Edge interventions can mitigate demographic and prestige disparities in the Computer Science coauthorship network

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04435v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:36:24 GMT
• Title: Edge interventions can mitigate demographic and prestige disparities in the Computer Science coauthorship network
• Authors: Kate Barnes, Mia Ellis-Einhorn, Carolina Chávez-Ruelas, Nayera Hasan, Mohammad Fanous, Blair D. Sullivan, Sorelle Friedler, Aaron Clauset,
• Abstract summary: We investigate inequities in network centrality in a hand-collected data set of 5,670 U.S.-based faculty employed in Ph.D.-granting Computer Science departments.<n>We find that women and individuals with minoritized race identities are less central in the computer science coauthorship network.
• Score: 1.606071974243323
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social factors such as demographic traits and institutional prestige structure the creation and dissemination of ideas in academic publishing. One place these effects can be observed is in how central or peripheral a researcher is in the coauthorship network. Here we investigate inequities in network centrality in a hand-collected data set of 5,670 U.S.-based faculty employed in Ph.D.-granting Computer Science departments and their DBLP coauthorship connections. We introduce algorithms for combining name- and perception-based demographic labels by maximizing alignment with self-reported demographics from a survey of faculty from our census. We find that women and individuals with minoritized race identities are less central in the computer science coauthorship network, implying worse access to and ability to spread information. Centrality is also highly correlated with prestige, such that faculty in top-ranked departments are at the core and those in low-ranked departments are in the peripheries of the computer science coauthorship network. We show that these disparities can be mitigated using simulated edge interventions, interpreted as facilitated collaborations. Our intervention increases the centrality of target individuals, chosen independently of the network structure, by linking them with researchers from highly ranked institutions. When applied to scholars during their Ph.D., the intervention also improves the predicted rank of their placement institution in the academic job market. This work was guided by an ameliorative approach: uncovering social inequities in order to address them. By targeting scholars for intervention based on institutional prestige, we are able to improve their centrality in the coauthorship network that plays a key role in job placement and longer-term academic success.

Related papers

• Forecasting Faculty Placement from Patterns in Co-authorship Networks [3.0565132187715007]
  We consider faculty placement as an individual-level prediction task.<n>We use temporal co-authorship networks with conventional attributes such as doctoral department prestige and bibliometric features.<n>Our results underscore the role that social networks, professional endorsements, and implicit advocacy play in faculty hiring beyond traditional measures of scholarly productivity and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T17:09:23Z)
• Examining Different Research Communities: Authorship Network [0.0]
  We collected Google Scholar data for two different research domains in computer science: Data Mining and Software Engineering. The scholar database resources are powerful for network analysis, data mining, and identify links between authors via authorship network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T19:04:02Z)
• Networked Communication for Mean-Field Games with Function Approximation and Empirical Mean-Field Estimation [59.01527054553122]
  Decentralised agents can learn equilibria in Mean-Field Games from a non-episodic run of the empirical system.<n>We introduce function approximation to the existing setting, drawing on the Munchausen Online Mirror Descent method.<n>We show theoretically that exchanging policy information helps networked agents outperform both independent and even centralised agents in function-approximation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T13:32:46Z)
• Decentralized and Lifelong-Adaptive Multi-Agent Collaborative Learning [57.652899266553035]
  Decentralized and lifelong-adaptive multi-agent collaborative learning aims to enhance collaboration among multiple agents without a central server. We propose DeLAMA, a decentralized multi-agent lifelong collaborative learning algorithm with dynamic collaboration graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T09:21:11Z)
• The Compute Divide in Machine Learning: A Threat to Academic Contribution and Scrutiny? [1.0985060632689174]
  We show that a compute divide has coincided with a reduced representation of academic-only research teams in compute intensive research topics. To address the challenges arising from this trend, we recommend approaches aimed at thoughtfully expanding academic insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T01:26:11Z)
• Networked Communication for Decentralised Agents in Mean-Field Games [59.01527054553122]
  We introduce networked communication to the mean-field game framework.<n>We prove that our architecture has sample guarantees bounded between those of the centralised- and independent-learning cases.<n>We show that our networked approach has significant advantages over both alternatives in terms of robustness to update failures and to changes in population size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T10:45:39Z)
• Assessing Scientific Contributions in Data Sharing Spaces [64.16762375635842]
  This paper introduces the SCIENCE-index, a blockchain-based metric measuring a researcher's scientific contributions. To incentivize researchers to share their data, the SCIENCE-index is augmented to include a data-sharing parameter. Our model is evaluated by comparing the distribution of its output for geographically diverse researchers to that of the h-index.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T19:17:47Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Rank Diminishing in Deep Neural Networks [71.03777954670323]
  Rank of neural networks measures information flowing across layers. It is an instance of a key structural condition that applies across broad domains of machine learning. For neural networks, however, the intrinsic mechanism that yields low-rank structures remains vague and unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T12:03:32Z)
• The Dynamics of Faculty Hiring Networks [1.6114012813668934]
  We study a family of adaptive rewiring network models, which reinforce institutional prestige in five ways. We find that structural inequalities and centrality patterns in real hiring networks are best reproduced by a mechanism of global placement power. On the other hand, network measures of biased visibility are better recapitulated by a mechanism of local placement power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T21:02:20Z)
• GAEA: Graph Augmentation for Equitable Access via Reinforcement Learning [50.90625274621288]
  Disparate access to resources by different subpopulations is a prevalent issue in societal and sociotechnical networks. We introduce a new class of problems, Graph Augmentation for Equitable Access (GAEA), to enhance equity in networked systems by editing graph edges under budget constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T18:29:32Z)
• The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Research [0.2855485723554975]
  Large technology firms and elite universities have increased participation in major AI conferences since deep learning's unanticipated rise in 2012. The effect is concentrated among elite universities, which are ranked 1-50 in the QS World University Rankings. This increased presence of firms and elite universities in AI research has crowded out mid-tier (QS ranked 201-300) and lower-tier (QS ranked 301-500) universities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:11:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.