LOC) and 11,616 tests, with repository sizes ranging from 14 to 211K LOC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T01:25:00Z)
• FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Development [42.26354337364403]
  FeatureBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic coding performance in end-to-end, feature-oriented software development.<n>It incorporates an execution-based evaluation protocol and a scalable test-driven method that automatically derives tasks from code repositories with minimal human effort.<n> Empirical evaluation reveals that the state-of-the-art agentic model, such as Claude 4.5 Opus, achieves a 74.4% resolved rate on SWE-bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T16:06:32Z)
• ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development [49.63491095660809]
  ProjDevBench is an end-to-end benchmark that provides project requirements to coding agents and evaluates the resulting repositories.<n>We curate 20 programming problems across 8 categories, covering both concept-oriented tasks and real-world application scenarios.<n>Our evaluation reports an overall acceptance rate of 27.38%: agents handle basic functionality but struggle with complex system design, time optimization, and resource management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T05:17:23Z)
• RepoGenesis: Benchmarking End-to-End Microservice Generation from Readme to Repository [52.98970048197381]
  RepoGenesis is the first multilingual benchmark for repository-level end-to-end web microservice generation.<n>It consists of 106 repositories (60 Python, 46 Java) across 18 domains and 11 frameworks, with 1,258 API endpoints and 2,335 test cases verified.<n>Results reveal that despite high AC (up to 73.91%) and DSR (up to 100%), the best-performing system achieves only 23.67% Pass@1 on Python and 21.45% on Java.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T13:19:20Z)
• ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development [72.4729759618632]
  We introduce ABC-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow.<n>We curated 224 practical tasks spanning 8 languages and 19 frameworks from open-source repositories.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle to deliver reliable performance on these holistic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T08:23:52Z)
• SWE-Bench++: A Framework for the Scalable Generation of Software Engineering Benchmarks from Open-Source Repositories [2.951332247539421]
  We introduce SWE-Bench++, an automated framework that generates repository-level coding tasks from open-source GitHub projects.<n>Unlike synthetic approaches, our pipeline harvests live pull requests to cover both bug fixes and feature requests across 11 languages.<n>Our initial benchmark consists of 11,133 instances from 3,971 repositories across 11 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T10:16:51Z)
• SWE-Sharp-Bench: A Reproducible Benchmark for C# Software Engineering Tasks [7.04771396439844]
  SWE-Sharp-Bench is a software engineering benchmark for C# featuring 150 instances from 17 repositories.<n>While 70% of Python tasks in SWE-Bench Verified are solved, only 40% of our C# tasks are resolved.<n>We open-source SWE-Sharp-Bench and our entire curation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T08:16:23Z)
• SCUBA: Salesforce Computer Use Benchmark [63.66753028386581]
  SCUBA is a benchmark designed to evaluate computer-use agents on customer relationship management ( CRM) within the Salesforce platform.<n> SCUBA contains 300 task instances derived from real user interviews, spanning three primary personas, platform administrators, sales representatives, and service agents.<n>We benchmark a diverse set of agents under both zero-shot and demonstration-augmented settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T16:48:49Z)
• Git Context Controller: Manage the Context of LLM-based Agents like Git [6.521644491529639]
  Large language model (LLM) based agents have shown impressive capabilities by interleaving internal reasoning with external tool use.<n>We introduce Git-Context-Controller (GCC), a structured context management framework inspired by software version control systems.<n>In a self-replication case study, a GCC-augmented agent builds a new CLI agent from scratch, achieving 40.7 task resolution, compared to only 11.7 without GCC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:01:45Z)
• Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks [94.69724201080155]
  We show that many agentic benchmarks have issues in task setup or reward design.<n>Such issues can lead to under- or overestimation of agents' performance by up to 100% in relative terms.<n>We introduce the Agentic Benchmark Checklist (ABC), a set of guidelines that we synthesized from our benchmark-building experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T17:35:31Z)
• UTBoost: Rigorous Evaluation of Coding Agents on SWE-Bench [8.00058513405915]
  We introduce UTGenerator, an LLM-driven test case generator to generate test cases for real-world Python projects.<n>Building on UTGenerator, we propose UTBoost, a comprehensive framework for test case augmentation.<n>In our evaluation, we identified 36 task instances with insufficient test cases and uncovered 345 erroneous patches incorrectly labeled as passed in the original SWE Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T22:56:49Z)
• SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving [90.32201622392137]
  We present SwingArena, a competitive evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike traditional static benchmarks, SwingArena models the collaborative process of software by pairing LLMs as iterations, who generate patches, and reviewers, who create test cases and verify the patches through continuous integration (CI) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:28:02Z)
• SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents [49.73885480071402]
  We introduce SWE-PolyBench, a new benchmark for repository-level, execution-based evaluation of coding agents.<n>SWE-PolyBench contains 2110 instances from 21 repositories and includes tasks in Java (165), JavaScript (1017), TypeScript (729) and Python (199), covering bug fixes, feature additions, and code.<n>Our experiments show that current agents exhibit uneven performances across languages and struggle with complex problems while showing higher performance on simpler tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T17:08:02Z)
• Automated Benchmark Generation for Repository-Level Coding Tasks [7.305342793164905]
  SetUpAgent is a fully automated system capable of historically accurate dependency setup, test execution, and result parsing.<n>We generate two new datasets: (i) SWEE-Bench an extended version of SWE-Bench encompassing hundreds of repositories, and (ii) SWA-Bench a benchmark focusing on applications rather than libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T17:42:49Z)
• CLOVER: A Test Case Generation Benchmark with Coverage, Long-Context, and Verification [71.34070740261072]
  This paper presents a benchmark, CLOVER, to evaluate models' capabilities in generating and completing test cases.<n>The benchmark is containerized for code execution across tasks, and we will release the code, data, and construction methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T21:42:56Z)
• Evaluating Software Development Agents: Patch Patterns, Code Quality, and Issue Complexity in Real-World GitHub Scenarios [13.949319911378826]
  This study evaluated 4,892 patches from 10 top-ranked agents on 500 real-world GitHub issues.<n>No single agent dominated, with 170 issues unresolved, indicating room for improvement.<n>Most agents maintained code reliability and security, avoiding new bugs or vulnerabilities.<n>Some agents increased code complexity, many reduced code duplication and minimized code smells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T11:33:57Z)
• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents [106.87436596397816]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have shown great potential in solving real-world software engineering (SWE) problems. We propose DEI (Diversity Empowered Intelligence), a framework that leverages their unique expertise. Experiments show that a DEI-guided committee of agents is able to surpass the best individual agent's performance by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T17:50:28Z)
• GitAgent: Facilitating Autonomous Agent with GitHub by Tool Extension [81.44231422624055]
  A growing area of research focuses on Large Language Models (LLMs) equipped with external tools capable of performing diverse tasks. In this paper, we introduce GitAgent, an agent capable of achieving the autonomous tool extension from GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T15:47:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.