Understanding Mental Models of Generative Conversational Search and The Effect of Interface Transparency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03807v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:27:22 GMT
• Title: Understanding Mental Models of Generative Conversational Search and The Effect of Interface Transparency
• Authors: Chadha Degachi, Samuel Kernan Freire, Evangelos Niforatos, Gerd Kortuem,
• Abstract summary: Mental models are internal frameworks for understanding and predicting system behaviour.<n>Most user mental models were too abstract to support users in explaining individual search instances.<n>Findings suggest that mental models may pose a barrier to appropriate trust in conversational search.
• Score: 9.630893350528709
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The experience and adoption of conversational search is tied to the accuracy and completeness of users' mental models -- their internal frameworks for understanding and predicting system behaviour. Thus, understanding these models can reveal areas for design interventions. Transparency is one such intervention which can improve system interpretability and enable mental model alignment. While past research has explored mental models of search engines, those of generative conversational search remain underexplored, even while the popularity of these systems soars. To address this, we conducted a study with 16 participants, who performed 4 search tasks using 4 conversational interfaces of varying transparency levels. Our analysis revealed that most user mental models were too abstract to support users in explaining individual search instances. These results suggest that 1) mental models may pose a barrier to appropriate trust in conversational search, and 2) hybrid web-conversational search is a promising novel direction for future search interface design.

Related papers

• Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [66.52010873968383]
  We introduce a conversational agent that interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through reinforcement learning (RL) training.<n>The experimental results across four widely used conversational benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:55:54Z)
• InteractComp: Evaluating Search Agents With Ambiguous Queries [36.05005463045869]
  We introduce InteractComp, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether search agents can recognize query ambiguity and actively interact to resolve it during search.<n> Evaluation of 17 models reveals striking failure: the best model achieves only 13.73% accuracy despite 71.50% with complete context.<n>This stagnation, coupled with the immediate feedback inherent to search tasks, makes InteractComp a valuable resource for both evaluating and training interaction capabilities in search agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T17:35:54Z)
• Generative Interfaces for Language Models [70.25765232527762]
  We propose a paradigm in which large language models (LLMs) respond to user queries by proactively generating user interfaces (UIs)<n>Our framework leverages structured interface-specific representations and iterative refinements to translate user queries into task-specific UIs.<n>Results show that generative interfaces consistently outperform conversational ones, with up to a 72% improvement in human preference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:43:20Z)
• UniConv: Unifying Retrieval and Response Generation for Large Language Models in Conversations [71.79210031338464]
  We show how to unify dense retrieval and response generation for large language models in conversation.<n>We conduct joint fine-tuning with different objectives and design two mechanisms to reduce the inconsistency risks.<n>The evaluations on five conversational search datasets demonstrate that our unified model can mutually improve both tasks and outperform the existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T17:02:40Z)
• Blending Queries and Conversations: Understanding Tactics, Trust, Verification, and System Choice in Web Search and Chat Interactions [0.8397730500554048]
  This paper presents a user study where participants used an interface combining Web Search and a Generative AI-Chat feature to solve health-related information tasks.<n>We study how people behaved with the interface, why they behaved in certain ways, and what the outcomes of these behaviours were.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T14:59:55Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Query-oriented Data Augmentation for Session Search [71.84678750612754]
  We propose query-oriented data augmentation to enrich search logs and empower the modeling. We generate supplemental training pairs by altering the most important part of a search context. We develop several strategies to alter the current query, resulting in new training data with varying degrees of difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:08:33Z)
• Quriosity: Analyzing Human Questioning Behavior and Causal Inquiry through Curiosity-Driven Queries [91.70689724416698]
  We present Quriosity, a collection of 13.5K naturally occurring questions from three diverse sources.<n>Our analysis reveals a significant presence of causal questions (up to 42%) in the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:55:28Z)
• Towards Detecting and Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Spoken Conversational Search [14.916529791823868]
  This paper draws upon insights from information seeking, psychology, cognitive science, and wearable sensors to provoke novel conversations in the community. We propose a framework including multimodal instruments and methods for experimental designs and settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T03:50:32Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Multimodal Search [0.6249768559720121]
  This paper introduces a novel multimodal search model that achieves a new performance milestone on the Fashion200K dataset. We also propose a novel search interface integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) to facilitate natural language interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T10:30:42Z)
• SSP: Self-Supervised Post-training for Conversational Search [63.28684982954115]
  We propose fullmodel (model) which is a new post-training paradigm with three self-supervised tasks to efficiently initialize the conversational search model. To verify the effectiveness of our proposed method, we apply the conversational encoder post-trained by model on the conversational search task using two benchmark datasets: CAsT-19 and CAsT-20.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-02T13:36:36Z)
• Investigating Conversational Search Behavior For Domain Exploration [0.5512295869673147]
  This study investigates open-ended search behavior for navigation through unknown information landscapes. We apply statistical analyses and process mining techniques to uncover general information-seeking patterns across five different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T17:43:03Z)
• Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overview [10.284830265068793]
  Explanations have gained an increasing level of interest in the AI and Machine Learning (ML) communities. This paper presents an overview of research where explanations are combined with interactive capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-29T07:46:11Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Probing Task-Oriented Dialogue Representation from Language Models [106.02947285212132]
  This paper investigates pre-trained language models to find out which model intrinsically carries the most informative representation for task-oriented dialogue tasks. We fine-tune a feed-forward layer as the classifier probe on top of a fixed pre-trained language model with annotated labels in a supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T21:34:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.