Multi-Domain ABSA Conversation Dataset Generation via LLMs for Real-World Evaluation and Model Comparison

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24701v1
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:17 GMT
• Title: Multi-Domain ABSA Conversation Dataset Generation via LLMs for Real-World Evaluation and Model Comparison
• Authors: Tejul Pandit, Meet Raval, Dhvani Upadhyay,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an approach for generating synthetic ABSA data using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We detail the generation process aimed at producing data with consistent topic and sentiment distributions across multiple domains using GPT-4o.<n>Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the synthetic data, revealing distinct performance trade-offs among the models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) offers granular insights into opinions but often suffers from the scarcity of diverse, labeled datasets that reflect real-world conversational nuances. This paper presents an approach for generating synthetic ABSA data using Large Language Models (LLMs) to address this gap. We detail the generation process aimed at producing data with consistent topic and sentiment distributions across multiple domains using GPT-4o. The quality and utility of the generated data were evaluated by assessing the performance of three state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and DeepSeek-R1) on topic and sentiment classification tasks. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the synthetic data, revealing distinct performance trade-offs among the models: DeepSeekR1 showed higher precision, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet exhibited strong recall, and Gemini 1.5 Pro offered significantly faster inference. We conclude that LLM-based synthetic data generation is a viable and flexible method for creating valuable ABSA resources, facilitating research and model evaluation without reliance on limited or inaccessible real-world labeled data.

Related papers

• Behaviour Driven Development Scenario Generation with Large Language Models [3.255679497255447]
  This paper presents an evaluation of three LLMs, GPT-4, Claude 3, and Gemini, for automated Behaviour-Driven Development scenarios generation.<n>We constructed a dataset of 500 user stories, requirement descriptions, and their corresponding BDD scenarios, drawn from four proprietary software products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T02:05:48Z)
• Advancing Multinational License Plate Recognition Through Synthetic and Real Data Fusion: A Comprehensive Evaluation [3.3637719592955526]
  We explore the integration of real and synthetic data to enhance LPR performance.<n>Massive incorporation of synthetic data substantially boosts model performance in both intra- and cross-dataset scenarios.<n>Experiments underscore the efficacy of synthetic data in mitigating challenges posed by limited training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T15:52:52Z)
• Aug2Search: Enhancing Facebook Marketplace Search with LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Augmentation [8.358632499600764]
  Aug2Search is an EBR-based framework leveraging synthetic data generated by Generative AI (GenAI) models.<n>This paper investigates the capabilities of GenAI, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), in generating high-quality synthetic data.<n>Aug2Search achieves an improvement of up to 4% in ROC_AUC with 100 million synthetic data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T22:33:40Z)
• An Empirical Study of Validating Synthetic Data for Text-Based Person Retrieval [51.10419281315848]
  We conduct an empirical study to explore the potential of synthetic data for Text-Based Person Retrieval (TBPR) research.<n>We propose an inter-class image generation pipeline, in which an automatic prompt construction strategy is introduced.<n>We develop an intra-class image augmentation pipeline, in which the generative AI models are applied to further edit the images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T06:18:15Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• Beyond QA Pairs: Assessing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Fact Embedding in LLMs [0.0]
  This paper focuses on improving the fine-tuning process by categorizing question-answer pairs into Factual and Conceptual classes.<n>Two distinct Llama-2 models are fine-tuned based on these classifications and evaluated using larger models like GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini.<n>Our results indicate that models trained on conceptual datasets outperform those trained on factual datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T03:26:30Z)
• Large Language Models and Synthetic Data for Monitoring Dataset Mentions in Research Papers [0.0]
  This paper presents a machine learning framework that automates dataset mention detection across research domains.<n>We employ zero-shot extraction from research papers, an LLM-as-a-Judge for quality assessment, and a reasoning agent for refinement to generate a weakly supervised synthetic dataset.<n>At inference, a ModernBERT-based classifier efficiently filters dataset mentions, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T16:16:02Z)
• mmE5: Improving Multimodal Multilingual Embeddings via High-quality Synthetic Data [71.352883755806]
  Multimodal embedding models have gained significant attention for their ability to map data from different modalities, such as text and images, into a unified representation space.<n>However, the limited labeled multimodal data often hinders embedding performance.<n>Recent approaches have leveraged data synthesis to address this problem, yet the quality of synthetic data remains a critical bottleneck.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T15:03:33Z)
• Self-Rationalization in the Wild: A Large Scale Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on NLI-related tasks [59.47851630504264]
  Free-text explanations are expressive and easy to understand, but many datasets lack annotated explanation data.<n>We fine-tune T5-Large and OLMo-7B models and assess the impact of fine-tuning data quality, the number of fine-tuning samples, and few-shot selection methods.<n>The models are evaluated on 19 diverse OOD datasets across three tasks: natural language inference (NLI), fact-checking, and hallucination detection in abstractive summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T10:01:32Z)
• Beyond Sample-Level Feedback: Using Reference-Level Feedback to Guide Data Synthesis [54.15152681093108]
  We introduce Reference-Level Feedback, a paradigm that extracts desirable characteristics from carefully curated reference samples to guide the synthesis of higher-quality instruction-response pairs.<n>Experiments demonstrate that Reference-Level Feedback consistently outperforms traditional sample-level feedback methods, generalizes across model architectures, and produces high-quality and diverse data at low cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T21:29:00Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• Multimodal Preference Data Synthetic Alignment with Reward Model [23.978820500281213]
  We propose a new framework in generating synthetic data using a reward model as a proxy of human preference for effective multimodal alignment with DPO training.<n>Experiment results indicate that integrating selected synthetic data, such as from generative and rewards models can effectively reduce reliance on human-annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T09:29:40Z)
• On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models [34.00031258223175]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data. Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility. We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T22:14:07Z)
• Iterative Data Generation with Large Language Models for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [39.57537769578304]
  We propose a systematic Iterative Data Generation framework, namely IDG, to boost the performance of ABSA. The core of IDG is to make full use of the powerful abilities (i.e., instruction-following, in-context learning and self-reflection) of LLMs to iteratively generate more fluent and diverse pseudo-label data. IDG brings consistent and significant performance gains among five baseline ABSA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T07:00:37Z)
• Learning from Synthetic Data for Visual Grounding [55.21937116752679]
  We show that SynGround can improve the localization capabilities of off-the-shelf vision-and-language models.<n>Data generated with SynGround improves the pointing game accuracy of a pretrained ALBEF and BLIP models by 4.81% and 17.11% absolute percentage points, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:59:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.