Fixing It in Post: A Comparative Study of LLM Post-Training Data Quality and Model Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06522v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:34:06 GMT
• Title: Fixing It in Post: A Comparative Study of LLM Post-Training Data Quality and Model Performance
• Authors: Aladin Djuhera, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe, Syed Zawad, Farhan Ahmed, Heiko Ludwig, Holger Boche,
• Abstract summary: We conduct the first comprehensive analysis of two prominent open post-training datasets: Tulu-3-SFT-Mix and SmolTalk.<n>We derive statistics that reveal structural and qualitative similarities and differences between the two datasets.<n>Our findings offer actionable insights for constructing more effective post-training datasets.
• Score: 38.362162910767466
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent work on large language models (LLMs) has increasingly focused on post-training and alignment with datasets curated to enhance instruction following, world knowledge, and specialized skills. However, most post-training datasets used in leading open- and closed-source LLMs remain inaccessible to the public, with limited information about their construction process. This lack of transparency has motivated the recent development of open-source post-training corpora. While training on these open alternatives can yield performance comparable to that of leading models, systematic comparisons remain challenging due to the significant computational cost of conducting them rigorously at scale, and are therefore largely absent. As a result, it remains unclear how specific samples, task types, or curation strategies influence downstream performance when assessing data quality. In this work, we conduct the first comprehensive side-by-side analysis of two prominent open post-training datasets: Tulu-3-SFT-Mix and SmolTalk. Using the Magpie framework, we annotate each sample with detailed quality metrics, including turn structure (single-turn vs. multi-turn), task category, input quality, and response quality, and we derive statistics that reveal structural and qualitative similarities and differences between the two datasets. Based on these insights, we design a principled curation recipe that produces a new data mixture, TuluTalk, which contains 14% fewer samples than either source dataset while matching or exceeding their performance on key benchmarks. Our findings offer actionable insights for constructing more effective post-training datasets that improve model performance within practical resource limits. To support future research, we publicly release both the annotated source datasets and our curated TuluTalk mixture.

Related papers

• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• Unsupervised Topic Models are Data Mixers for Pre-training Language Models [6.77198566340415]
  We propose a topic-based data mixing strategy for large language models (LLMs)<n>DataWeave employs a multi-stage clustering process to group semantically similar documents.<n>We confirm that the topics Science and Relationships are particularly effective, yielding the most substantial performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T03:25:56Z)
• Large Language Models and Synthetic Data for Monitoring Dataset Mentions in Research Papers [0.0]
  This paper presents a machine learning framework that automates dataset mention detection across research domains.<n>We employ zero-shot extraction from research papers, an LLM-as-a-Judge for quality assessment, and a reasoning agent for refinement to generate a weakly supervised synthetic dataset.<n>At inference, a ModernBERT-based classifier efficiently filters dataset mentions, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T16:16:02Z)
• Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
  We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets. The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method. The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z)
• A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selection [51.46695086779598]
  Real-world datasets often contain redundant and noisy data, imposing a negative impact on training efficiency and model performance.<n>Data selection has shown promise in identifying the most representative samples from the entire dataset.<n>We propose a novel CLIP-powered data selection framework that leverages multimodal information for more robust and generalizable sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:00:58Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIP [43.7219097444333]
  We introduce a testbed of six publicly available data sources to investigate how pre-training distributions induce robustness in CLIP. We find that the performance of the pre-training data varies substantially across distribution shifts. We find that combining multiple sources does not necessarily yield better models, but rather dilutes the robustness of the best individual data source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T18:24:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.