Learning What Matters: Prioritized Concept Learning via Relative Error-driven Sample Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01085v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 17:05:35 GMT
• Title: Learning What Matters: Prioritized Concept Learning via Relative Error-driven Sample Selection
• Authors: Shivam Chandhok, Qian Yang, Oscar Manas, Kanishk Jain, Leonid Sigal, Aishwarya Agrawal,
• Abstract summary: We propose PRioritized cOncept learninG via Relative Error-driven Sample Selection (PROGRESS)<n>PROGRESS is a data- and compute-efficient framework that enables vision-language models to dynamically select what to learn next.<n>We show that PROGRESS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines with much less data and supervision.
• Score: 38.35524024887503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Instruction tuning has been central to the success of recent vision-language models (VLMs), but it remains expensive-requiring large-scale datasets, high-quality annotations, and large compute budgets. We propose PRioritized cOncept learninG via Relative Error-driven Sample Selection (PROGRESS), a data- and compute-efficient framework that enables VLMs to dynamically select what to learn next based on their evolving needs during training. At each stage, the model tracks its learning progress across skills and selects the most informative samples-those it has not already mastered and that are not too difficult to learn at the current stage of training. This strategy effectively controls skill acquisition and the order in which skills are learned. Specifically, we sample from skills showing the highest learning progress, prioritizing those with the most rapid improvement. Unlike prior methods, PROGRESS requires no upfront answer annotations, queries answers only on a need basis, avoids reliance on additional supervision from auxiliary VLMs, and does not require compute-heavy gradient computations for data selection. Experiments across multiple instruction-tuning datasets of varying scales demonstrate that PROGRESS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines with much less data and supervision. Additionally, we show strong cross-architecture generalization and transferability to larger models, validating PROGRESS as a scalable solution for efficient learning.

Related papers

• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• From Data-Centric to Sample-Centric: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Progressive Optimization [7.531052649961168]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We investigate RLVR from a sample-centric perspective and introduce LPPO, a framework of progressive optimization techniques.<n>Our work addresses a critical question: how to best leverage a small set of trusted, high-quality demonstrations, rather than simply scaling up data volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T06:05:28Z)
• Active Prompt Learning with Vision-Language Model Priors [9.173468790066956]
  We introduce a class-guided clustering that leverages the pre-trained image and text encoders of vision-language models. We propose a budget-saving selective querying based on adaptive class-wise thresholds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T02:34:33Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• Unlearnable Algorithms for In-context Learning [36.895152458323764]
  In this paper, we focus on efficient unlearning methods for the task adaptation phase of a pretrained large language model. We observe that an LLM's ability to do in-context learning for task adaptation allows for efficient exact unlearning of task adaptation training data. We propose a new holistic measure of unlearning cost which accounts for varying inference costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T16:43:04Z)
• Bad Students Make Great Teachers: Active Learning Accelerates Large-Scale Visual Understanding [9.112203072394648]
  Power-law scaling indicates that large-scale training with uniform sampling is prohibitively slow. Active learning methods aim to increase data efficiency by prioritizing learning on the most relevant examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T19:26:13Z)
• ALP: Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception [60.64801970249279]
  We introduce Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception (ALP) ALP incorporates action information into representation learning through a combination of optimizing a reinforcement learning policy and an inverse dynamics prediction objective. We show that ALP outperforms existing baselines in several downstream perception tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T21:51:04Z)
• RPLKG: Robust Prompt Learning with Knowledge Graph [11.893917358053004]
  We propose a new method, robust prompt learning with knowledge graph (RPLKG) Based on the knowledge graph, we automatically design diverse interpretable and meaningful prompt sets. RPLKG shows a significant performance improvement compared to zero-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T08:22:58Z)
• Parrot: Data-Driven Behavioral Priors for Reinforcement Learning [79.32403825036792]
  We propose a method for pre-training behavioral priors that can capture complex input-output relationships observed in successful trials. We show how this learned prior can be used for rapidly learning new tasks without impeding the RL agent's ability to try out novel behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T18:47:40Z)
• Omni-supervised Facial Expression Recognition via Distilled Data [120.11782405714234]
  We propose omni-supervised learning to exploit reliable samples in a large amount of unlabeled data for network training. We experimentally verify that the new dataset can significantly improve the ability of the learned FER model. To tackle this, we propose to apply a dataset distillation strategy to compress the created dataset into several informative class-wise images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T09:36:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.