Human Empathy as Encoder: AI-Assisted Depression Assessment in Special Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23631v3
• Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 08:26:26 GMT
• Title: Human Empathy as Encoder: AI-Assisted Depression Assessment in Special Education
• Authors: Boning Zhao, Xinnuo Li, Yutong Hu,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces Human Empathy as tacit (HEAE), a novel, human-centered AI framework for transparent and socially responsible depression severity assessment.<n>Our approach uniquely integrates student narrative text with a teacher-derived, 9-dimensional "Empathy Vector" (EV), its dimensions guided by the PHQ-9 framework.<n> Rigorous experiments optimized the multimodal fusion, text representation, and classification architecture, achieving 82.74% accuracy for 7-level severity classification.
• Score: 1.79131354609831
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Assessing student depression in sensitive environments like special education is challenging. Standardized questionnaires may not fully reflect students' true situations. Furthermore, automated methods often falter with rich student narratives, lacking the crucial, individualized insights stemming from teachers' empathetic connections with students. Existing methods often fail to address this ambiguity or effectively integrate educator understanding. To address these limitations by fostering a synergistic human-AI collaboration, this paper introduces Human Empathy as Encoder (HEAE), a novel, human-centered AI framework for transparent and socially responsible depression severity assessment. Our approach uniquely integrates student narrative text with a teacher-derived, 9-dimensional "Empathy Vector" (EV), its dimensions guided by the PHQ-9 framework,to explicitly translate tacit empathetic insight into a structured AI input enhancing rather than replacing human judgment. Rigorous experiments optimized the multimodal fusion, text representation, and classification architecture, achieving 82.74% accuracy for 7-level severity classification. This work demonstrates a path toward more responsible and ethical affective computing by structurally embedding human empathy

Related papers

• Human attribution of empathic behaviour to AI systems [0.3364554138758564]
  We examined differences in perceived empathy signals between human-written and large language model (LLM)-generated relationship advice, and the influence of authorship labels.<n>Findings suggest that perceptions of empathic communication are primarily driven by linguistic features rather than authorship beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T11:57:06Z)
• Humanizing AI Grading: Student-Centered Insights on Fairness, Trust, Consistency and Transparency [0.6138671548064355]
  This study investigates students' perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) grading systems in an undergraduate computer science course.<n>Findings reveal concerns about AI's lack of contextual understanding and personalization.<n>This work contributes to ethics-centered assessment practices by amplifying student voices and offering design principles for humanizing AI in designed learning environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T01:18:10Z)
• Reflecting Twice before Speaking with Empathy: Self-Reflective Alternating Inference for Empathy-Aware End-to-End Spoken Dialogue [53.95386201009769]
  We introduce EmpathyEval, a descriptive natural-language-based evaluation model for assessing empathetic quality in spoken dialogues.<n>We propose ReEmpathy, an end-to-end Spoken Language Models that enhances empathetic dialogue through a novel Empathetic Self-Reflective Alternating Inference mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T09:04:50Z)
• Human or AI? Comparing Design Thinking Assessments by Teaching Assistants and Bots [0.38233569758620045]
  This study investigates the reliability and perceived accuracy of AI-assisted assessment compared to TA-assisted assessment in evaluating student posters in design thinking education.<n>Results showed low statistical agreement between instructor and AI scores for empathy and pain points, with slightly higher alignment for visual communication.<n>The study underscores the need for hybrid assessment models that integrate computational efficiency with human insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T07:09:21Z)
• SENSE-7: Taxonomy and Dataset for Measuring User Perceptions of Empathy in Sustained Human-AI Conversations [13.232694774856931]
  We propose a human-centered taxonomy that emphasizes observable empathic behaviors.<n>We introduce a new dataset, Sense-7, of real-world conversations between information workers and Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Analysis of 695 conversations from 109 participants reveals that empathy judgments are highly individualized, context-sensitive, and vulnerable to disruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T21:32:24Z)
• Feeling Machines: Ethics, Culture, and the Rise of Emotional AI [18.212492056071657]
  This paper explores the growing presence of emotionally responsive artificial intelligence through a critical and interdisciplinary lens.<n>It explores how AI systems that simulate or interpret human emotions are reshaping our interactions in areas such as education, healthcare, mental health, caregiving, and digital life.<n>The analysis is structured around four central themes: the ethical implications of emotional AI, the cultural dynamics of human-machine interaction, the risks and opportunities for vulnerable populations, and the emerging regulatory, design, and technical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T10:28:26Z)
• Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
  Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• The AI Interface: Designing for the Ideal Machine-Human Experience (Editorial) [1.8074330674710588]
  This editorial introduces a Special Issue that explores the psychology of AI experience design.<n>Papers in this collection highlight the complexities of trust, transparency, and emotional sensitivity in human-AI interaction.<n>By findings from eight diverse studies, this editorial underscores the need for AI interfaces to balance efficiency with empathy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T15:17:32Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• APTNESS: Incorporating Appraisal Theory and Emotion Support Strategies for Empathetic Response Generation [71.26755736617478]
  Empathetic response generation is designed to comprehend the emotions of others. We develop a framework that combines retrieval augmentation and emotional support strategy integration. Our framework can enhance the empathy ability of LLMs from both cognitive and affective empathy perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T02:23:37Z)
• Empathy Detection from Text, Audiovisual, Audio or Physiological Signals: A Systematic Review of Task Formulations and Machine Learning Methods [5.7306786636466995]
  Detecting empathy has potential applications in society, healthcare and education.<n>Despite being a broad and overlapping topic, the avenue of empathy detection leveraging Machine Learning remains underexplored.<n>This paper provides a structured overview of recent advancements and remaining challenges towards developing a robust empathy detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T08:34:12Z)
• EMP-EVAL: A Framework for Measuring Empathy in Open Domain Dialogues [0.0]
  EMP-EVAL is a simple yet effective automatic empathy evaluation method. The proposed technique takes the influence of Emotion, Cognitive and Emotional empathy. We show that our metrics can correlate with human preference, achieving comparable results with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-29T18:42:19Z)
• CASE: Aligning Coarse-to-Fine Cognition and Affection for Empathetic Response Generation [59.8935454665427]
  Empathetic dialogue models usually consider only the affective aspect or treat cognition and affection in isolation. We propose the CASE model for empathetic dialogue generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T14:28:38Z)
• Exemplars-guided Empathetic Response Generation Controlled by the Elements of Human Communication [88.52901763928045]
  We propose an approach that relies on exemplars to cue the generative model on fine stylistic properties that signal empathy to the interlocutor. We empirically show that these approaches yield significant improvements in empathetic response quality in terms of both automated and human-evaluated metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T14:02:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.