Beyond Context to Cognitive Appraisal: Emotion Reasoning as a Theory of Mind Benchmark for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00334v1
• Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 01:18:04 GMT
• Title: Beyond Context to Cognitive Appraisal: Emotion Reasoning as a Theory of Mind Benchmark for Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: This study advances beyond surface-level perceptual features to investigate how large language models (LLMs) reason about others' emotional states using contextual information.<n>Grounded in Cognitive Appraisal Theory, we curate a specialized ToM evaluation dataset1 to assess both forward reasoning - from context to emotion- and backward reasoning - from emotion to inferred context.
• Score: 11.255011967393838
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Datasets used for emotion recognition tasks typically contain overt cues that can be used in predicting the emotions expressed in a text. However, one challenge is that texts sometimes contain covert contextual cues that are rich in affective semantics, which warrant higher-order reasoning abilities to infer emotional states, not simply the emotions conveyed. This study advances beyond surface-level perceptual features to investigate how large language models (LLMs) reason about others' emotional states using contextual information, within a Theory-of-Mind (ToM) framework. Grounded in Cognitive Appraisal Theory, we curate a specialized ToM evaluation dataset1 to assess both forward reasoning - from context to emotion- and backward reasoning - from emotion to inferred context. We showed that LLMs can reason to a certain extent, although they are poor at associating situational outcomes and appraisals with specific emotions. Our work highlights the need for psychological theories in the training and evaluation of LLMs in the context of emotion reasoning.

Related papers

• EMO-R3: Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [62.3977734456669]
  We propose Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning (EMO-R3), a framework designed to enhance the emotional reasoning ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We introduce Structured Emotional Thinking to guide the model to perform step-by-step emotional reasoning in a structured and interpretable manner, and design a Reflective Emotional Reward that enables the model to re-evaluate its reasoning based on visual-text consistency and emotional coherence.<n>EMO-R3 significantly improves both the interpretability and emotional intelligence of MLLMs, achieving superior performance across multiple visual emotional understanding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:42:52Z)
• A Unified Spoken Language Model with Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking for Human-like Interaction [50.05919688888947]
  This paper presents a unified spoken language model for emotional intelligence, enhanced by a novel data construction strategy termed Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking (IEAT)<n>IEAT incorporates user emotional states and their underlying causes into the model's internal reasoning process, enabling emotion-aware reasoning to be internalized rather than treated as explicit supervision.<n> Experiments on the Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial) Emotional Intelligence benchmark demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves top-ranked performance across emotional trajectory modeling, emotional reasoning, and empathetic response generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T14:07:30Z)
• Do LLMs "Feel"? Emotion Circuits Discovery and Control [54.57583855608979]
  We study the internal mechanisms that give rise to emotional expression and in controlling emotions in generated text.<n>This is the first systematic study to uncover and validate emotion circuits in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T12:24:24Z)
• Fluent but Unfeeling: The Emotional Blind Spots of Language Models [1.248728117157669]
  A critical gap remains in evaluating whether Large Language Models (LLMs) align with human emotions at a fine-grained level.<n>We introduce Express, a benchmark dataset curated from Reddit communities featuring 251 fine-grained, self-disclosed emotion labels.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation framework examines predicted emotion terms and decomposes them into eight basic emotions using established emotion theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T16:31:13Z)
• Do Machines Think Emotionally? Cognitive Appraisal Analysis of Large Language Models [13.341709038654198]
  We introduce a large-scale benchmark on Cognitive Reasoning for Emotions to evaluate internal cognitive structures implicitly used by Large Language Models.<n>Our results and analyses reveal diverse reasoning patterns across different LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T22:19:15Z)
• Think out Loud: Emotion Deducing Explanation in Dialogues [57.90554323226896]
  We propose a new task "Emotion Deducing Explanation in Dialogues" (EDEN) EDEN recognizes emotion and causes in an explicitly thinking way. It can help Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve better recognition of emotions and causes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T08:58:29Z)
• ECR-Chain: Advancing Generative Language Models to Better Emotion-Cause Reasoners through Reasoning Chains [61.50113532215864]
  Causal Emotion Entailment (CEE) aims to identify the causal utterances in a conversation that stimulate the emotions expressed in a target utterance. Current works in CEE mainly focus on modeling semantic and emotional interactions in conversations. We introduce a step-by-step reasoning method, Emotion-Cause Reasoning Chain (ECR-Chain), to infer the stimulus from the target emotional expressions in conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T15:45:08Z)
• Emotion Rendering for Conversational Speech Synthesis with Heterogeneous Graph-Based Context Modeling [50.99252242917458]
  Conversational Speech Synthesis (CSS) aims to accurately express an utterance with the appropriate prosody and emotional inflection within a conversational setting. To address the issue of data scarcity, we meticulously create emotional labels in terms of category and intensity. Our model outperforms the baseline models in understanding and rendering emotions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T08:47:50Z)
• Where are We in Event-centric Emotion Analysis? Bridging Emotion Role Labeling and Appraisal-based Approaches [10.736626320566707]
  The term emotion analysis in text subsumes various natural language processing tasks. We argue that emotions and events are related in two ways. We discuss how to incorporate psychological appraisal theories in NLP models to interpret events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T09:56:29Z)
• Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench [83.41621219298489]
  We evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) anthropomorphic capabilities using the emotion appraisal theory from psychology. We collect a dataset containing over 400 situations that have proven effective in eliciting the eight emotions central to our study. We conduct a human evaluation involving more than 1,200 subjects worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T15:18:30Z)
• Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Prediction [14.555520007106656]
  In psychology, the class of emotion theories known as appraisal theories aims at explaining the link between events and emotions. We analyze the suitability of appraisal theories for emotion analysis in text with the goal of understanding if appraisal concepts can reliably be reconstructed by annotators. Our comparison of text classification methods to human annotators shows that both can reliably detect emotions and appraisals with similar performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T17:20:17Z)
• x-enVENT: A Corpus of Event Descriptions with Experiencer-specific Emotion and Appraisal Annotations [13.324006587838523]
  We argue that a classification setup for emotion analysis should be performed in an integrated manner, including the different semantic roles that participate in an emotion episode. Based on appraisal theories in psychology, we compile an English corpus of written event descriptions. The descriptions depict emotion-eliciting circumstances, and they contain mentions of people who responded emotionally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T12:02:06Z)
• A Circular-Structured Representation for Visual Emotion Distribution Learning [82.89776298753661]
  We propose a well-grounded circular-structured representation to utilize the prior knowledge for visual emotion distribution learning. To be specific, we first construct an Emotion Circle to unify any emotional state within it. On the proposed Emotion Circle, each emotion distribution is represented with an emotion vector, which is defined with three attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T14:53:27Z)
• DialogueCRN: Contextual Reasoning Networks for Emotion Recognition in Conversations [0.0]
  We propose novel Contextual Reasoning Networks (DialogueCRN) to fully understand the conversational context from a cognitive perspective. Inspired by the Cognitive Theory of Emotion, we design multi-turn reasoning modules to extract and integrate emotional clues. The reasoning module iteratively performs an intuitive retrieving process and a conscious reasoning process, which imitates human unique cognitive thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T16:47:38Z)
• Enhancing Cognitive Models of Emotions with Representation Learning [58.2386408470585]
  We present a novel deep learning-based framework to generate embedding representations of fine-grained emotions. Our framework integrates a contextualized embedding encoder with a multi-head probing model. Our model is evaluated on the Empathetic Dialogue dataset and shows the state-of-the-art result for classifying 32 emotions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T16:55:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.