MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00855v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 06:28:36 GMT
• Title: MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book
• Authors: Sau Lai Yip, Sunan He, Yuxiang Nie, Shu Pui Chan, Yilin Ye, Sum Ying Lam, Hao Chen,
• Abstract summary: We present MedBookVQA, a systematic and comprehensive multimodal benchmark derived from open-access medical textbooks.<n>We generate 5,000 clinically relevant questions spanning modality recognition, classification, anatomical identification, symptom diagnosis, and surgical procedures.<n>We evaluate a wide array of MLLMs, including proprietary, open-sourced, medical, and reasoning models, revealing significant performance disparities across task types and model categories.
• Score: 5.318470975871017
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The accelerating development of general medical artificial intelligence (GMAI), powered by multimodal large language models (MLLMs), offers transformative potential for addressing persistent healthcare challenges, including workforce deficits and escalating costs. The parallel development of systematic evaluation benchmarks emerges as a critical imperative to enable performance assessment and provide technological guidance. Meanwhile, as an invaluable knowledge source, the potential of medical textbooks for benchmark development remains underexploited. Here, we present MedBookVQA, a systematic and comprehensive multimodal benchmark derived from open-access medical textbooks. To curate this benchmark, we propose a standardized pipeline for automated extraction of medical figures while contextually aligning them with corresponding medical narratives. Based on this curated data, we generate 5,000 clinically relevant questions spanning modality recognition, disease classification, anatomical identification, symptom diagnosis, and surgical procedures. A multi-tier annotation system categorizes queries through hierarchical taxonomies encompassing medical imaging modalities (42 categories), body anatomies (125 structures), and clinical specialties (31 departments), enabling nuanced analysis across medical subdomains. We evaluate a wide array of MLLMs, including proprietary, open-sourced, medical, and reasoning models, revealing significant performance disparities across task types and model categories. Our findings highlight critical capability gaps in current GMAI systems while establishing textbook-derived multimodal benchmarks as essential evaluation tools. MedBookVQA establishes textbook-derived benchmarking as a critical paradigm for advancing clinical AI, exposing limitations in GMAI systems while providing anatomically structured performance metrics across specialties.

Related papers

• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• MedIQA: A Scalable Foundation Model for Prompt-Driven Medical Image Quality Assessment [26.185840831950063]
  Existing medical IQA methods, however, struggle to generalize across diverse modalities and clinical scenarios.<n>We introduce MedIQA, the first comprehensive foundation model for medical IQA, designed to handle variability in image dimensions, modalities, anatomical regions, and types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T07:02:47Z)
• PyTDC: A multimodal machine learning training, evaluation, and inference platform for biomedical foundation models [59.17570021208177]
  PyTDC is a machine-learning platform providing streamlined training, evaluation, and inference software for multimodal biological AI models.<n>This paper discusses the components of PyTDC's architecture and, to our knowledge, the first-of-its-kind case study on the introduced single-cell drug-target nomination ML task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T18:15:38Z)
• From large language models to multimodal AI: A scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine [40.23383597339471]
  multimodal AI is capable of integrating diverse data modalities, including imaging, text, and structured data, within a single model.<n>This scoping review explores the evolution of multimodal AI, highlighting its methods, applications, datasets, and evaluation in clinical settings.<n>Our findings underscore a shift from unimodal to multimodal approaches, driving innovations in diagnostic support, medical report generation, drug discovery, and conversational AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T11:57:51Z)
• A Survey of Medical Vision-and-Language Applications and Their Techniques [48.268198631277315]
  Medical vision-and-language models (MVLMs) have attracted substantial interest due to their capability to offer a natural language interface for interpreting complex medical data. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of MVLMs and the various medical tasks to which they have been applied. We also examine the datasets used for these tasks and compare the performance of different models based on standardized evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T03:27:05Z)
• Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets. Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for Large Language Model benchmarks in the medical domain [1.6752458252726457]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) constitute a breakthrough state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology. We outline Cognitive Network Evaluation Toolkit for Medical Domains (COGNET-MD) We propose a scoring-framework with increased difficulty to assess the ability of LLMs in interpreting medical text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T16:31:56Z)
• MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence using Federated Evaluation [110.31526448744096]
  We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data. We are building MedPerf, an open framework for benchmarking machine learning in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T18:09:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.