More-than-Human Storytelling: Designing Longitudinal Narrative Engagements with Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23780v1
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 06:10:29 GMT
• Title: More-than-Human Storytelling: Designing Longitudinal Narrative Engagements with Generative AI
• Authors: Émilie Fabre, Katie Seaborn, Shuta Koiwai, Mizuki Watanabe, Paul Riesch,
• Abstract summary: We explored multi-generational experiences with "Dreamsmithy," a daily dream-crafting app, where participants co-created stories with AI narrator "Makoto" every day.<n>Re Reflexive thematic analysis revealed themes like "oscillating ambivalence" and "socio-chronological bonding"<n>Results underscore the potential of GenAI for longitudinal storytelling, but also raise critical questions about user agency and ethics.
• Score: 22.33628995313466
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Longitudinal engagement with generative AI (GenAI) storytelling agents is a timely but less charted domain. We explored multi-generational experiences with "Dreamsmithy," a daily dream-crafting app, where participants (N = 28) co-created stories with AI narrator "Makoto" every day. Reflections and interactions were captured through a two-week diary study. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed themes likes "oscillating ambivalence" and "socio-chronological bonding," highlighting the complex dynamics that emerged between individuals and the AI narrator over time. Findings suggest that while people appreciated the personal notes, opportunities for reflection, and AI creativity, limitations in narrative coherence and control occasionally caused frustration. The results underscore the potential of GenAI for longitudinal storytelling, but also raise critical questions about user agency and ethics. We contribute initial empirical insights and design considerations for developing adaptive, more-than-human storytelling systems.

Related papers

• WhatELSE: Shaping Narrative Spaces at Configurable Level of Abstraction for AI-bridged Interactive Storytelling [11.210282687859534]
  WhatELSE is an AI-bridged IN authoring system that creates narrative possibility spaces from example stories.<n>We show that WhatELSE enables authors to perceive and edit the narrative space and generates engaging interactive narratives at play-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T21:02:15Z)
• Towards Enhanced Immersion and Agency for LLM-based Interactive Drama [55.770617779283064]
  This paper begins with understanding interactive drama from two aspects: Immersion, the player's feeling of being present in the story, and Agency.<n>To enhance these two aspects, we first propose Playwriting-guided Generation, a novel method that helps LLMs craft dramatic stories with substantially improved structures and narrative quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T06:06:16Z)
• REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation [51.97224538045096]
  We introduce REALTALK, a 21-day corpus of authentic messaging app dialogues.<n>We compare EI attributes and persona consistency to understand the challenges posed by real-world dialogues.<n>Our findings reveal that models struggle to simulate a user solely from dialogue history, while fine-tuning on specific user chats improves persona emulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T20:29:01Z)
• Charting the Shapes of Stories with Game Theory [41.8376313099588]
  We use AI to model the structure of stories as game-theoretic objects, amenable to quantitative analysis.<n>We demonstrate our proposed technique on Shakespeare's famous Romeo and Juliet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T21:12:16Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? [114.34140090869175]
  This paper investigates the capability of LLMs in storytelling, focusing on narrative development and plot progression. We introduce a novel computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. We show that explicit integration of discourse features can enhance storytelling, as is demonstrated by over 40% improvement in neural storytelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:02:49Z)
• Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective [32.477369282996385]
  AI systems need to be explainable to the humans in the loop. We will discuss how the AI agent can use mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T22:22:21Z)
• SARD: A Human-AI Collaborative Story Generation [0.0]
  We propose SARD, a drag-and-drop visual interface for generating a multi-chapter story using large language models. Our evaluation of the usability of SARD and its creativity support shows that while node-based visualization of the narrative may help writers build a mental model, it exerts unnecessary mental overhead to the writer. We also found that AI generates stories that are less lexically diverse, irrespective of the complexity of the story.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T17:48:42Z)
• Affective and Dynamic Beam Search for Story Generation [50.3130767805383]
  We propose Affective Story Generator (AffGen) for generating interesting narratives. AffGen employs two novel techniques-Dynamic Beam Sizing and Affective Reranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T16:37:14Z)
• Experimental Narratives: A Comparison of Human Crowdsourced Storytelling and AI Storytelling [0.0]
  The study analyzes 250 stories authored by crowdworkers in June 2019 and 80 stories generated by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Both crowdworkers and large language models responded to identical prompts about creating and falling in love with an artificial human. The analysis reveals that narratives from GPT-3.5 and particularly GPT-4 are more progressive in terms of gender roles and sexuality than those written by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T16:54:38Z)
• Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytelling [73.14508303965683]
  We interviewed eighteen data workers from both industry and academia to learn where and how they would like to collaborate with AI.<n>Surprisingly, though the participants showed excitement about collaborating with AI, many of them also expressed reluctance and pointed out nuanced reasons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T15:30:05Z)
• StoryBuddy: A Human-AI Collaborative Chatbot for Parent-Child Interactive Storytelling with Flexible Parental Involvement [61.47157418485633]
  We developed StoryBuddy, an AI-enabled system for parents to create interactive storytelling experiences. A user study validated StoryBuddy's usability and suggested design insights for future parent-AI collaboration systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T04:53:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.