Explaining Matters: Leveraging Definitions and Semantic Expansion for Sexism Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06238v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 16:58:12 GMT
• Title: Explaining Matters: Leveraging Definitions and Semantic Expansion for Sexism Detection
• Authors: Sahrish Khan, Arshad Jhumka, Gabriele Pergola,
• Abstract summary: We propose two prompt-based data augmentation techniques for sexism detection.<n>We also introduce an ensemble strategy that resolves prediction ties by aggregating complementary perspectives from multiple language models.<n>Our experimental evaluation on the EDOS dataset demonstrates state-of-the-art performance across all tasks.
• Score: 9.477601265462694
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The detection of sexism in online content remains an open problem, as harmful language disproportionately affects women and marginalized groups. While automated systems for sexism detection have been developed, they still face two key challenges: data sparsity and the nuanced nature of sexist language. Even in large, well-curated datasets like the Explainable Detection of Online Sexism (EDOS), severe class imbalance hinders model generalization. Additionally, the overlapping and ambiguous boundaries of fine-grained categories introduce substantial annotator disagreement, reflecting the difficulty of interpreting nuanced expressions of sexism. To address these challenges, we propose two prompt-based data augmentation techniques: Definition-based Data Augmentation (DDA), which leverages category-specific definitions to generate semantically-aligned synthetic examples, and Contextual Semantic Expansion (CSE), which targets systematic model errors by enriching examples with task-specific semantic features. To further improve reliability in fine-grained classification, we introduce an ensemble strategy that resolves prediction ties by aggregating complementary perspectives from multiple language models. Our experimental evaluation on the EDOS dataset demonstrates state-of-the-art performance across all tasks, with notable improvements of macro F1 by 1.5 points for binary classification (Task A) and 4.1 points for fine-grained classification (Task C).

Related papers

• HiLa: Hierarchical Vision-Language Collaboration for Cancer Survival Prediction [55.00788339683146]
  We propose a novel Hierarchical vision-Language collaboration framework for improved survival prediction.<n> Specifically, HiLa employs pretrained feature extractors to generate hierarchical visual features from WSIs at both patch and region levels.<n>This ap-proach enables the comprehensive learning of discriminative visual features cor-responding to different survival-related attributes from prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T02:06:25Z)
• An Adaptive Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Implicit Sexism Detection in Digital Social Networks [0.728258471592763]
  We introduce an Adaptive Supervised Contrastive lEarning framework for implicit sexism detectioN (ASCEND)<n>A key innovation of our method is the incorporation of threshold-based contrastive learning.<n> Evaluations on the EXIST2021 and MLSC datasets demonstrate that ASCEND significantly outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:22:21Z)
• Estimating Commonsense Plausibility through Semantic Shifts [66.06254418551737]
  We propose ComPaSS, a novel discriminative framework that quantifies commonsense plausibility by measuring semantic shifts.<n> Evaluations on two types of fine-grained commonsense plausibility estimation tasks show that ComPaSS consistently outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:31:06Z)
• Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets [17.101242741559428]
  This paper focuses on intrinsic bias mitigation and measurement strategies for language models.<n>We delve deeper into intrinsic measurements, identifying inconsistencies and suggesting that these benchmarks may reflect different facets of gender stereotype.<n>Our findings underscore the complexity of gender stereotyping in language models and point to new directions for developing more refined techniques to detect and reduce bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T09:40:31Z)
• The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models [91.86718720024825]
  We center transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse identities to investigate how alignment procedures interact with pre-existing gender-diverse bias.<n>Our findings reveal that DPO-aligned models are particularly sensitive to supervised finetuning.<n>We conclude with recommendations tailored to DPO and broader alignment practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T06:50:50Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• AI-UPV at EXIST 2023 -- Sexism Characterization Using Large Language Models Under The Learning with Disagreements Regime [2.4261434441245897]
  This paper describes AI-UPV team's participation in the EXIST (sEXism Identification in Social neTworks) Lab at CLEF 2023. The proposed approach aims at addressing the task of sexism identification and characterization under the learning with disagreements paradigm. The proposed system uses large language models (i.e., mBERT and XLM-RoBERTa) and ensemble strategies for sexism identification and classification in English and Spanish.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T04:49:26Z)
• Under the Morphosyntactic Lens: A Multifaceted Evaluation of Gender Bias in Speech Translation [20.39599469927542]
  Gender bias is largely recognized as a problematic phenomenon affecting language technologies. Most of current evaluation practices adopt a word-level focus on a narrow set of occupational nouns under synthetic conditions. Such protocols overlook key features of grammatical gender languages, which are characterized by morphosyntactic chains of gender agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T11:14:16Z)
• Word Embeddings via Causal Inference: Gender Bias Reducing and Semantic Information Preserving [3.114945725130788]
  We propose a novel methodology that leverages a causal inference framework to effectively remove gender bias. Our comprehensive experiments show that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art results in gender-debiasing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T19:57:22Z)
• Deep Clustering by Semantic Contrastive Learning [67.28140787010447]
  We introduce a novel variant called Semantic Contrastive Learning (SCL) It explores the characteristics of both conventional contrastive learning and deep clustering. It can amplify the strengths of contrastive learning and deep clustering in a unified approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T20:20:48Z)
• "Call me sexist, but...": Revisiting Sexism Detection Using Psychological Scales and Adversarial Samples [2.029924828197095]
  We outline the different dimensions of sexism by grounding them in their implementation in psychological scales. From the scales, we derive a codebook for sexism in social media, which we use to annotate existing and novel datasets. Results indicate that current machine learning models pick up on a very narrow set of linguistic markers of sexism and do not generalize well to out-of-domain examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T13:07:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.