Incremental Gradient Descent with Small Epoch Counts is Surprisingly Slow on Ill-Conditioned Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04126v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 16:17:25 GMT
• Title: Incremental Gradient Descent with Small Epoch Counts is Surprisingly Slow on Ill-Conditioned Problems
• Authors: Yujun Kim, Jaeyoung Cha, Chulhee Yun,
• Abstract summary: We study the naive variant, Incremental Gradient Descent (IGD), on smooth convex functions.<n>Our analyses reveal that for the small epoch regime, IGD can exhibit surprisingly when lower functions are strongly convex.<n>It is still unknown whether permutation-based SGD can converge faster in this small epoch regime.
• Score: 10.65078014704416
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent theoretical results demonstrate that the convergence rates of permutation-based SGD (e.g., random reshuffling SGD) are faster than uniform-sampling SGD; however, these studies focus mainly on the large epoch regime, where the number of epochs $K$ exceeds the condition number $\kappa$. In contrast, little is known when $K$ is smaller than $\kappa$, and it is still a challenging open question whether permutation-based SGD can converge faster in this small epoch regime (Safran and Shamir, 2021). As a step toward understanding this gap, we study the naive deterministic variant, Incremental Gradient Descent (IGD), on smooth and strongly convex functions. Our lower bounds reveal that for the small epoch regime, IGD can exhibit surprisingly slow convergence even when all component functions are strongly convex. Furthermore, when some component functions are allowed to be nonconvex, we prove that the optimality gap of IGD can be significantly worse throughout the small epoch regime. Our analyses reveal that the convergence properties of permutation-based SGD in the small epoch regime may vary drastically depending on the assumptions on component functions. Lastly, we supplement the paper with tight upper and lower bounds for IGD in the large epoch regime.

Related papers

• Can SGD Handle Heavy-Tailed Noise? [6.111519084375339]
  Gradient Descent (SGD) is a machine learning project of large-scale optimization, yet its theoretical behavior under heavy-tailed noise is poorly understood.<n>We rigorously investigate whether SGD, can provably succeed under such adverse conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T20:09:41Z)
• Faster Convergence of Stochastic Accelerated Gradient Descent under Interpolation [51.248784084461334]
  We prove new convergence rates for a generalized version of Nesterov acceleration underrho conditions.<n>Our analysis reduces the dependence on the strong growth constant from $$ to $sqrt$ as compared to prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T00:41:19Z)
• High-probability Convergence Bounds for Nonlinear Stochastic Gradient Descent Under Heavy-tailed Noise [59.25598762373543]
  We show that wetailed high-prob convergence guarantees of learning on streaming data in the presence of heavy-tailed noise. We demonstrate analytically and that $ta$ can be used to the preferred choice of setting for a given problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T18:53:41Z)
• Demystifying the Myths and Legends of Nonconvex Convergence of SGD [17.445810977264067]
  gradient descent (SGD) and its variants are the main workhorses for solving large-scale optimization problems. As our analyses, we addressed certain myths and legends related to the non convergence of the gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:58:59Z)
• On Convergence of Incremental Gradient for Non-Convex Smooth Functions [63.51187646914962]
  In machine learning and network optimization, algorithms like shuffle SGD are popular due to minimizing the number of misses and good cache. This paper delves into the convergence properties SGD algorithms with arbitrary data ordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T17:47:27Z)
• Lower Generalization Bounds for GD and SGD in Smooth Stochastic Convex Optimization [9.019243171993553]
  Training steps $T$ and step-size $eta$ might affect certify in smooth convex optimization (SCO) problems. We first provide tight excess risk lower bounds for Gradient Descent (GD) and Gradient Descent (SGD) Recent works show better rates can be attained but the improvement is reduced when training time is long.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:24:33Z)
• SGDA with shuffling: faster convergence for nonconvex-P{\L} minimax optimization [18.668531108219415]
  We present a theoretical approach for solving minimax optimization problems using sequentially descent-ascent gradient (SGDA) We analyze both simultaneous and alternating SGDA-LL objectives for non-concave objectives with Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) geometry. Our rates also extend to mini-batch-GDARR, recovering few known rates for full gradient-batch descent-ascent gradient (GDA) Finally, we present a comprehensive lower bound for two-time-scale GDA, which matches the full rate for primal-PL-
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T08:05:41Z)
• Benign Underfitting of Stochastic Gradient Descent [72.38051710389732]
  We study to what extent may gradient descent (SGD) be understood as a "conventional" learning rule that achieves generalization performance by obtaining a good fit training data. We analyze the closely related with-replacement SGD, for which an analogous phenomenon does not occur and prove that its population risk does in fact converge at the optimal rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T13:25:01Z)
• Towards Noise-adaptive, Problem-adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent [7.176107039687231]
  We design step-size schemes that make gradient descent (SGD) adaptive to (i) the noise. We prove that $T$ iterations of SGD with Nesterov iterations can be near optimal. Compared to other step-size schemes, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a novel novel exponential step-size scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T19:22:14Z)
• Minibatch vs Local SGD with Shuffling: Tight Convergence Bounds and Beyond [63.59034509960994]
  We study shuffling-based variants: minibatch and local Random Reshuffling, which draw gradients without replacement. For smooth functions satisfying the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, we obtain convergence bounds which show that these shuffling-based variants converge faster than their with-replacement counterparts. We propose an algorithmic modification called synchronized shuffling that leads to convergence rates faster than our lower bounds in near-homogeneous settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T02:25:25Z)
• On the Almost Sure Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Non-Convex Problems [75.58134963501094]
  This paper analyzes the trajectories of gradient descent (SGD) We show that SGD avoids saddle points/manifolds with $1$ for strict step-size policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T14:11:26Z)
• On Tight Convergence Rates of Without-replacement SGD [52.99237600875452]
  For solving finite-sum optimization problems, SGD without replacement sampling is empirically shown to outperform SGD. In this work, we overcome these limitations by analyzing step sizes that vary across epochs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-18T16:14:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.