Linear regression with overparameterized linear neural networks: Tight upper and lower bounds for implicit $\ell^1$-regularization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01143v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 19:55:31 GMT
• Title: Linear regression with overparameterized linear neural networks: Tight upper and lower bounds for implicit $\ell^1$-regularization
• Authors: Hannes Matt, Dominik Stöger,
• Abstract summary: We study implicit regularization in diagonal linear neural networks of depth $Dge 2$ for overparameterized linear regression problems.<n>Our results reveal a qualitative difference between depths: for $D ge 3$, the error decreases linearly with $alpha$, whereas for $D=2$, it decreases at rate $alpha1-varrho$.<n> Numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical findings and suggest that deeper networks, i.e., $D ge 3$, may lead to better generalization.
• Score: 3.902441198412341
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern machine learning models are often trained in a setting where the number of parameters exceeds the number of training samples. To understand the implicit bias of gradient descent in such overparameterized models, prior work has studied diagonal linear neural networks in the regression setting. These studies have shown that, when initialized with small weights, gradient descent tends to favor solutions with minimal $\ell^1$-norm - an effect known as implicit regularization. In this paper, we investigate implicit regularization in diagonal linear neural networks of depth $D\ge 2$ for overparameterized linear regression problems. We focus on analyzing the approximation error between the limit point of gradient flow trajectories and the solution to the $\ell^1$-minimization problem. By deriving tight upper and lower bounds on the approximation error, we precisely characterize how the approximation error depends on the scale of initialization $\alpha$. Our results reveal a qualitative difference between depths: for $D \ge 3$, the error decreases linearly with $\alpha$, whereas for $D=2$, it decreases at rate $\alpha^{1-\varrho}$, where the parameter $\varrho \in [0,1)$ can be explicitly characterized. Interestingly, this parameter is closely linked to so-called null space property constants studied in the sparse recovery literature. We demonstrate the asymptotic tightness of our bounds through explicit examples. Numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical findings and suggest that deeper networks, i.e., $D \ge 3$, may lead to better generalization, particularly for realistic initialization scales.

Related papers

• Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data [86.48154162485712]
  We study the theory of scaling laws in an infinite dimensional linear regression setup. We show that the reducible part of the test error is $Theta(-(a-1) + N-(a-1)/a)$. Our theory is consistent with the empirical neural scaling laws and verified by numerical simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:53:29Z)
• Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limit [75.4661041626338]
  We study the problem of gradient descent learning of a single-index target function $f_*(boldsymbolx) = textstylesigma_*left(langleboldsymbolx,boldsymbolthetarangleright)$<n>We prove that a two-layer neural network optimized by an SGD-based algorithm learns $f_*$ with a complexity that is not governed by information exponents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T17:56:58Z)
• Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks [54.177130905659155]
  Recent studies show that a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) is not a suitable space to model functions by neural networks. In this paper, we study a suitable function space for over- parameterized two-layer neural networks with bounded norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T15:04:07Z)
• A Mean-Field Analysis of Neural Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent for Functional Minimax Optimization [90.87444114491116]
  This paper studies minimax optimization problems defined over infinite-dimensional function classes of overparametricized two-layer neural networks. We address (i) the convergence of the gradient descent-ascent algorithm and (ii) the representation learning of the neural networks. Results show that the feature representation induced by the neural networks is allowed to deviate from the initial one by the magnitude of $O(alpha-1)$, measured in terms of the Wasserstein distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T16:46:08Z)
• Analysis of the expected $L_2$ error of an over-parametrized deep neural network estimate learned by gradient descent without regularization [7.977229957867868]
  Recent results show that estimates defined by over-parametrized deep neural networks learned by applying gradient descent to a regularized empirical $L$ risk are universally consistent. In this paper, we show that the regularization term is not necessary to obtain similar results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T17:04:21Z)
• Generalization and Stability of Interpolating Neural Networks with Minimal Width [37.908159361149835]
  We investigate the generalization and optimization of shallow neural-networks trained by gradient in the interpolating regime. We prove the training loss number minimizations $m=Omega(log4 (n))$ neurons and neurons $Tapprox n$. With $m=Omega(log4 (n))$ neurons and $Tapprox n$, we bound the test loss training by $tildeO (1/)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T05:06:15Z)
• Implicit Bias in Leaky ReLU Networks Trained on High-Dimensional Data [63.34506218832164]
  In this work, we investigate the implicit bias of gradient flow and gradient descent in two-layer fully-connected neural networks with ReLU activations. For gradient flow, we leverage recent work on the implicit bias for homogeneous neural networks to show that leakyally, gradient flow produces a neural network with rank at most two. For gradient descent, provided the random variance is small enough, we show that a single step of gradient descent suffices to drastically reduce the rank of the network, and that the rank remains small throughout training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T15:09:54Z)
• High-dimensional Asymptotics of Feature Learning: How One Gradient Step Improves the Representation [89.21686761957383]
  We study the first gradient descent step on the first-layer parameters $boldsymbolW$ in a two-layer network. Our results demonstrate that even one step can lead to a considerable advantage over random features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T12:09:59Z)
• Large-time asymptotics in deep learning [0.0]
  We consider the impact of the final time $T$ (which may indicate the depth of a corresponding ResNet) in training. For the classical $L2$--regularized empirical risk minimization problem, we show that the training error is at most of the order $mathcalOleft(frac1Tright)$. In the setting of $ellp$--distance losses, we prove that both the training error and the optimal parameters are at most of the order $mathcalOleft(e-mu
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T07:33:17Z)
• The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Training [10.72393527290646]
  We study phenomena in the context of two-layers neural networks in the neural tangent (NT) regime. We prove that as soon as $Ndgg n$, the test error is well approximated by one of kernel ridge regression with respect to the infinite-width kernel. The latter is in turn well approximated by the error ridge regression, whereby the regularization parameter is increased by a self-induced' term related to the high-degree components of the activation function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T01:51:13Z)
• Regularization Matters: A Nonparametric Perspective on Overparametrized Neural Network [20.132432350255087]
  Overparametrized neural networks trained by tangent descent (GD) can provably overfit any training data. This paper studies how well overparametrized neural networks can recover the true target function in the presence of random noises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T01:02:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.